| Literature DB >> 30258597 |
Richard A Atuna1, Wilberforce O Aduguba2, Abdul-Razak Alhassan2, Issah A Abukari3, Tawanda Muzhingi4, Daniel Mbongo4, Francis K Amagloh1.
Abstract
Two orange-fleshed sweet potato cultivars: Apomuden and "Nane" were grown on cow dung-, chicken manure-, compost-amended soils, and untreated soil. Apomuden is a variety, while "Nane" is being evaluated to be released in Ghana. The storage roots (SRs) were harvested at 3 months, cured by heaping the SRs and covering with the sweet potato foliage for 7 days in the field. The cured SRs were kept in an evaporative cool chamber to study the effect of soil amendment treatments on weight loss, rot, some nutrient composition, and sensory attributes. Boiled SRs were assessed by 70 untrained panelists after 7 weeks of storage based on the following: general appearance, sweetness, finger-feel firmness, and overall acceptability using a 5-point hedonic scale (1 = dislike extremely to 5 = like extremely). Percent rot for "Nane" showed a linear trend, while that of Apomuden was nonlinear. Both cultivars showed similar trends in terms of cumulative weight loss with "Nane" recording lower weight loss compared with Apomuden. A significant (p < 0.001; r = 0.71) strong positive correlation was observed between weight loss and rots. "Nane" had higher dry matter (37.15% vs. 30.19%; p < 0.001, respectively) and starch content (59.16% vs. 51.86%; p < 0.001, respectively) than Apomuden. Stored SRs grown on chicken manure-amended soil recorded the highest protein (6.41%; p < 0.001) and β-carotene (16.64 mg/100 g; p < 0.001) content than the other treatments. There was a 35% decline in β-carotene for Apomuden, while "Nane" increased by 24% at the end of the 7-week storage. "Nane," the cultivar with high dry matter content had good storage properties than Apomuden. Stored SRs cultivated on soils amended with chicken manure had higher β-carotene and protein content. All sensory attributes ranged from 3.35 to 3.68 indicating a good consumer preference for both cultivars irrespective of the soil amendment treatment applied.Entities:
Keywords: cooling; evaporative; organic; poultry; storage; sweet potato
Year: 2018 PMID: 30258597 PMCID: PMC6145229 DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.700
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Sci Nutr ISSN: 2048-7177 Impact factor: 2.863
Figure 1SRs in an evaporative cool chamber
Figure 2Effect of soil amendment on sweet potato SRs during a 7‐week storage period in Nyankpala, 2016. Bar values (Means ± SEM, n = 3). Means with the same letters are not significantly different (p > 0.05)
Figure 3Effect of soil amendment on sweet potato SRs rot during a 7‐week storage period in Nyankpala, 2016. Bar values (Means ± SEM, n = 3). Means with the same letters are not significantly different (p > 0.05)
Figure 4Sweet potato SRs rots (a), sprouts (b), and weight loss (c) over a 7‐week storage period in Nyankpala, 2016. Values are means ± SEM, n = 3
Main effects of soil amendment treatments and cultivar on SR compositional quality on dry matter basis, Nyankpala, 2016
| Treatment | Storage root compositional quality | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry matter | Fructose | Glucose | Sucrose | Starch | Protein | β‐Carotene | |
| % | g/100 g | ||||||
| Chicken manure | 33.60 ± 0.48a | 2.32 ± 0.16bc | 4.07 ± 0.20b | 12.87 ± 0.50b | 54.69 ± 0.59a | 6.41 ± 0.25a | 16.64 ± 0.50a |
| Compost | 32.92 ± 0.48a | 3.20 ± 0.16a | 5.19 ± 0.20a | 14.86 ± 0.50a | 54.66 ± 0.59a | 4.59 ± 0.25b | 13.07 ± 0.50b |
| Cow dung | 33.50 ± 0.48a | 2.73 ± 0.16ab | 4.65 ± 0.20ab | 13.86 ± 0.50ab | 55.69 ± 0.59a | 5.34 ± 0.25b | 11.99 ± 0.50b |
| Untreated | 34.67 ± 0.56a | 2.04 ± 0.19c | 3.85 ± 0.23b | 14.82 ± 0.58ab | 56.99 ± 0.69a | 5.04 ± 0.30b | 12.46 ± 0.62b |
|
| 0.149 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.031 | 0.051 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| Cultivar | |||||||
