| Literature DB >> 29199900 |
Mary Beth Brown1,2, Attie Kempf1, Catherine M Collins1, Gary M Long1, Matthew Owens1, Shikha Gupta2, Yaron Hellman3, Vincent Wong3, Mark Farber2, Tim Lahm2,4.
Abstract
Current evidence suggests that exercise training is beneficial in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Unfortunately, the standard supervised, hospital-based programs limit patient accessibility to this important intervention. Our proof-of-concept study aimed to provide insight into the usefulness of a prescribed walking regimen along with arginine supplementation to improve outcomes for patients with PAH. Twelve PAH patients (all women) in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class (FC) II (n = 7) or III (n = 5) and in stable condition for ≥ 3 months were enrolled. Patients performed home- and fitness-center- based walking at 65-75% heart rate (HR) reserve for 45 min, six sessions/week for 12 weeks. Concomitant L-arginine supplementation (6000 mg/day) was provided to maximize beneficial endothelial training adaptations. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing, 6-min walk testing (6MWT), echocardiography, laboratory studies, and quality of life (QoL) survey (SF-36) were performed at baseline and 12 weeks. Eleven patients completed the study (72 session adherence rate = 96 ± 3%). Objective improvement was demonstrated by the 6MWT distance (increased by 40 ± 13 m, P = 0.01), VO2max (increased by 2 ± 0.7 mL/kg/min, P = 0.02), time-to-VO2max (increased by 2.5 ± 0.6 min, P = 0.001), VO2 at anaerobic threshold (increased by 1.3 ± 0.5 mL/kg/min, P = 0.04), HR recovery (reduced by 68 ± 23% in slope, P = 0.01), and SF-36 subscales of Physical Functioning and Energy/Fatigue (increased by 70 ± 34% and 74 ± 34%, respectively, P < 0.05). No adverse events occurred, and right ventricular function and brain natriuretic peptide levels remained stable, suggesting safety of the intervention. This proof-of-concept study indicates that a simple walking regimen with arginine supplementation is a safe and efficacious intervention for clinically stable PAH patients, with gains in objective function and QoL measures. Further investigation in a randomized controlled trial is warranted.Entities:
Keywords: PAH; aerobic exercise; cardiopulmonary rehabilitation; exercise training; home exercise program
Year: 2018 PMID: 29199900 PMCID: PMC5731727 DOI: 10.1177/2045893217743966
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pulm Circ ISSN: 2045-8932 Impact factor: 3.017
Fig. 1.Study protocol indicating pre- and post-intervention measures, separated by the 12-week walking program.
Fig. 2.Flowchart indicating the number of patients screened for enrollment, the number of patients and reasons for exclusion, and the number of patients completed.
Participant characteristics at enrollment.
| Age (years) | 44 ± 4.0 |
| Gender (n) | |
| Women | 12 |
| Men | 0 |
| Height (cm) | 160 ± 1.0 |
| Weight (kg) | 79 ± 6.8 |
| BMI | 30 ± 2.8 |
| 6MWD (m) | 482 ± 17 |
| PAH etiology (n) | |
| Idiopathic | 8 |
| Connective tissue disease | 1 |
| Congenital heart disease | 3 |
| NYHA class (n) | |
| II | 6 |
| III | 6 |
| Co-morbidities (n) | |
| Hypertension | 3 |
| Diabetes mellitus | 1 |
| Hyperlipidemia | 3 |
| Obstructive sleep apnea | 3 |
| Oxygen use (n) | 2 |
| PAH therapy (n) | |
| Prostacyclin | 4 |
| Ca + channel blocker | 2 |
| ERA | 2 |
| PDE5 inhibitor | 9 |
| Hemodynamics | |
| mPAP (mmHg) | 44 ± 5 |
| PAWP (mmHg) | 12 ± 2 |
| PVR (WU) | 6.6 ± 1.5 |
| Cardiac index (mL/min/m2) | 3.1 ± 0.3 |
Chart values obtained at time of enrollment for the 12 enrolled patients are presented as n, or as means ± SEM where indicated.
BMI, body mass index; 6MWD, 6-min walk distance; PAH, pulmonary arterial hypertension; NYHA, New York Heart Association; ERA, endothelin receptor antagonist; PDE, phosphodiesterase; mPAP, mean pulmonary arterial pressure; PAWP, pulmonary arterial wedge pressure; PVR, pulmonary vascular resistance.
