Literature DB >> 30258298

An Intervention to Improve Medical Student Perception of Observation and Feedback During an Anesthesiology Clerkship.

Michael C Trawicki1, Karin L Zuegge1, Lana M Volz1, Alaa A Abd-Elsayed1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Between 2011 and 2013, medical students at a large, tertiary academic hospital reported a lower-than-expected perception of direct observation and feedback during their third- and fourth-year clinical clerkships. The anesthesiology clerkship is a team-based care model that involves an anesthesiologist, resident or anesthetist, and student. This model allows for direct supervision of all patient interactions and procedures. Despite this structure, medical students reported an acceptable but lower-than-anticipated perception of direct observation and feedback taking place during a 2-week anesthesiology clerkship.
METHODS: Interventions were proposed to improve student awareness of the supervision, teaching, and feedback taking place. A skills checklist for intravenous (IV) line placement that an anesthesia provider completed while observing the student was chosen as a meaningful intervention to improve the students' perception of observation and feedback. This checklist required direct observation of the IV line placement clinical skill, and the evaluator was directed to give oral feedback to the student. Students were surveyed regarding their perceptions of direct observation and feedback during a 4-year period, 2 years prior to and 2 years after implementation of the IV checklist.
RESULTS: No statistically significant difference was noted between the preintervention and postintervention groups.
CONCLUSION: While formal observation of and feedback on an IV placement did not change student perception, the intervention showed that a more in-depth analysis of the "educational alliance" desired during an anesthesiology clerkship is warranted, especially as medical education continues to evolve.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Checklist; clinical clerkship; clinical competence; medical education

Year:  2018        PMID: 30258298      PMCID: PMC6135281          DOI: 10.31486/toj.17.0103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ochsner J        ISSN: 1524-5012


  13 in total

Review 1.  Factor analysis methods and validity evidence: a review of instrument development across the medical education continuum.

Authors:  Angela P Wetzel
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 6.893

2.  Threats to the validity of clinical teaching assessments: what about rater error?

Authors:  Steven M Downing
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 6.251

3.  An investigation of medical student reactions to feedback: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Margaret L Boehler; David A Rogers; Cathy J Schwind; Ruth Mayforth; Jacquelyn Quin; Reed G Williams; Gary Dunnington
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 6.251

Review 4.  Assessment of procedural skills in anaesthesia.

Authors:  M D Bould; N A Crabtree; V N Naik
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2009-08-30       Impact factor: 9.166

5.  A generalizability study of a new standardized rating form used to evaluate students' clinical clerkship performances.

Authors:  C D Kreiter; K Ferguson; W C Lee; R L Brennan; P Densen
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 6.893

6.  Clinical skills training: developing objective assessment instruments.

Authors:  H M O'Connor; R C McGraw
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 6.251

7.  Feedback in clinical education: untying the Gordian knot.

Authors:  Debra F Weinstein
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 6.893

Review 8.  The "educational alliance" as a framework for reconceptualizing feedback in medical education.

Authors:  Summer Telio; Rola Ajjawi; Glenn Regehr
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 6.893

9.  The construct and criterion validity of the mini-CEX: a meta-analysis of the published research.

Authors:  Ahmed Al Ansari; Syeda Kauser Ali; Tyrone Donnon
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 6.893

10.  DOPS (Direct Observation of Procedural Skills) in undergraduate skills-lab: Does it work? Analysis of skills-performance and curricular side effects.

Authors:  Christoph Profanter; Alexander Perathoner
Journal:  GMS Z Med Ausbild       Date:  2015-10-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.