Literature DB >> 30260943

Children with Heart Conditions and Their Special Health Care Needs - United States, 2016.

Meng-Yu Chen, Tiffany Riehle-Colarusso, Lorraine F Yeung, Camille Smith, Sherry L Farr.   

Abstract

Children with heart conditions often use more health care services and specialized care than children without a heart condition (1); however, little is known about the number of U.S. children with heart conditions and their special health care needs. CDC used data from the 2016 National Survey of Children's Health (NSCH) to estimate the prevalence of heart conditions among U.S. children aged 0-17 years, which indicated that 1.3% had a current heart condition and 1.1% had a past heart condition (representing approximately 900,000 and 755,000 children, respectively). Sixty percent and 40% of children with current and past heart conditions, respectively, had one or more special health care needs, compared with 18.7% of children without a heart condition (adjusted prevalence ratios [aPRs] = 3.1 and 2.1, respectively). Functional limitations were 6.3 times more common in children with current heart conditions (30.7%) than in those without heart conditions (4.6%). Among children with current heart conditions, males, children with lower family income, and children living in other than a two-parent household had an increased prevalence of special health care needs. These findings highlight the importance of developmental surveillance and screening for children with heart conditions and might inform public health resource planning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30260943      PMCID: PMC6188128          DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6738a1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep        ISSN: 0149-2195            Impact factor:   17.586


Children with heart conditions often use more health care services and specialized care than children without a heart condition (); however, little is known about the number of U.S. children with heart conditions and their special health care needs. CDC used data from the 2016 National Survey of Children’s Health (NSCH) to estimate the prevalence of heart conditions among U.S. children aged 0–17 years, which indicated that 1.3% had a current heart condition and 1.1% had a past heart condition (representing approximately 900,000 and 755,000 children, respectively). Sixty percent and 40% of children with current and past heart conditions, respectively, had one or more special health care needs, compared with 18.7% of children without a heart condition (adjusted prevalence ratios [aPRs] = 3.1 and 2.1, respectively). Functional limitations were 6.3 times more common in children with current heart conditions (30.7%) than in those without heart conditions (4.6%). Among children with current heart conditions, males, children with lower family income, and children living in other than a two-parent household had an increased prevalence of special health care needs. These findings highlight the importance of developmental surveillance and screening for children with heart conditions and might inform public health resource planning. Heart conditions in children can be congenital or acquired and range from asymptomatic to life-threatening. Congenital heart defects (CHDs) are the most common type of birth defect in the United States, affecting approximately 1% of live births (). Children with CHDs often use more health care or educational services than do children without CHDs and might require specialized care (,,). Less is known about the prevalence or needs of children with acquired heart conditions. Previously, there have been no known U.S. population-based estimates of the number of children with heart conditions or their special health care needs. NSCH is a population-based, nationally representative survey of parents or primary caregivers (parents) of noninstitutionalized U.S. children aged 0–17 years.* NSCH asks parents about a selected child’s health, health care access, and family characteristics. In 2016, a total of 364,150 households were sampled; 138,009 (37.9%) parents completed screener surveys, and 50,212 (36.4%) of those completed topical surveys. The overall weighted response rate was 40.7%. Parents were asked if they had ever been told by a health care provider that their child had a heart condition. Those who responded affirmatively were asked if their child currently had a heart condition. Children’s heart condition status was categorized as “current,” “past,” or “none.” Parents were also asked about their child’s special health care needs using a standardized five-item screener that included 1) need for or use of medications (other than vitamins) prescribed by a doctor; 2) need for or use of medical care, mental health, or educational services beyond those of a similarly aged child (referred to as “average use”); 3) limitation in the child’s ability to do things most children of the same age can do; 4) need for or use of specialized therapies such as physical, occupational, or speech therapy; and 5) need for or receipt of treatment or counseling for an emotional, behavioral, or developmental problem. If any special health care need was attributable to a medical, behavioral, or other health condition that had lasted, or was expected to last, 12 months or longer, the child was considered to have a special health care need. The questionnaire also inquired about 26 other health conditions. The numbers and percentages of children with current, past, and no heart conditions were calculated. Chi-square tests were used to examine the differences in demographic characteristics (sex, age, race/ethnicity, family income as a percentage of the federal poverty level [FPL], highest parental education level achieved, health insurance type, and household structure); other health conditions; and special health care needs, by heart condition status. Marginal prediction approach to logistic regression was used to assess the association between heart condition status and one or more special health care needs, adjusted for demographic characteristics. Among children with a current heart condition, characteristics associated with having one or more special health care needs also were examined. All analyses were repeated excluding children with Down syndrome or other genetic conditions because these children’s heart conditions might be related to the syndromes. All analyses included design parameters to account for complex sampling and weights to generate population-based estimates of the numbers and prevalences of children with and without heart conditions. Among the 50,212 children in the sample, 1,733 (3.5%) were excluded from analysis because of missing information, including heart condition status (180), special health care needs (309), and demographic characteristics (1,244). Excluded children were more commonly nonwhite, not privately insured, and living in households with lower income, lower parental education level, and other than two parents than were children who were not excluded (p<0.05 for all). After weighting the data to represent the U.S. population of children 0–17 years, an estimated 900,000 U.S. children (1.3% of U.S. children; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.1–1.5) had a current heart condition, 755,000 children (1.1%; 95% CI = 0.9–1.3) had a past heart condition, and 68.1 million children (97.6%; 95% CI = 97.3–97.9) had no heart condition. Among children with current heart conditions, 58.3% were male, 55.7% were non-Hispanic white, 21.5% had family income <100% of FPL, 64.8% had at least one parent with higher than a high school education, 72.3% lived in a two-parent household, and 55.4% had private health insurance (Table 1). Demographic characteristics did not differ by heart condition status. Among children with current and past heart conditions, 67.2% and 60.5%, respectively, had one or more other health conditions, compared with 46.7% of children with no heart condition (p<0.001).
TABLE 1

