Literature DB >> 30261951

Evidence-based clinical practice guideline on nonrestorative treatments for carious lesions: A report from the American Dental Association.

Rebecca L Slayton, Olivia Urquhart, Marcelo W B Araujo, Margherita Fontana, Sandra Guzmán-Armstrong, Marcelle M Nascimento, Brian B Nový, Norman Tinanoff, Robert J Weyant, Mark S Wolff, Douglas A Young, Domenick T Zero, Malavika P Tampi, Lauren Pilcher, Laura Banfield, Alonso Carrasco-Labra.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: An expert panel convened by the American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs and the Center for Evidence-Based Dentistry conducted a systematic review and formulated evidence-based clinical recommendations for the arrest or reversal of noncavitated and cavitated dental caries using nonrestorative treatments in children and adults. TYPES OF STUDIES REVIEWED: The authors conducted a systematic search of the literature in MEDLINE and Embase via Ovid, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Cochrane database of systematic reviews to identify randomized controlled trials reporting on nonrestorative treatments for noncavitated and cavitated carious lesions. The authors used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach to assess the certainty in the evidence and move from the evidence to the decisions.
RESULTS: The expert panel formulated 11 clinical recommendations, each specific to lesion type, tooth surface, and dentition. Of the most effective interventions, the panel provided recommendations for the use of 38% silver diamine fluoride, sealants, 5% sodium fluoride varnish, 1.23% acidulated phosphate fluoride gel, and 5,000 parts per million fluoride (1.1% sodium fluoride) toothpaste or gel, among others. The panel also provided a recommendation against the use of 10% casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate. CONCLUSIONS AND PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Although the recommended interventions are often used for caries prevention, or in conjunction with restorative treatment options, these approaches have shown to be effective in arresting or reversing carious lesions. Clinicians are encouraged to prioritize use of these interventions based on effectiveness, safety, and feasibility.
Copyright © 2018 American Dental Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  American Dental Association; Carious lesion; caries; clinical recommendations; decision making; evidence-based dentistry; general practice; nonrestorative treatments; practice guidelines

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30261951     DOI: 10.1016/j.adaj.2018.07.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc        ISSN: 0002-8177            Impact factor:   3.634


  47 in total

1.  Pharmacokinetics of 38% topical silver diamine fluoride in healthy adult volunteers.

Authors:  Yvonne S Lin; Marilynn L Rothen; Peter Milgrom
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 3.634

2.  Improving Caries Risk Prediction Modeling: A Call for Action.

Authors:  M Fontana; A Carrasco-Labra; H Spallek; G Eckert; B Katz
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 6.116

Review 3.  The additional benefit of professional fluoride application for children as an adjunct to regular fluoride toothpaste: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lintong Yu; Xueqian Yu; Yueyang Li; Fengjiao Yang; Jialan Hong; Danchen Qin; Guangtai Song; Fang Hua
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  When to intervene in the caries process? An expert Delphi consensus statement.

Authors:  Falk Schwendicke; Christian Splieth; Lorenzo Breschi; Avijit Banerjee; Margherita Fontana; Sebastian Paris; Michael F Burrow; Felicity Crombie; Lyndie Foster Page; Patricia Gatón-Hernández; Rodrigo Giacaman; Neeraj Gugnani; Reinhard Hickel; Rainer A Jordan; Soraya Leal; Edward Lo; Hervé Tassery; William Murray Thomson; David J Manton
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 5.  The use of fluoride for the prevention of dental erosion and erosive tooth wear in children and adolescents.

Authors:  A Lussi; M A R Buzalaf; D Duangthip; V Anttonen; C Ganss; S H João-Souza; T Baumann; T S Carvalho
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2019-02-14

6.  Caries arrest effectiveness of silver diamine fluoride compared to alternative restorative technique: randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  H M Abdellatif; A M Ali; S I Baghdady; M A ElKateb
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2021-01-02

Review 7.  Guidelines on the use of fluoride for caries prevention in children: an updated EAPD policy document.

Authors:  K J Toumba; S Twetman; C Splieth; C Parnell; C van Loveren; N Α Lygidakis
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2019-11-08

8.  Remineralization effectiveness of adhesive containing amorphous calcium phosphate nanoparticles on artificial initial enamel caries in a biofilm-challenged environment.

Authors:  Menglin Fan; Jiaojiao Yang; Hockin H K Xu; Michael D Weir; Siying Tao; Zhaohan Yu; Yifang Liu; Meng Li; Xuedong Zhou; Kunneng Liang; Jiyao Li
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  Early Childhood Caries in Indigenous Communities.

Authors:  Steve Holve; Patricia Braun; James D Irvine; Kristen Nadeau; Robert J Schroth
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 7.124

10.  Evaluation of the ability of adhesives with antibacterial and remineralization functions to prevent secondary caries in vivo.

Authors:  Yifang Liu; Jiaojiao Yang; Yingming Yang; Meng Li; Hockin H K Xu; Michael D Weir; Xuedong Zhou; Kunneng Liang; Jiyao Li
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-01-23       Impact factor: 3.573

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.