| Literature DB >> 30255058 |
Filippo M Martini1, Anna Brandstetter de Bellesini1, Alda Miolo2, Laura Del Coco3, Francesco P Fanizzi3, Antonio Crovace4.
Abstract
Canine cranial cruciate ligament rupture (CrCLR) is a very common pathology. Surgical stabilization is the first choice treatment, although it does not fully eliminate the increased risk of osteoarthritis. This preliminary study was carried out to explore whether a newly formulated joint health supplement would benefit metabolic, clinical and radiographic changes in dogs with CrCLR surgically treated with tibial plateau leveling osteotomy (TPLO). Besides chondroitin sulfate and glucosamine hydrochloride, the studied supplement contained anti-inflammatory and antioxidant ingredients, the main ones being N-palmitoyl-D-glucosamine (Glupamid®) and quercetin. It was thus intended to target not only chondrodegenerative components of osteoarthritis, but also post-injury inflammatory response and oxidative stress of joint tissues. Thirteen dogs underwent TPLO and were randomly allocated to treatment (n = 6) and control groups (n = 7), the former receiving the joint supplement for 90 days. Lameness and radiographic osteoarthritis changes were scored before (i.e., baseline) and at 30 and 90 days post-surgery. Synovial fluid samples were collected from injured stifles at the same time points. Levels of representative metabolites were measured by proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy in a blinded fashion. In the metabolomic analysis, special attention was paid to lactate, due to its emerging recognition as a key marker of inflammation. In the last time period (from the 30th to the 90th day), lameness improved by a factor of 2.3 compared to control dogs. No significant difference was observed in the radiographic osteoarthritis score between groups. In the first postoperative month, lactate and creatine levels significantly dropped in treated compared to control dogs. Compared to surgery alone, combining the joint supplement with TPLO resulted in a trend to a better clinical outcome in the later time interval but did not influence osteoarthritis radiographic progression. A significantly better rebalance of joint microenvironment in the early time interval (baseline - 30 days) was shown by metabolomic analysis, thus suggesting that the study supplement could limit ongoing inflammatory responses.Entities:
Keywords: Cranial cruciate ligament; Dietary supplements; Dogs; N-palmitoyl-d-glucosamine; Osteoarthritis; Quercetin
Year: 2017 PMID: 30255058 PMCID: PMC6137840 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijvsm.2017.09.006
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Vet Sci Med ISSN: 2314-4599
Lameness scoring system.
| Score | Description |
|---|---|
| 1 | Stands and walks normally |
| 2 | Stands normally, slight lameness at walk |
| 3 | Stands normally, severe lameness at walk |
| 4 | Abnormal stance, slight lameness at walk |
| 5 | Abnormal stance, severe lameness at walk |
Radiographic osteoarthritis score (0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate or 3 = severe for each feature, with an absolute 0–96 score for each stifle).
| Stifle component | Radiographic feature |
|---|---|
| Patella | Apical osteophytes |
| Basal osteophytes | |
| Cranial apical enthesiopathy | |
| Femur | Trochlear groove periarticular osteophytes |
| Supratrochlear lysis | |
| Fabellar (sesamoid) periarticular osteophytes | |
| Subchondral sclerosis | |
| Distal femoral condyle remodeling | |
| Subchondral cystic lucencies (central femoral metaphysis) | |
| Subchondral cystic lucencies (intercondylar fossa) | |
| Subchondral cystic lucencies (associated with a condyle) | |
| Lateral condylar periarticular osteophytes | |
| Medial condylar periarticular osteophytes | |
| Lateral collateral ligament enthesiopathy | |
| Medial collateral ligament enthesiopathy | |
| Tibia | Cranial periarticular osteophytes |
| Caudal periarticular osteophytes | |
| Subchondral cystic lesions | |
| Condyle remodeling | |
| Central tibial plateau osteophytes | |
| Medial periarticular osteophytes | |
| Lateral periarticular osteophytes | |
| Medial subchondral sclerosis | |
| Lateral subchondral lesions | |
| Intercondylar eminence osteophytes | |
| Soft tissues | Joint effusion and/or capsular joint thickening |
| Lateral soft tissue thickening | |
| Medial soft tissue thickening | |
| Other aspects of the joint | Intracapsular mineralized osseous fragments |
| Enthesiophytes at the patellar ligament insertion on the tibia | |
| Meniscus mineralization | |
| Intercondylar avulsion fragments | |
Demographics of the enrolled dogs by group.