Change in hemodynamics, weekly step count, 6MWT, and CPET.
| Variable | Initial | Final | Absolute change | Change (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weight (kg) | 79 ± 7 | 79 ± 7 | –0.2 ± 0.7 | 0.81 | 0.0 ± 0.9 |
| Resting HR (bpm) | 83 ± 3 | 79 ± 3 | –4.0 ± 3.7 | 0.32 | –3.7 ± 4.6 |
| Systolic BP (mmHg) | 113 ± 5 | 113 ± 5 | –0.1 ± 4.6 | 0.98 | 0.7 ± 3.9 |
| Diastolic BP (mmHg) | 81 ± 5 | 75 ± 3 | –6.8 ± 5.9 | 0.27 | –5.6 ± 5.3 |
| Pedometer 1-week average (steps/day) | 7717 ± 809 | 8276 ± 917 | 559 ± 522 | 0.31 | 3.8 ± 6.9 |
| 6MWT | |||||
| Distance (m) | 481 ± 18 | 521 ± 23 | 40 ± 13.4* |
| 8.6 ± 2.6 |
| Peak HR (bpm) | 112 ± 4 | 126 ± 8 | 14 ± 4.0* |
| 7.7 ± 4.8 |
| HRrecovery (slope 0–5 min) | –4 ± 0.5 | –7 ± 3 | –2.7 ± 0.8** |
| 65.0 ± 22 |
| HRrecovery (slope 0–10 min) | –2 ± 0.3 | –3 ± 0.4 | –1.2 ± 0.4* |
| 68.0 ± 19 |
| HRrecovery (%peak HR at 10 min) | 80 ± 2.4 | 68 ± 2.7 | –12 ± 2.5** |
| –14.2 ± 3 |
| CPET | |||||
| Time to VO2max (min) | 9.5 ± 0.6 | 12.0 ± 1.1 | 2.5 ± 0.6** |
| 24.4 ± 4.9 |
| VO2max (mL/kg/min) | 15.7 ± 1.2 | 17.5 ± 1.1 | 1.8 ± 0.7* |
| 13.2 ± 4.7 |
| VO2max (L/min) | 1.2 ± 0.1 | 1.3 ± 0.1 | 0.13 ± 0.1* |
| 12.7 ± 4.3 |
| VO2max %predicted | 51.4 ± 3.7 | 58.1 ± 3.8 | 6.6 ± 2.5* |
| 13.7 ± 5.0 |
| Ventilation max (L/min) | 45.8 ± 4.7 | 49.7 ± 5.6 | 6.0 ± 3.2 | 0.11 | 13.0 ± 6.0 |
| Peak METs | 5.3 ± 0.4 | 5.4 ± 0.3 | 0.2 ± 0.2 | 0.38 | 5.0 ± 3.6 |
| HR at rest (bpm) | 93 ± 6 | 89 ± 4 | –4.9 ± 4.8 | 0.33 | –3.3 ± 4.8 |
| HRmax (bpm) | 155 ± 6 | 152 ± 4 | –2.5 ± 3.0 | 0.49 | –1.1 ± 2.3 |
| Borg scale at max | 16.5 ± 0.5 | 15.2 ± 1.3 | –1.1 ± 1.1 | 0.36 | –7.2 ± 7.5 |
| VO2 at AT (mL/kg/min) | 13.4 ± 1.5 | 14.4 ± 1.2 | 1.3 ± 0.5* |
| 9.9 ± 4.3 |
| ΔSBP (mmHg) / ΔVO2 (mL/kg/min) | 3.7 ± 0.6 | 3.4 ± 0.6 | –0.2 ± 0.5 | 0.76 | 13.0 ± 6.0 |
| VE/VCO2 mid | 38.2 ± 0.4 | 36.4 ± 0.3 | –1.3 ± 1.2 | 0.31 | 5.0 ± 3.6 |
| 65–75% HRreserve | 133-9 ± 7 | 130-6 ± 7 | –3.2 ± 3 | 0.40 | –1.8 ± 2.6 |
Values are means ± SEM for the 11 of 12 patients that completed the study. Paired t-testing was used to analyze changes between the pre-test (Initial) and post-test (Final) at the end of 12 weeks in all outcome variables, with bold type and asterisks indicating a significant change (*P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01) in comparison to baseline.
