Literature DB >> 30259771

What do we mean by 'systematic' in health education systematic reviews and why it matters!

Morris Gordon1, Michelle Daniel2, Madalena Patricio3.   

Abstract

For anyone who reads the health education literature regularly, journal sections that focus on "reviews" are common, yet the use of the term "systematic" to describe these reviews is sporadic. Further, we believe this term is used in a manner in the field that does not accurately reflect the methodological implications of the term in this context. There are examples of "systematic" works that simply don't describe themselves in that way, despite a clear alignment with many of the principles of "systematic reviewing". Conversely, there are reviews that are clearly not systematic, yet describe themselves as such. In this piece, we discuss how this difficulty with methodological nomenclature has occurred and the distinct and important meaning of the term "systematic" in relation to health education reviews.

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30259771     DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2018.1504164

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Teach        ISSN: 0142-159X            Impact factor:   3.650


  2 in total

1.  The scoping review: A flexible, inclusive, and iterative approach to knowledge synthesis.

Authors:  Michael Gottlieb; Mary R C Haas; Michelle Daniel; Teresa M Chan
Journal:  AEM Educ Train       Date:  2021-07-01

2.  Analysing synthesis of evidence in a systematic review in health professions education: observations on struggling beyond Kirkpatrick.

Authors:  Gillian Maudsley; David Taylor
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2020-12
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.