| Apomuden | 30.19 ± 0.37b | 3.60 ± 0.12a | 5.98 ± 0.15a | 15.31 ± 0.39a | 51.86 ± 0.45b | 5.09 ± 0.20b | 13.90 ± 0.38a |
| “Nane” | 37.15 ± 0.34a | 1.51 ± 0.11b | 2.91 ± 0.14b | 12.90 ± 0.35b | 59.16 ± 0.42a | 5.69 ± 0.18a | 13.18 ± 0.36a |
|
| <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.175 |
Values represent least square means ± SEM, n = 3. Least square means in the same category in a column with different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Combined effects of soil amendment treatment and cultivar on storage root compositional quality on dry matter basis, Nyankpala, in 2016
| Root compositional quality | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| %Dry matter | %Fructose | %Glucose | %Sucrose | |||||
| Apomuden | “Nane” | Apomuden | “Nane” | Apomuden | “Nane” | Apomuden | “Nane” | |
| Chicken manure | 29.65 ± 0.68a | 37.54 ± 0.68a | 3.43 ± 0.23a | 1.22 ± 0.23a | 5.57 ± 0.28a | 2.57 ± 0.28a | 14.79 ± 0.71a | 10.95 ± 0.71a |
| Compost | 29.58 ± 0.68a | 36.27 ± 0.68a | 4.44 ± 0.23a | 1.95 ± 0.23a | 6.96 ± 0.28a | 3.42 ± 0.28a | 15.08 ± 0.71a | 14.65 ± 0.71a |
| Cow dung | 30.79 ± 0.68a | 36.21 ± 0.68a | 3.93 ± 0.23a | 1.52 ± 0.23a | 6.35 ± 0.28a | 2.96 ± 0.28a | 14.72 ± 0.71a | 12.99 ± 0.71a |
| Untreated | 30.76 ± 0.89a | 38.58 ± 0.68a | 2.72 ± 0.30a | 1.35 ± 0.23a | 5.03 ± 0.37a | 2.67 ± 0.28a | 16.63 ± 0.93a | 13.01 ± 0.71a |
|
| 0.263 | 0.126 | 0.241 | 0.079 | ||||
Values represent the least square means of three samples ± SEM, n = 3. Least square means in the same category in a column with different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Changes in storage root compositional quality on dry matter basis with storage time, Nyankpala, 2016
| Cultivar | Storage time | Root compositional quality | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| %Dry matter | %Fructose | %Glucose | %Sucrose | %Starch | %Protein | ||
| Apomuden | Freshly harvested | 29.36 ± 0.48a | 4.67 ± 0.16a | 7.33 ± 0.20a | 14.90 ± 0.50a | 51.79 ± 0.59c | 4.69 ± 0.25a |
| 7 Weeks After storage | 31.03 ± 0.56a | 2.59 ± 0.16b | 4.62 ± 0.20b | 15.71 ± 0.50a | 51.92 ± 0.59c | 5.48 ± 0.25a | |
| “Nane” | Freshly harvested | 36.99 ± 0.48a | 1.64 ± 0.19c | 2.82 ± 0.23c | 10.17 ± 0.59b | 62.17 ± 0.69a | 5.39 ± 0.30a |
| 7 Weeks After storage | 37.31 ± 0.48a | 1.39 ± 0.16c | 3.00 ± 0.20c | 15.63 ± 0.50a | 56.16 ± 0.59b | 5.82 ± 0.25a | |
|
| 0.188 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.497 | |
Values represent the least square means of three samples ± SEM, n = 3. Least square means in the same category in a column with different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Figure 5Changes in β‐carotene concentration on dry matter basis of sweet potato cultivars with storage time, Nyankpala, 2016. Bar values (least square means ± SEM, n = 3). Least square means with the same letters are not significantly different (p > 0.05)
Consumer acceptability test of boiled SRs after 7 weeks storage in ZECC at Nyankpala, 2016
| Soil amendment | Sensory attributes | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| General appearance | Finger‐feel firmness | Sweetness | Overall acceptability | |
| Chicken Manure | 238.53a | 247.03a | 256.64a | 251.61a |
| Compost | 240.76a | 244.14a | 234.84a | 240.70a |
| Untreated | 308.77b | 232.47a | 257.83a | 249.66a |
| Cow dung | 226.16a | 251.71a | 239.02a | 242.17a |
|
| <0.001 | 0.804 | 0.437 | 0.890 |
| Cultivar | ||||
| Apomuden | 3.35 ± 1.04b | 3.46 ± 1.07a | 3.64 ± 1.07a | 3.68 ± 0.97a |
| “Nane” | 3.65 ± 1.12a | 3.53 ± 1.10a | 3.54 ± 1.11a | 3.65 ± 1.08a |
|
| 0.001 | 0.443 | 0.339 | 0.978 |
| Sex | ||||
| Male ( | 3.51 ± 1.11a | 3.48 ± 1.08a | 3.59 ± 1.11a | 3.67 ± 1.02a |
| Female ( | 3.59 ± 1.00a | 3.58 ± 1.08a | 3.53 ± 1.11a | 3.63 ± 1.10a |
|
| 0.455 | 0.406 | 0.597 | 0.755 |
Means/rank means in the same column with the same letters are not significantly different (p > 0.05).
*Values are rank means. †Values represent the means of three samples ± SD.