Characteristics of children aged 0–17 years, by parent-reported heart condition status — National Survey of Children’s Health, United States, 2016

CharacteristicHeart condition status
Chi- square p value
Current
Past
None
Unweighted no.Weighted % (95% CI)Unweighted no.Weighted % (95% CI)Unweighted no.Weighted % (95% CI)
Total
634

498

47,347


Sex
Male
356
58.3 (50.0–66.1)
267
53.5 (42.6–64.1)
24,189
50.8 (49.8–51.8)
0.17
Female
278
41.7 (33.9–50.0)
231
46.5 (35.9–57.4)
23,158
49.2 (48.2–50.2)
Age group (yrs)
0–5
185
28.9 (22.9–35.7)
136
27.9 (20.5–36.7)
13,717
32.4 (31.5–33.4)
0.16
6–11
194
44.0 (35.9–52.4)
144
32.7 (23.2–43.7)
14,139
33.9 (32.9–34.9)
12–17
255
27.1 (21.6–33.5)
218
39.5 (29.1–50.9)
19,491
33.7 (32.8–34.6)
Race/Ethnicity
White, non-Hispanic
455
55.7 (47.3–63.8)
356
52.0 (41.0–62.8)
33,510
52.5 (51.5–53.6)
0.75
Other*
179
44.3 (36.2–52.7)
142
48.0 (37.2–59.0)
13,837
47.5 (46.4–48.5)
Family income as a percentage of federal poverty level
<100%
72
21.5 (15.5–28.9)
58
28.7 (17.6–43.3)
4,309
20.5 (19.5–21.5)
0.28
100%–199%
112
27.4 (19.6–36.8)
81
19.4 (13.2–27.6)
7,375
21.9 (21.0–22.9)
200%–399%
208
27.4 (21.8–33.9)
169
27.6 (20.6–36.0)
14,693
27.2 (26.3–28.0)
≥400%
242
23.7 (18.7–29.7)
190
24.2 (17.6–32.3)
20,970
30.4 (29.6–31.2)
Parental education level §
High school graduate or less
107
35.2 (26.9–44.6)
77
29.3 (19.9–40.9)
6,772
28.4 (27.3–29.6)
0.38
More than high school
527
64.8 (55.4–73.1)
421
70.7 (59.1–80.1)
40,575
71.6 (70.4–72.7)
Household structure
Two parents
503
72.3 (65.1–78.5)
393
77.6 (69.6–83.9)
38,606
75.8 (74.9–76.7)
0.54
Other
131
27.7 (21.5–34.9)
105
22.4 (16.1–30.4)
8,741
24.2 (23.3–25.1)
Insurance type
Any private
459
55.4 (47.0–63.5)
354
50.7 (39.9–61.5)
36,679
61.6 (60.5–62.6)
0.10
Public, unspecified, or uninsured17344.6 (36.5–53.0)14149.3 (38.5–60.1)10,54438.4 (37.4–39.5)

Abbreviation: CI = confidence interval.

