| Literature DB >> 30261076 |
Giuseppe Potrick Stefani1,2, Bruna Marmett1,3, Jadson Pereira Alves1, Gabriella Berwig Möller1,2, Thiago Gomes Heck4, Matias Nunes Frizzo4, Marlise Di Domenico3, Gabriela Almeida Motta3, Pedro Dal Lago1,2, Ramiro Barcos Nunes1,2, Cláudia Ramos Rhoden3.
Abstract
L-arginine supplementation has been related to increased maximum strength and improvement of hemodynamic parameters in several diseases. The aim of our study was to evaluate the effect of L-arginine supplementation and resistance training on muscle mass, hemodynamic function and DNA damage in healthy rats subjected to a low-arginine concentration diet. Twenty three Wistar rats (290-320g) were divided into 4 groups: Sedentary (SED-Arg, n = 6), Sedentary+Arg (SED+Arg, n = 6), Resistance Training (RT-Arg, n = 5), Resistance Training+Arg (RT+Arg, n = 6). Trained animals performed resistance training protocol in a squat apparatus adapted for rats (4 sets of 10-12 repetitions, 90s of interval, 4x/week, 65-75% of One Maximum Repetition, for 8 weeks). Comet assay was performed to measure DNA damage in leukocytes. The resistance training induced higher muscle mass in trained groups. The L-arginine supplementation increased both gastrocnemius and left ventricle to body mass ratio and increased left ventricle contractility without changing hemodynamic variables. The SED+Arg group showed higher concentration of extracellular heat shock protein 72 (eHSP72) and total testosterone, as well as lower uric acid concentration in blood versus SED-Arg group. The administration of isolated L-arginine supplementation and its association with resistance training promoted less damage in leukocytes DNA. In conclusion, the L-arginine supplementation showed synergistic effect with resistance training regarding leukocyte genomic stability in a low-L-arginine diet scenario.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30261076 PMCID: PMC6160175 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204858
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Effects resistance training and L-arginine supplementation on maximum strength gain rats.
(A) Basal maximum strength measured by maximal repetition test (1MR) in the first (white bars) and in the last week (black bars) of the study. (B) Maximum strength gain (%) in eight weeks of resistance exercise training. Values in mean ± SD. Two-way ANOVA followed by the post-hoc de Student-Newman-Keuls. n = 5–6 animals/group; * P<0,05 vs. SED-Arg and SED+Arg groups.
Morphometric parameters of sedentary, trained and supplemented rats with L-arginine.
| G/BM (mg/g) | LV/BM (mg/g) | Initial Body Mass (g) | Final Body Mass (g) | Δ Body Mass (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SED-Arg | 4.60 ± 0.16 | 2.05 ± 0.03 | 312.67 ± 18.49 | 336.60 ± 21.88 | +7.40 ± 5.85 |
| SED+Arg | 5.13 ± 0.32 | 2.34 ± 0.20 | 315.20 ± 14.17 | 343.00 ± 2.35 | +9.01 ± 5.29 |
| RT-Arg | 5.07 ± 0.55 | 2.08 ± 0.31 | 309.40 ± 16.88 | 312.40 ± 11.41 | +1.08 ± 3.34 |
| RT+Arg | 5.32 ± 0.21 | 2.05 ± 0.04 | 313.17 ± 15.28 | 341.33 ± 4.93 | +10.09 ± 5.43 |
| < 0.05 | < 0.05 | > 0.05 | < 0.05 | < 0.05 |
Values in mean ± SD. Two-way ANOVA followed by the post-hoc of Student-Newman-Keuls. n = 5–6 animals/group. LV/BM, Left Ventricle-to-Body Mass Ratio; G/BM, Gastrocnemius-to-Body Mass Ratio.
