Yukako Kawasaki1,2, Taketoshi Yoshida1, Mie Matsui3, Akiko Hiraiwa4, Satomi Inomata1, Kentaro Tamura1, Masami Makimoto1, Kenichi Oishi2. 1. Division of Neonatology, Maternal and Perinatal Center, Toyama University Hospital, Toyama, Japan. 2. The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD. 3. Laboratory of Clinical Cognitive Neuroscience, Institute of Liberal Arts and Science, Kanazawa University, Kakuma-machi, Kanazawa, Ishikawa, Japan. 4. Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Measuring head circumference (HC) in infants is an easy screening procedure with which to detect abnormalities in brain growth. It has been demonstrated that HC can predict total brain volume (TBV) in very-low-birth-weight (VLBW) infants. However, the correlation between HC and TBV was weaker than that observed in healthy term-born toddlers, suggesting that there are factors that influence the relationship between HC and TBV. The aim of this study was to identify the clinical risk factors that caused a deviation from the regression line obtained between HC and TBV. METHODS: The study population was based on 37 VLBW infants, who underwent a clinical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination at a term-equivalent age, during 2013-2015, at Toyama University Hospital. The HC and the TBV were both adjusted for sex, multiple births, and postmenstrual age. The relationship between TBV/HC and clinical characteristics was evaluated. RESULTS: There was a positive correlation between HC and TBV (r = .58, P = .000168). Two clinical factors, the lower birth body weight (BBW) (r = .38, P = .02) and dolichocephaly (r = 0.46, P = .006), were identified as factors that negatively affected the TBV/HC ratio. After excluding infants with low BBW or with dolichocephaly, the correlation between HC and TBV was higher (r = .63). CONCLUSIONS: Although HC has predictive value for TBV in VLBW infants, care should be taken in infants with low BBW (BBW less than 600 g) or dolichocephaly (MRI-based cranial index less than .68), which were related to overestimation of TBV.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Measuring head circumference (HC) in infants is an easy screening procedure with which to detect abnormalities in brain growth. It has been demonstrated that HC can predict total brain volume (TBV) in very-low-birth-weight (VLBW) infants. However, the correlation between HC and TBV was weaker than that observed in healthy term-born toddlers, suggesting that there are factors that influence the relationship between HC and TBV. The aim of this study was to identify the clinical risk factors that caused a deviation from the regression line obtained between HC and TBV. METHODS: The study population was based on 37 VLBW infants, who underwent a clinical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination at a term-equivalent age, during 2013-2015, at Toyama University Hospital. The HC and the TBV were both adjusted for sex, multiple births, and postmenstrual age. The relationship between TBV/HC and clinical characteristics was evaluated. RESULTS: There was a positive correlation between HC and TBV (r = .58, P = .000168). Two clinical factors, the lower birth body weight (BBW) (r = .38, P = .02) and dolichocephaly (r = 0.46, P = .006), were identified as factors that negatively affected the TBV/HC ratio. After excluding infants with low BBW or with dolichocephaly, the correlation between HC and TBV was higher (r = .63). CONCLUSIONS: Although HC has predictive value for TBV in VLBW infants, care should be taken in infants with low BBW (BBW less than 600 g) or dolichocephaly (MRI-based cranial index less than .68), which were related to overestimation of TBV.
Authors: Anne Elisabeth Sølsnes; Kam Sripada; Anastasia Yendiki; Knut Jørgen Bjuland; Heidi Furre Østgård; Synne Aanes; Kristine Hermansen Grunewaldt; Gro C Løhaugen; Live Eikenes; Asta K Håberg; Lars M Rimol; Jon Skranes Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2015-12-20 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Dana B McCarty; Jennifer R Peat; William F Malcolm; P Brian Smith; Kimberley Fisher; Ricki F Goldstein Journal: Am J Perinatol Date: 2016-09-02 Impact factor: 1.862
Authors: Ira Adams-Chapman; Roy J Heyne; Sara B DeMauro; Andrea F Duncan; Susan R Hintz; Athina Pappas; Betty R Vohr; Scott A McDonald; Abhik Das; Jamie E Newman; Rosemary D Higgins Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2018-04-17 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: V A A Beunders; J A Roelants; J Suurland; J Dudink; P Govaert; R M C Swarte; M M A Kouwenberg-Raets; I K M Reiss; K F M Joosten; M J Vermeulen Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2022-03-24 Impact factor: 3.825