* Includes Hispanic, non-Hispanic black, American Indian/Alaska Native, Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, and Asian.

† Based on the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Poverty Guidelines.

§ Highest education level among two parents or child's primary caregivers.

¶ 129 had missing information on insurance type.

Abbreviation: CI = confidence interval. * Includes Hispanic, non-Hispanic black, American Indian/Alaska Native, Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, and Asian. † Based on the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Poverty Guidelines. § Highest education level among two parents or child's primary caregivers. ¶ 129 had missing information on insurance type. Sixty percent of children with current heart conditions and 40.0% with past heart conditions had one or more special health care needs, compared with 18.7% of children without a heart condition (Table 2). Children with heart conditions most commonly needed or used prescription medicines (current = 42.8%; past = 26.6%) and had above average use of medical care, mental health, or educational services (current = 41.8%; past = 23.9%). Children with current or past heart conditions were 3.1 and 2.1 times more likely, respectively, to have one or more special health care needs than were children without a heart condition, with the largest relative differences observed for functional limitations (current aPR = 6.3; 95% CI = 5.0–8.1) (past aPR = 3.7; 95% CI = 2.4–5.6).
TABLE 2

Percentage and adjusted prevalence ratio* of special health care needs among children aged 0–17 years, by parent-reported heart condition status — National Survey of Children’s Health, United States, 2016

Special health care needsHeart condition status
Current
Past
None
% (95% CI)aPR* (95% CI)% (95% CI)aPR* (95% CI)% (95% CI)
Has one or more special health care needs
60.0 (51.6–67.8)
3.1 (2.7–3.6)
40.0 (29.9–50.9)
2.1 (1.6–2.7)
18.7 (18.0–19.5)
Needs or uses prescription medicines
42.8 (35.3–50.7)
3.0 (2.5–3.6)
26.6 (17.5–38.1)
1.9 (1.3–2.8)
13.8 (13.2–14.5)
Above average use of health care or educational services§
41.8 (34.5–49.4)
4.2 (3.5–5.1)
23.9 (17.2–32.2)
2.4 (1.8–3.3)
9.5 (9.0–10.1)
Has functional limitations
30.7 (24.3–38.0)
6.3 (5.0–8.1)
17.4 (11.5–25.5)
3.7 (2.4–5.6)
4.6 (4.1–5.0)
Needs or uses physical, occupational, or speech therapies
22.4 (16.9–29.0)
4.3 (3.2–5.7)
14.4 (9.2–21.8)
2.9 (1.8–4.6)
4.7 (4.3–5.2)
Needs or receives treatment or counseling for emotional, developmental or behavioral conditions23.4 (17.8–30.0)2.7 (2.1–3.5)22.5 (15.9–30.9)2.7 (1.9–3.8)8.0 (7.5–8.5)

Abbreviations: aPR = adjusted prevalence ratio; CI = confidence interval.

* Prevalence ratio of special health care needs for current and past heart conditions versus no heart condition, adjusted for sex, age group, race/ethnicity, family income as a percentage of the federal poverty level, parental education level, and household structure.

Based on having one or more of the following five conditions: needing or using prescription medicine; needing or using more medical care, mental health, or educational services than other children their age; having limitations in doing things, compared with other children their age; needing special therapy (e.g., physical, occupational, or speech therapy); or having an emotional, developmental, or behavioral problem in need of counseling or treatment. These conditions must be related to a medical, behavioral, or other health condition that has lasted or is expected to last 12 months or longer.

§ Beyond those of a similarly aged child.

Abbreviations: aPR = adjusted prevalence ratio; CI = confidence interval. * Prevalence ratio of special health care needs for current and past heart conditions versus no heart condition, adjusted for sex, age group, race/ethnicity, family income as a percentage of the federal poverty level, parental education level, and household structure. Based on having one or more of the following five conditions: needing or using prescription medicine; needing or using more medical care, mental health, or educational services than other children their age; having limitations in doing things, compared with other children their age; needing special therapy (e.g., physical, occupational, or speech therapy); or having an emotional, developmental, or behavioral problem in need of counseling or treatment. These conditions must be related to a medical, behavioral, or other health condition that has lasted or is expected to last 12 months or longer. § Beyond those of a similarly aged child. Among children with current heart conditions, an increased prevalence of special health care needs was observed among males (aPR = 1.3; 95% CI = 1.1–1.7), children with family income <100% of FPL (aPR = 1.4; 95% CI = 1.0–2.0), and children living in other than a two-parent household (aPR = 1.3; 95% CI = 1.0–1.6) (Table 3). Findings did not change substantially after excluding 1,650 children with Down syndrome or other genetic conditions, 181 (11%) of whom had a heart condition.
TABLE 3