*, P<0.05 compared to RT-Arg group
**; P<0.05 compared to SED-Arg group
Hemodynamic parameters of blood and ventricular pressure of sedentary, trained and supplemented rats with L-arginine.
| DBP (mmHg) | SBP (mmHg) | MBP (mmHg) | LVSP (mmHg) | HR (bpm) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SED-Arg | 79.42 ± 14.72 | 104.42 ± 18.07 | 91.68 ± 15.06 | 113.52 ± 21.52 | 216.01 ± 23.27 |
| SED+Arg | 85.72 ± 14.05 | 107.71 ± 17.81 | 97.85 ± 15.72 | 110.32 ± 15.80 | 215.16 ± 15.51 |
| RT-Arg | 75.03 ± 10.77 | 101.68 ± 17.38 | 93.25 ± 9.13 | 100.13 ± 19.19 | 205.83 ± 19.89 |
| RT+Arg | 82.07 ± 17.35 | 109.69 ± 23.43 | 90.70 ± 15.63 | 107.56 ± 21.35 | 217.18 ± 23.73 |
| > 0.05 | > 0.05 | > 0.05 | > 0.05 | > 0.05 |
Values in mean ± SD. Two-way ANOVA followed by the post-hoc of Student-Newman-Keuls. n = 5–6 animals/group. DBP, Diastolic Blood Pressure; SBP, Systolic Blood Pressure; MBP, Mean Blood Pressure; LVSP, Left Ventricle Systolic Pressure; HR, Heart Rate
Fig 2Effects resistance training and L-arginine supplementation on contractility and relaxation of left ventricle.
(A) Derivative of contraction (+dP/dtmax) in mmHg/s. (B) Derivative of relaxation (-dP/dtmax) in mmHg/s. Values in mean ± SD. Two-way ANOVA followed by the post-hoc of Student-Newman-Keuls. n = 5–6 animals/group; * P<0,05 vs. SED-Arg.
Biochemical parameters of rats submitted to resistance training and rats supplemented with L-arginine.
| eHSP72 (ng/mL) | Total Testosterone (ng/mL) | Urea (mg/dL) | Creatinine (mg/dL) | Total Cholesterol (mg/dL) | Triglycerides (mg/dL) | AST (UI/L) | ALT (UI/L) | Uric Acid (mg/dL) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SED-Arg | 0.53 ± 0.95 | 99.24 ± 74.48 | 33.20 ± 4.97 | 0.59 ± 0.04 | 46.60 ± 17.81 | 45.50 ± 20.73 | 187.33 ± 113.52 | 66.50 ± 20.33 | 1.60 ± 0.73 |
| SED+Arg | 5.05 ± 6.09 | 398.50 ± 193.37 | 35.80 ± 4.27 | 0.54 ± 0.04 | 49.00 ± 4.95 | 43.25 ± 17.86 | 161.00 ± 59.09 | 67.67 ± 15.98 | 0.75 ± 0.45 |
| RT-Arg | 1.24 ± 0.68 | 200.25 ± 34.64 | 33.80 ± 3.77 | 0.56 ± 0.03 | 41.40 ± 2.70 | 44.00 ± 4.83 | 222.20 ± 85.73 | 65.20 ± 4.27 | 1.20 ± 0.50 |
| RT+Arg | 3.34 ± 2.50 | 177.20 ± 97.19 | 34.40 ± 4.28 | 0.56 ± 0.05 | 50.80 ± 3.11 | 48.75 ± 5.38 | 128.67 ± 50.31 | 57.33 ± 12.79 | 0.80 ± 0.34 |
| < 0.05 | < 0.05 | > 0.05 | > 0.05 | > 0.05 | > 0.05 | > 0.05 | > 0.05 | < 0.05 |
Values in mean ± SD. Two-way ANOVA followed by the post-hoc of Student-Newman-Keuls. n = 5–6 animals/group. AST, Aspartate Aminotransferase; ALT, Alanine Aminotransferase.
*, P<0.05 compared to SED group.
Fig 3Effects resistance training and L-arginine supplementation on DNA damage of leucocytes.
(A) Images captured by optical microscopy of slides containing isolated lymphocytes from whole blood of sedentary and trained rats supplemented with L-arginine. (B) DNA percentage present in the comet’s tail. (C) Tail Moment, value of the product of the tail length and the percentage of DNA in the tail. (D) Olive Tail Moment, value obtained by the difference of center of gravity of the head with the comet’s tail. Values in mean ± SD. Two-way ANOVA followed by the post-hoc of Student-Newman-Keuls. n = 5–6 animals/group; * P<0.05 vs. SED-Arg; # P<0.05 vs. RT-Arg.