HR, heart rate; bpm, beats per minute; BP, blood pressure; 6MWT, 6-min walk test; VO2max, maximum oxygen consumption; MET, metabolic equivalent; Peak HR, highest HR achieved; HRrecovery, HR relative to minutes of recovery; AT, anaerobic threshold; ΔSBP, change in systolic blood pressure from rest to peak exercise; ΔVO2, change in VO2 from rest to peak exercise; VE/VCO2, ventilatory equivalent for carbon dioxide; 65–75%HRreserve, calculated according to formula of Karvonen.[26]
Fig. 3.Training improvements in aerobic exercise tolerance and cardiorespiratory fitness. Individual responses are presented as different colored lines from initial to final values for 11 patients who completed the study. Paired t-testing was used to analyze changes between the pre-test (Initial) and post-test at the end of 12 weeks (Final) in all outcome variables. Mean ± SEM and P values for pre- to post-intervention change are presented in bar graphs adjacent to individual responses. (a) 6MWT distance for n = 11; (b) HRrecovery as slope of relationship between HR and 0–10 min of recovery following 6MWT for n = 10 (missed collection in one participant), including an additional bar graph indicating mean ± SEM for slope of relationship between HR and 0–5 min of recovery; (c) HRrecovery % of end-6MWT HR at the 10-min recovery time point for n = 10 (missed collection in one individual); (d) maximal rate of oxygen consumption relative to kg of body mass (VO2max) in CPET for n = 10 (unable to collect expired gases in one participant that required supplemental oxygen during exercise); (e) number of minutes completed of CPET incremental treadmill protocol for n = 11.
Fig. 4.Training improvements in QoL as assessed by the SF-36. Individual responses are presented as different colored lines from initial to final values for 11 patients who completed the study. Paired t-testing was used to analyze changes between the pre-test (Initial) and post-test at the end of 12 weeks (Final) in all outcome variables. Mean ± SEM and P values for pre- to post-intervention change is presented in bar graphs adjacent to individual responses. (a) SF-36 subscale for Physical Function; (b) SF-36 subscale for Energy/Fatigue; and (c) SF-36 Physical Component Summation (PCS) score.
Quality of life.
| SF-36 Scale | Initial | Final | Absolute change | Change (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Physical functioning | 58 ± 8 | 79 ± 7 | 21 ± 8* |
| 70 ± 34 |
| Energy/Fatigue | 48 ± 7 | 66 ± 4 | 17 ± 6* |
| 74 ± 34 |
| Role limitations due to physical health | 75 ± 12 | 91 ± 6 | 16 ± 11 | 0.19 | 53 ± 37 |
| Bodily pain | 81 ± 5 | 83 ± 5 | 2 ± 2 | 0.29 | 3 ± 2 |
| General health perception | 53 ± 4 | 55 ± 7 | 2 ± 5 | 0.68 | 4 ± 11 |
| Social functioning | 76 ± 7 | 78 ± 6 | 2 ± 8 | 0.79 | 14 ± 16 |
| Role limitations due to emotional | 97 ± 3 | 91 ± 6 | 0 ± 0 | 0.34 | 0 ± 0 |
| Emotional wellbeing | 72 ± 5 | 83 ± 3 | 11 ± 6 | 0.12 | 28 ± 19 |
Values are means ± SEM for the 11 of 12 patients that completed the study. Paired t-testing was used to analyze changes between the pre-test (Initial) and post-test (Final) at the end of 12 weeks in all SF-36 quality of life scales, with bold type and asterisks indicating a significant change (*P < 0.05) in comparison to baseline.
Change blood laboratory and echocardiography parameters (n = 11).
| Initial | Final | Absolute change | Change (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blood laboratory | |||||
| WBC | 7.71 ± 0.7 | 7.42 ± 0.6 | –0.3 ± 0.5 | 0.57 | –2.1 ± 5.2 |