| Group | Breed | Gender | Age (months) | Weight (kg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | Pointer | F | 66 | 16.7 |
| Dogue de Bordeaux | M | 72 | 50 | |
| Labrador Retriever | F | 84 | 28 | |
| Mixed breed | F | 90 | 23 | |
| Italian Mastiff | M | 17 | 48 | |
| Boxer | M | 87 | 36 | |
| Labrador Retriever | SF | 84 | 33.7 | |
| T | Mixed breed | SF | 24 | 25 |
| Labrador Retriever | F | 84 | 39.5 | |
| Beagle | CM | 72 | 30 | |
| Labrador Retriever | F | 72 | 32.6 | |
| Dogue de Bordeaux | SF | 69 | 55 | |
| Labrador Retriever | M | 94 | 40.5 | |
Abbreviations: F = female; SF = spayed female; M = male; CM = castrated male; C = control group; T = treated group.
Fig. 1Carr–Purcell–Meiboom–Gill spin-echo sequence (cpmgpr 1D) spectrum and expansions in the range 4.2–3.0 ppm showing signals of the main metabolites present in canine synovial fluid samples.
Fig. 2Mean delta synovial concentration of lactate (a) and creatine (b) in the treated (dark grey) and control (light grey) groups. *P < 0.05.
Radiographic osteoarthritis scores at study time points.
| V0 | V30 | V90 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 3.90 | 4.00 | 4.40 | ||
| C | Median | 4.00 | 4.00 | 5.00 | |
| SE | 0.40 | 0.44 | 0.43 | ||
| Mean | 3.80 | 4.30 | 4.70 | ||
| T | Median | 4.00 | 4.00 | 5.0 | |
| SE | 0.48 | 0.42 | 0.42 | ||
| Mean | 15.43 | 17.86 | 20.00 | ||
| C | Median | 13.00 | 16.00 | 18.00 | |
| SE | 2.46 | 2.41 | 1.89 | ||
| Mean | 13.83 | 17.00 | 18.33 | ||
| T | Median | 13.50 | 16.50 | 17.50 | |
| SE | 1.01 | 0.93 | 1.23 | ||
| Mean | 17.71 | 20.71 | 22.57 | ||
| C | Median | 17.00 | 19.00 | 22.00 | |
| SE | 2.12 | 1.19 | 0.69 | ||
| Mean | 15.83 | 18.83 | 20.33 | ||
| T | Median | 14.50 | 19.50 | 22.00 | |
| SE | 1.74 | 1.33 | 1.38 | ||
| Mean | 6.14 | 6.57 | 6.14 | ||
| C | Median | 6.00 | 6.00 | 6.00 | |
| SE | 0.46 | 0.48 | 0.46 | ||
| Mean | 5.67 | 6.17 | 5.67 | ||
| T | Median | 6.00 | 6.00 | 6.00 | |
| SE | 0.80 | 0.91 | 0.67 | ||
| Mean | 0.43 | 1.43 | 1.57 | ||
| C | Median | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| SE | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.30 | ||
| Mean | 0.00 | 0.33 | 1.00 | ||
| T | Median | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | |
| SE | 0.00 | 0.21 | 0.45 | ||
| Mean | 43.57 | 50.57 | 54.71 | ||
| C | Median | 39.00 | 47.00 | 52.00 | |
| SE | 5.18 | 3.86 | 2.94 | ||
| Mean | 39.17 | 46.67 | 50.00 | ||
| T | Median | 38.00 | 47.50 | 53.00 | |
| SE | 3.29 | 2.45 | 2.72 | ||
Abbreviations: C = control group; T = treated group.
Fig. 3(a) Mean (±SE) lameness score over time in the treated (dark grey squares) and control (light grey squares) groups. (b) Lameness score improvement (±SE) in the V30-V90 period in the control (light grey) and treated (dark grey) groups.
Lameness scores at study time points.
| V0 | V30 | V90 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 3.71 | 1.71 | 1.57 | ||
| C | Median | 4.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| SE | 0.360 | 0.421 | 0.429 | ||
| Mean | 3.50 | 1.50 | 1.17 | ||
| T | Median | 4.00 | 1.50 | 1.00 | |
| SE | 0.500 | 0.224 | 0.167 | ||
Abbreviations: C = control group; T = treated group.