| Literature DB >> 30257936 |
Joseph L Gage1, Michael R White1, Jode W Edwards2, Shawn Kaeppler1,3, Natalia de Leon4.
Abstract
Inflorescence capacity plays a crucial role in reproductive fitness in plants, and in production of hybrid crops. Maize is a monoecious species bearing separate male and female flowers (tassel and ear, respectively). The switch from open-pollinated populations of maize to hybrid-based breeding schemes in the early 20th century was accompanied by a dramatic reduction in tassel size, and the trend has continued with modern breeding over the recent decades. The goal of this study was to identify selection signatures in genes that may underlie this dramatic transformation. Using a population of 942 diverse inbred maize accessions and a nested association mapping population comprising three 200-line biparental populations, we measured 15 tassel morphological characteristics by manual and image-based methods. Genome-wide association studies identified 242 single nucleotide polymorphisms significantly associated with measured traits. We compared 41 unselected lines from the Iowa Stiff Stalk Synthetic (BSSS) population to 21 highly selected lines developed by modern commercial breeding programs, and found that tassel size and weight were reduced significantly. We assayed genetic differences between the two groups using three selection statistics: cross population extended haplotype homozogysity, cross-population composite likelihood ratio, and fixation index. All three statistics show evidence of selection at genomic regions associated with tassel morphology relative to genome-wide null distributions. These results support the tremendous effect, both phenotypic and genotypic, that selection has had on maize male inflorescence morphology.Entities:
Keywords: GWAS; inflorescence; maize; selection; tassel
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30257936 PMCID: PMC6218240 DOI: 10.1534/genetics.118.301487
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genetics ISSN: 0016-6731 Impact factor: 4.562
Summary of traits and heritabilities
| Trait name (units) | Method | Abbreviation | Mean | SD | Heritability/repeatability | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHW65 NAM | WiDiv-942 | PHW65 NAM | WiDiv-942 | PHW65 NAM | WiDiv-942 | |||
| Tassel length (cm) | Manual | TL | 35.82 | 32.39 | 4.57 | 4.81 | 0.89 | 0.95 |
| Image | TLp | 35.83 | 34.21 | 3.36 | 3.99 | 0.63 | 0.79 | |
| Tassel weight (g) | Manual | TW | 16.11 | 15.6 | 7.16 | 6.86 | 0.94 | 0.96 |
| Image | TWp | 15.38 | 16.17 | 5.41 | 5.5 | 0.71 | 0.86 | |
| Branch number (count) | Manual | BN | 10.2 | 12.03 | 3.82 | 6.35 | 0.94 | 0.97 |
| Image | BNp | 11.1 | 12.17 | 3.81 | 3.74 | 0.70 | 0.82 | |
| Spike length (cm) | Manual | SL | 23.73 | 22.52 | 3.66 | 4.37 | 0.81 | 0.95 |
| Image | SLp | 25.36 | 22.77 | 2.62 | 3.1 | 0.63 | 0.79 | |
| Branch zone (cm) | Manual | BZ | 10.87 | 9.87 | 2.62 | 3.03 | 0.72 | 0.93 |
| Spike proportion (proportion) | Manual | SP | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.06 | 0.08 | 0.72 | 0.93 |
| Branch density (count/cm) | Manual | BD | 0.97 | 1.21 | 0.32 | 0.51 | 0.80 | 0.93 |
| Compactness (proportion) | Image | CP | 0.34 | 0.34 | 0.11 | 0.14 | 0.70 | 0.76 |
| Fractal dimension (dimension) | Image | FD | 1.42 | 1.42 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.67 | 0.81 |
| Perimeter length (pixels) | Image | PR | 10,902.52 | 10,399.72 | 3167.7 | 3585.34 | 0.68 | 0.72 |
| Skeleton length (pixels) | Image | SK | 5680.85 | 5585.8 | 2021.27 | 2377.85 | 0.72 | 0.78 |
Descriptive statistics of 15 tassel morphological traits measured in two populations. All manual traits except tassel weight were measured in three environments, while tassel weight and all image traits were measured in one environment. Means and SD were calculated from untransformed per-plot averages of measurements taken on up to three plants.
Figure 1Tassel traits show progressive changes over time. Best linear unbiased estimators (BLUEs) of 15 tassel morphological traits for 41 BSSSC0 inbreds, 16 publicly released inbreds derived from BSSS lines, and 21 ex-PVP inbreds derived from BSSS lines. Percentages indicate the percent change in mean value relative to the BSSSC0 lines. White bars indicate the median value. Letters indicate significant differences between groups (Tukey’s honest significant difference test, α = 0.05). Trait abbreviations noted with an asterisk were square root transformed before computing BLUEs. BD, branch density; BN, branch number; BZ, branch zone; CP, compactness; FD, fractal dimension; PR, perimeter length; SK, skeleton length; SL, spike length; SP, spike proportion; TL, tassel length; TW, tassel weight; TWp, TLp, SLp, and BNp: image-based predictions of TW, TL, SL, and BN.
Figure 2Physical locations and selection statistics for SNPs associated with tassel morphological traits. Values of maximum FST (top), XP-CLR (middle), and XP-EHH (bottom) in nonoverlapping 10 kb windows along the genome (black). All three statistics were conducted between 41 BSSSC0-derived inbreds and 21 ex-PVP inbreds derived from BSSS lines. Windows containing single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with tassel traits are highlighted in color; those in yellow were discovered by GWAS in the WiDiv-942 association panel, while those in red were discovered in the PHW65 NAM panel.
Figure 3Densities of selection statistics for single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with tassel morphological traits reveal enrichment for signals of selection. Distributions of selection statistics for SNPs associated with tassel morphological traits (colored), compared to genome-wide null distributions (gray) derived by circular permutation. Values of individual SNPs associated with tassel traits are represented by points along the bottom of each plot. The XP-CLR plot was truncated at 50 for better visualization. All three statistics were calculated between 41 BSSSC0-derived inbreds and 21 ex-PVP inbreds derived from BSSS lines.
Figure 4Signals of selection for tassel traits are driven by traits related to quantity and density of branches. Distribution of XP-EHH values for tassel trait associated SNPs, categorized into SNPs associated with branchiness traits (n = 141) and those associated with length traits (n = 88). The enrichment of negative XP-EHH values, suggestive of selection in the ex-PVP lines, is driven by traits related to branchiness. Open bars indicate median value.