| Hemoglobin (g/dL) | 13.60 ± 0.4 | 13.45 ± 0.4 | –0.2 ± 0.2 | 0.57 | 1 ± 1.9 |
| Platelets | 250.36 ± 25.6 | 266.18 ± 27.3 | 15.8 ± 11.5 | 0.20 | 6.8 ± 4.7 |
| Sodium (mmol/L) | 138.18 ± 0.7 | 137.45 ± 0.7 | –0.7 ± 0.6 | 0.27 | –0.5 ± 0.5 |
| Bicarbonate (mmol/L) | 23.20 ± 1.2 | 24.27 ± 0.9 | 0.9 ± 0.5 | 0.12 | 4.7 ± 2.5 |
| Creatinine (mg/dL) | 0.84 ± 0.1 | 0.82 ± 0.1 | –0.01 ± 0.01 | 0.34 | –1.3 ± 1.6 |
| BNP (pg/mL) | 109.82 ± 58.1 | 96.00 ± 44.2 | –13.8 ± 17.9 | 0.46 | 16.4 ± 25 |
| L-arginine (nmol/mL) | 48.82 ± 4.4 | 81.82 ± 10.7 | 33.0 ± 9.6* |
| 72.1 ± 18 |
| L-citrulline (nmol/mL) | 31.91 ± 3.7 | 37.36 ± 4.7 | 5.5 ± 3.8 | 0.19 | 19.9 ± 11.3 |
| Insulin sensitivity (TG/HDL) | 2.82 ± 0.4 | 2.52 ± 0.2 | –0.3 ± 0.2 | 0.29 | –1.7 ± 10.3 |
| C-reactive protein (mg/L) | 5.63 ± 1.9 | 5.32 ± 1.4 | –0.3 ± 0.9 | 0.74 | 43.7 ± 26.2 |
| Echocardiography | |||||
| RA area | 17.62 ± 2.1 | 18.92 ± 1.8 | 1.3 ± 1.3 | 0.35 | 11.2 ± 8.6 |
| Estimated RA pressure | 7.10 ± 0.8 | 6.60 ± 0.9 | –0.5 ± 0.9 | 0.59 | 4.2 ± 19.8 |
| TR jet gradient | 38.04 ± 4.6 | 41.06 ± 6.9 | 3.0 ± 3.6 | 0.43 | 5.7 ± 9.1 |
| TAPSE | 1.57 ± 0.2 | 1.56 ± 0.1 | –0.01 ± 0.1 | 0.93 | 4 ± 8.2 |
| RV EDD | 4.14 ± 0.3 | 4.19 ± 0.2 | 0.05 ± 0.1 | 0.76 | 2.6 ± 4 |
| RV ESD | 3.38 ± 0.3 | 3.40 ± 0.2 | 0.020 ± 0.1 | 0.90 | 2.5 ± 4.1 |
| RV FS | 0.19 ± 0.0 | 0.19 ± 0.0 | 0.001 ± 0.03 | 1.0 | 23.8 ± 27.4 |
| RV EDA | 27.35 ± 2.4 | 28.39 ± 2.5 | 1.04 ± 1.4 | 0.47 | 4.7 ± 5.2 |
| RV ESA | 19.20 ± 2.9 | 19.21 ± 2.9 | 0.007 ± 1.06 | 0.99 | 2.1 ± 5.7 |
| RV FA change | 0.32 ± 0.0 | 0.34 ± 0.0 | 0.02 ± 0.03 | 0.43 | 11.6 ± 10.8 |
| L atrial AP diameter | 3.16 ± 0.1 | 3.15 ± 0.1 | –0.01 ± 0.1 | 0.92 | 0.5 ± 3 |
| LV EDD | 4.31 ± 0.2 | 4.05 ± 0.3 | –0.3 ± 0.2 | 0.25 | –6.2 ± 5.5 |
| LV ESD | 2.82 ± 0.2 | 2.72 ± 0.2 | –0.1 ± 0.1 | 0.60 | –1.3 ± 7.3 |
| LV FS | 34.95 ± 3.1 | 31.86 ± 3.2 | –3.1 ± 3.7 | 0.43 | –4.3 ± 9.9 |
| LV EDV | 93.03 ± 8.6 | 92.39 ± 6.3 | –3.4 ± 9.1 | 0.72 | 0.7 ± 9.8 |
| LV ESV | 34.23 ± 4.9 | 42.01 ± 4.4 | 2.9 ± 5.0 | 0.58 | 18.5 ± 16.5 |
| LV EF | 64.22 ± 2.8 | 58.62 ± 1.8 | –4.8 ± 2.1 | 0.07 | –7.1 ± 3.3 |
| LV SV | 61.38 ± 4.8 | 52.75 ± 3.0 | –9.4 ± 5.1 | 0.11 | –11.6 ± 7.4 |
| AVA | 2.70 ± 0.1 | 2.84 ± 0.3 | 0.30 ± 0.4 | 0.68 | 10.2 ± 7.4 |
| E/A | 1.28 ± 0.1 | 1.15 ± 0.1 | –0.13 ± 0.09 | 0.20 | –7.2 ± 7 |
| E/E’ | 8.01 ± 0.7 | 7.80 ± 0.6 | –0.27 ± 1.6 | 0.84 | 3.8 ± 12.4 |
Values are means ± SEM for the 11 of 12 patients that completed the study. Paired t-testing was used to analyze changes between the pre-test (Initial) and post-test (Final) at the end of 12 weeks in all outcome variables, with bold type and asterisks indicating a significant change (*P < 0.05) in comparison to baseline.
WBC, white blood cell count; BNP, brain natriuretic peptide; TG, triclycerides; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; RA, right atrial; TR, tricuspid regurgitant; TAPSE, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion; RV, right ventricle; LV, left ventricle; EDD, end-diastolic diameter, ESD, end-systolic diameter; FS, fractional shortening; EDA, end-diastolic area; ESA, end-systolic area; FA change, fractional area change; AP, anteroposterior; EDV, end-diastolic volume; ESV, end-systolic volume; EF, ejection fraction; SV, stroke volume; AVA, aortic valve area; E/A, average ratio of transmitral Doppler E wave velocity to A wave velocity; E/E’, ratio of Doppler-derived peak E velocity and early diastolic E' velocity at mitral annulus.