| Literature DB >> 30258596 |
Fidelis Azi1, Micheal O Odo1, Peter A Okorie1, Helen A Njoku1, Veronica N Nwobasi1, Esther David1, Theresa C Onu2.
Abstract
In this study, heavy metal and microbial safety assessment of raw and cooked pumpkin and Amaranthus viridis leaves grown in Abakaliki, Nigeria, was examined. The levels of lead (Pb), arsenic (As), chromium (Cr), cadmium (Cd), and mercury (Hg) were evaluated using atomic absorption spectrophotometer. The microbial cells were counted and further identified to species level using 16S rDNA and ITS rDNA sequencing analysis at CABI microbial identification services United Kingdom (UK). The results showed that the heavy metal concentrations of lead (10.5, 12.0), arsenic (7.5, 8.5), chromium (0.9, 0.1), and mercury (13.1, 14.0) in the pumpkin and A. viridis leaves, respectively, were above maximum acceptable limit according to relevant national and international food regulatory agencies (Tables 1 and 2). Cooking significantlyreduced the concentrations of the heavy metals at (p > 0.05) to or below, lead (6.8, 8.4), arsenic (5.1, 6.1), chromium (0.6.0.1), and mercury (9.5, 11.4) in the pumpkin and A. viridis leaves, respectively, but still not to international safe limit. The result of the microbial safety assessment showed that the microbial load of both the pumpkin and Amaranthus viridis leaves were above acceptable limit and the contaminating organisms were identified as Escherichia coli (504743), Klebsiella pneumonia (504744b), and Aspergillus flavus (504740).This study therefore shows that the vegetables (pumpkin and A. viridis leaves) contain unacceptable levels of toxic heavy metals and potentially dangerous pathogenic microorganisms, thus present significant health risk for the consumers.Entities:
Keywords: 16S rDNA; Amaranthus viridis; ITS rDNA; heavy metals; microbial safety; pumpkin
Year: 2018 PMID: 30258596 PMCID: PMC6145239 DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.739
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Sci Nutr ISSN: 2048-7177 Impact factor: 2.863
Heavy metals analysis of uncooked and cooked pumpkin leaves
| Heavy metals (mg/kg) | V1 | V1C | V2 | V2C | V3 | V3C |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pb | 10.5 ± 0.02a | 6.8 ± 0.01b | 7.8 ± 0.13c | 4.3 ± 0.03d | 9.3 ± 0.53e | 6.2 ± 0.05f |
| As | 5.3 ± 0.02a | 3.3 ± 0.02b | 4.4 ± 0.02c | 2.8 ± 0.02d | 7.5 ± 0.02e | 5.1 ± 0.02f |
| Cr | 0.9 ± 0.01a | 0.6 ± 0.05b | 0.3 ± 0.02c | 0.1 ± 0.02d | 0.0 | 0.00 |
| Cd | 0.6 ± 0.02a | 0.3 ± 0.01b | 0.1 ± 0.01c | 0.1 ± 0.00c | 0.1 ± 0.01e | 0.1 ± 0.01f |
| Hg | 13.1 ± 0.01a | 9.5 ± 0.01b | 5.7 ± 0.01c | 2.9 ± 0.02d | 7.8 ± 0.01e | 4.0 ± 0.0f |
Values are standard deviation of replicate samples.
Values with the same superscripts along the row are not statistically different (p > 0.05).
V1, V1C, V2, V2C, V3, V3C are pumpkin from locations 1, 2, 3 before and after cooking, respectively.
Heavy metal analysis of cooked and uncooked Amaranthus viridis
| Heavy metals (mg/kg) | V1 | V1C | V2 | V2C | V3 | V3C |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pb | 12.0 ± 40.02a | 8.4 ± 0.01b | 8.2 ± 0.02c | 5.3 ± 0.02d | 9.8 ± 0.01e | 6.6 ± 0.02f |
| As | 7.5 ± 0.02a | 3.9 ± 0.03b | 6.4 ± 0.02c | 4.4 ± 0.01d | 8.5 ± 0.02e | 6.1 ± 0.01f |
| Cr | 0.1 ± 0.001a | 0.1 ± 0.00b | 0.1 ± 0.00c | 0.1 ± 0.00c | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Cd | 0.9 ± 0.03a | 0.5 ± 0.01b | 0.8 ± 0.01c | 0.5 ± 0.01d | 0.8 ± 0.01e | 0.5 ± 0.01f |
| Hg | 14.0 ± 0.02a | 11.4 ± 0.01b | 8.9 ± 0.03c | 5.9 ± 0.02d | 3.8 ± 0.02e | 0.9 ± 0.01f |
Values are standard deviation of replicate samples.
Values with the same superscripts along the row are not statistically different (p > 0.05).
V1, V1C, V2, V2C, V3, V3C are pumpkin from locations 1, 2, 3 before and after cooking, respectively.
Microbial count of pumpkin leaves
| Microbial count (cfu/g) | V1 | V1C | V2 | V2C | V3 | V3C |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bacterial count | 4.8 × 108 ± 0.01a | 1.1 × 106 ± 0.01b | 3.8 × 108 ± 0.06c | 0.00 | 5 × 108 ± 0.1d | 0.00 |
| Fungi count | 8.2 × 104 ± 0.1a | 0.00 | 1.3 × 106 ± 0.01b | 0.00 | 2.8 × 106 ± 0.05d | 0.00 |
Values are standard deviation of replicate samples.
Values with the same superscripts along the row are not statistically different (p > 0.05).
V1, V1C, V2, V2C, V3, V3C are pumpkin from locations 1, 2, 3 before and after cooking, respectively.
Microbial Count of the Amarantus viridis
| Microbial count (cfu/g) | V1 | V1C | V2 | V2C | V3 | V3C |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bacterial count | 3.1 × 101 ± 0.1a | 1.7 × 106 ± 0.07b | 5.4 × 106 ± 0.05c | 0.00 | 7 × 107 ± 0.15d | 0.00 |
| Fungi count | 1.7 × 103 ± 0.1a | 0.00 | 2 × 105 ± 0.15b | 0.00 | 5 × 106 ± 0.15d | 0.00 |
Values are standard deviation of replicate samples.
Values with the same superscripts along the row are not statistically different (p > 0.05).
V1, V1C, V2, V2C, V3, V3C are pumpkin from locations 1, 2, 3 before and after cooking, respectively.
Comparison of heavy metals concentrations in the pumpkin and Amaranthus leaves to WHO/EU permissible limits
| Heavy metals (mg/kg) | P1 | A1 | P2 | A2 | P2 | A3 | WHO/EU limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pb | 10.5 | 12.0 | 7.8 | 8.2 | 9.3 | 9.8 | 0.1 |
| As | 5.3 | 7.5 | 4.4 | 6.4 | 7.5 | 8.5 | 0.1 |
| Cr | 0.9 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.3 |
| Cd | 0.6 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 0.8 | 0.02 |
| Hg | 13.1 | 14.0 | 5.7 | 8.9 | 7.8 | 3.8 | 1.0 |
P1, P2, P3 is the pumpkin leaves from the three locations, while A1, A2, A3 is the Amaranthus viridis leaves from the three locations.