Associations between selected demographic characteristics and special health care needs among children aged 0–17 years who have a current heart condition — National Survey of Children’s Health, United States, 2016

CharacteristicOne or more special health care needs
aPR* (95% CI)
Weighted % (95% CI)
Sex
Male
68.9 (60.5–76.3)
1.3 (1.1–1.7)
Female
47.4 (34.5–60.7)
Referent
Age group (yrs)
0–5
57.8 (45.9–68.9)
Referent
6–11
58.5 (42.7–72.7)
1.0 (0.7–1.2)
12–17
64.4 (53.4–74.4)
1.1 (0.9–1.3)
Race/Ethnicity


White, non-Hispanic
62.4 (54.6–69.7)
Referent
Other
56.8 (41.3–71.1)
0.9 (0.7–1.1)
Family income as a percentage of federal poverty level §
<100%
80.5 (67.3–89.3)
1.4 (1.0–2.0)
100%–199%
52.8 (32.6–72.2)
1.0 (0.7–1.5)
200%–399%
59.5 (47.8–70.2)
1.1 (0.9–1.5)
≥400%
50.1 (38.5–61.7)
Referent
Parental education level
High school graduate or less
62.0 (41.6–78.9)
1.0 (0.8–1.3)
More than high school
58.8 (51.6–65.7)
Referent
Household structure
Two parents
54.2 (44.2–63.8)
Referent
Other75.1 (63.3–84.0)1.3 (1.0–1.6)

Abbreviations: aPR = adjusted prevalence ratio. CI = confidence interval.

* Prevalence ratios adjusted for sex, age group, race/ethnicity, family income, parental education level, and household structure.

† Includes Hispanic, non-Hispanic black, American Indian/Alaska Native, Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, and Asian.

§ Based on the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Poverty Guidelines.

¶ Highest education level among two parents or child's primary caregivers.

Abbreviations: aPR = adjusted prevalence ratio. CI = confidence interval. * Prevalence ratios adjusted for sex, age group, race/ethnicity, family income, parental education level, and household structure. † Includes Hispanic, non-Hispanic black, American Indian/Alaska Native, Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, and Asian. § Based on the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Poverty Guidelines. ¶ Highest education level among two parents or child's primary caregivers.

Discussion

According to the 2016 NSCH, 1.3% and 1.1% of U.S. children had a current or past heart condition, respectively. Because the specific types of heart conditions were unknown (i.e., congenital versus acquired), comparing current findings with published estimates of CHDs or acquired heart conditions is difficult. The birth prevalence of CHDs is nearly 1%, and approximately 1 million U.S. children have CHDs (). Although U.S. estimates of some acquired heart diseases such as those resulting from Kawasaki disease () and rheumatic heart disease () exist, the prevalence of other acquired heart conditions in children is unknown. Children with CHDs are at increased risk for developmental disabilities and speech, motor, behavior, or learning problems (), whereas the risk for children with acquired heart conditions has not been quantified. The higher prevalence of special health care needs among children with heart conditions, particularly functional limitations identified in this study, supports the American Academy of Pediatrics’ guidance on developmental surveillance and screening for early identification and intervention (), particularly for children with complex CHDs (e.g. single ventricle defects) (). Similar to the present findings among children with CHDs, male sex, lower family income, and other than two-parent household structure have been associated with special health care needs in the general pediatric population (). The differences in the prevalence of special health care needs by sex, family income, and household structure could reflect a difference in health status or differential ascertainment. Associations between special health care needs and family income and household structure might be attributable to stress and financial issues associated with the child’s health and treatment (). More information is needed to know what resources might support families and benefit children. The findings in this report are subject to at least five limitations. First, data are parent-reported and unconfirmed by medical records; however, according to findings from a study that used medical records to verify parental report of a diagnosis of autism (), parental report of their child’s medical history might be valid. Second, separate analyses for congenital, acquired, or other heart conditions could not be conducted because information on the type of heart condition was not available. Third, the composition of heart conditions relies on what the responding parent considered a “heart condition” or a “current heart condition,” which might underestimate or overestimate the prevalence of heart conditions. Fourth, although the data were weighted for nonresponse, bias might remain. Finally, the temporality of special health care needs and family income or household structure is unknown. These first population-based prevalence estimates of children with heart conditions and their special health care needs highlight the importance of guidelines for developmental surveillance and screening for early identification and intervention (,). These estimates could inform national and state child health programs to ensure that children with heart conditions receive necessary services.

