Yao Huang1, Yan Lin1, Wei Hu1, Changchun Ma2, Weixun Lin3, Zhening Wang1, Jiahao Liang1, Wei Ye1, Jiayun Zhao1, Renhua Wu1. 1. Radiology Department, Second Affiliated Hospital, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, P.R. China. 2. Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Tumor Hospital, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, P.R. China. 3. Surgery Department, Second Affiliated Hospital, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, P.R. China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Diffusion-kurtosis imaging (DKI) has preliminarily shown promise as a relatively new MRI technique to provide useful information regarding breast lesions, but the diagnostic performance of DKI has not been fully evaluated. PURPOSE: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of DKI, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI) and proton MR spectroscopy (1 H-MRS) in differentiating malignant from benign breast lesions independently or jointly, and explore the correlation between DKI-derived parameters and prognostic factors. STUDY TYPE: Prospective. SUBJECTS: Seventy-one patients with breast lesions (50 malignant, 26 benign). SEQUENCE: DKI, DWI, DCE-MRI, and 1 H-MRS were performed at 3.0T. ASSESSMENT: Mean kurtosis (MK), mean diffusivity (MD), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), BI-RADS category, and choline peaks were analyzed by two experienced radiologists. STATISTICAL TESTS: Student's t-test was used for continuous variables; receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis for assessing the diagnostic accuracy of imaging parameters; Spearman or Pearson correlations for assessing the associations between imaging parameters and prognostic factors. RESULTS: MK exhibited higher area under the curves (AUCs) for differentiating malignant from benign lesions than did MD, ADC, DCE, and tCho (0.979 vs. 0.928, 0.911, 0.777, and 0.833, respectively, P < 0.05). MK showed a positive association with Ki-67 expression (r = 0.508) and histologic grades (r = 0.551), whereas MD and ADC were negatively correlated with Ki-67 expression (r = -0.416 and r = -0.458) and histologic grades (r = -0.411 and r = -0.319). Moreover, MK showed relatively higher AUCs compared with MD and ADC in detecting breast cancers with lymph nodal involvement, histologic grades, and Ki-67 expression. DATA CONCLUSION: MK has higher diagnostic accuracy compared with ADC, DCE, and tCho regarding detection of breast cancer. Moreover, DKI shows promise as a quantitative imaging technique for characterizing breast lesions, highlighting the potential utility of MK as a promising imaging marker for predicting tumor aggressiveness. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;49:845-856.
BACKGROUND:Diffusion-kurtosis imaging (DKI) has preliminarily shown promise as a relatively new MRI technique to provide useful information regarding breast lesions, but the diagnostic performance of DKI has not been fully evaluated. PURPOSE: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of DKI, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI) and proton MR spectroscopy (1 H-MRS) in differentiating malignant from benign breast lesions independently or jointly, and explore the correlation between DKI-derived parameters and prognostic factors. STUDY TYPE: Prospective. SUBJECTS: Seventy-one patients with breast lesions (50 malignant, 26 benign). SEQUENCE: DKI, DWI, DCE-MRI, and 1 H-MRS were performed at 3.0T. ASSESSMENT: Mean kurtosis (MK), mean diffusivity (MD), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), BI-RADS category, and choline peaks were analyzed by two experienced radiologists. STATISTICAL TESTS: Student's t-test was used for continuous variables; receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis for assessing the diagnostic accuracy of imaging parameters; Spearman or Pearson correlations for assessing the associations between imaging parameters and prognostic factors. RESULTS: MK exhibited higher area under the curves (AUCs) for differentiating malignant from benign lesions than did MD, ADC, DCE, and tCho (0.979 vs. 0.928, 0.911, 0.777, and 0.833, respectively, P < 0.05). MK showed a positive association with Ki-67 expression (r = 0.508) and histologic grades (r = 0.551), whereas MD and ADC were negatively correlated with Ki-67 expression (r = -0.416 and r = -0.458) and histologic grades (r = -0.411 and r = -0.319). Moreover, MK showed relatively higher AUCs compared with MD and ADC in detecting breast cancers with lymph nodal involvement, histologic grades, and Ki-67 expression. DATA CONCLUSION: MK has higher diagnostic accuracy compared with ADC, DCE, and tCho regarding detection of breast cancer. Moreover, DKI shows promise as a quantitative imaging technique for characterizing breast lesions, highlighting the potential utility of MK as a promising imaging marker for predicting tumor aggressiveness. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;49:845-856.
Authors: Anna Mlynarska-Bujny; Sebastian Bickelhaupt; Frederik Bernd Laun; Franziska König; Wolfgang Lederer; Heidi Daniel; Mark Edward Ladd; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer; Stefan Delorme; Tristan Anselm Kuder Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2020-08-06 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Isaac Daimiel Naranjo; Alexis Reymbaut; Patrik Brynolfsson; Roberto Lo Gullo; Karin Bryskhe; Daniel Topgaard; Dilip D Giri; Jeffrey S Reiner; Sunitha B Thakur; Katja Pinker-Domenig Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2021-03-31 Impact factor: 6.639