What is already known about this topic?

Children with heart conditions often need specialized care. Little is known about the number of U.S. children living with heart conditions and their special health care needs.

What is added by this report?

In 2016, 1.3% of U.S. children had a current heart condition, and 1.1% had a past heart condition. Children with past and current heart conditions had higher prevalences of one or more special health care needs, compared with children without heart conditions.

What are the implications for public health practice?

These findings highlight the importance of developmental surveillance and screening among children with heart conditions for early identification and intervention and could inform public health resource planning.
  10 in total

1.  Financial burdens and mental health needs in families of children with congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Nancy McClung; Jill Glidewell; Sherry L Farr
Journal:  Congenit Heart Dis       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 2.007

2.  Identifying infants and young children with developmental disorders in the medical home: an algorithm for developmental surveillance and screening.

Authors: 
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 3.  The global burden of group A streptococcal diseases.

Authors:  Jonathan R Carapetis; Andrew C Steer; E Kim Mulholland; Martin Weber
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 25.071

4.  Verification of parent-report of child autism spectrum disorder diagnosis to a web-based autism registry.

Authors:  Amy M Daniels; Rebecca E Rosenberg; Connie Anderson; J Kiely Law; Alison R Marvin; Paul A Law
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2012-02

Review 5.  Diagnosis, Treatment, and Long-Term Management of Kawasaki Disease: A Scientific Statement for Health Professionals From the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Brian W McCrindle; Anne H Rowley; Jane W Newburger; Jane C Burns; Anne F Bolger; Michael Gewitz; Annette L Baker; Mary Anne Jackson; Masato Takahashi; Pinak B Shah; Tohru Kobayashi; Mei-Hwan Wu; Tsutomu T Saji; Elfriede Pahl
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Congenital Heart Defects and Receipt of Special Education Services.

Authors:  Tiffany Riehle-Colarusso; Andrew Autry; Hilda Razzaghi; Coleen A Boyle; William T Mahle; Kim Van Naarden Braun; Adolfo Correa
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 7.124

7.  An epidemiologic profile of children with special health care needs.

Authors:  P W Newacheck; B Strickland; J P Shonkoff; J M Perrin; M McPherson; M McManus; C Lauver; H Fox; P Arango
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 7.124

8.  Long-term outcomes in children with congenital heart disease: National Health Interview Survey.

Authors:  Hilda Razzaghi; Matthew Oster; Jennita Reefhuis
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 4.406

9.  Congenital Heart Defects in the United States: Estimating the Magnitude of the Affected Population in 2010.

Authors:  Suzanne M Gilboa; Owen J Devine; James E Kucik; Matthew E Oster; Tiffany Riehle-Colarusso; Wendy N Nembhard; Ping Xu; Adolfo Correa; Kathy Jenkins; Ariane J Marelli
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Neurodevelopmental outcomes in children with congenital heart disease: evaluation and management: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Bradley S Marino; Paul H Lipkin; Jane W Newburger; Georgina Peacock; Marsha Gerdes; J William Gaynor; Kathleen A Mussatto; Karen Uzark; Caren S Goldberg; Walter H Johnson; Jennifer Li; Sabrina E Smith; David C Bellinger; William T Mahle
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 29.690

  10 in total
  3 in total

1.  Screening and Evaluation of Neurodevelopmental Impairments in Infants Under 6 Months of Age with Congenital Heart Disease.

Authors:  Tanya Tripathi; Tondi M Harrison; Janet M Simsic; Thais Invencao Cabral; Jill C Heathcock
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 1.655

2.  Preventive Dental Care and Oral Health of Children and Adolescents With and Without Heart Conditions - United States, 2016-2019.

Authors:  Karrie F Downing; Lorena Espinoza; Matthew E Oster; Sherry L Farr
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 17.586

Review 3.  Rehabilitation in Pediatric Heart Failure and Heart Transplant.

Authors:  Ana Ubeda Tikkanen; Emily Berry; Erin LeCount; Katherine Engstler; Meredith Sager; Paul Esteso
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 3.418

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.