| Literature DB >> 30254908 |
Hwa Sook Moon1, Jaseong Koo1, Hyeyoung Lee2, Bo Sun Joo3.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This study is aimed to introduce a simple neovaginoplasty procedure without significant complications using the spontaneous regenerative ability of labial and vestibular advancement flaps in patients with Müllerian agenesis.Entities:
Keywords: Labial advancement flaps; Müllerian agenesis; Neovagina; Vaginoplasty
Year: 2017 PMID: 30254908 PMCID: PMC6135190 DOI: 10.1016/j.gmit.2017.06.004
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther ISSN: 2213-3070
Fig. 1Operative procedures of Neovaginoplasty using labial flap. (A) Posterior portions of both labia minora were grasped with Allis clamps. (B) A midline incision is made in the perineum from the fourchette. (C) A tunnel between the bladder and rectum is created by blunt and sharp dissections in the upward direction. (D, E) The epithelial layer of redundant labia minora and vestibulum are dissected from the underlying tissue. (F) The mobilized skin and mucosa were then moved into the created tunnel as deeply as possible but without tension of the flap. (G) The mobilized skin and mucosa are sutured to the wall of the tunnel with interrupted #3-0 polysorb sutures. (H) The adaptor is cut off from a 20 plastic syringe. (I) The trimmed syringe was placed in the vaginal cavity after surgery.
Clinical characteristics of the 5 patients.
| Patient | Age (years) | Married | Secondary sexual characteristics | Serum level | Karyotype | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FSH (mIU/ml) | E2 (μg/ml) | |||||
| 1 | 18 | No | Normal | 5.92 | 58.0 | 46 XX |
| 2 | 34 | No | Normal | 5.38 | 87.5 | 46 XX |
| 3 | 23 | No | Normal | 1.70 | 287.0 | 46 XX |
| 4 | 47 | Yes | Normal | 3.82 | 212.1 | 46 XX |
| 5 | 21 | No | Normal | 2.54 | 63.5 | 46 XX |
Operative outcomes.
| Patient | Operating time (min) | Hospital stay (days) | Duration of follow-up (months) | Vagina: length (cm) | Time to epithelialization (months) | Time to the first intercourse (months) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| At hospital discharge | At final follow-up | ||||||
| 1 | 30 | 30 | 50 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 27 |
| 2 | 40 | 22 | 25 | 9 | 13 | 20 | 19 |
| 3 | 60 | 14 | 15 | 10 | 12 | 15 | 4 |
| 4 | 50 | 10 | 7 | 10 | 10 | 10a | 3 weeks |
| 5 | 60 | 9 | 21 | 10 | 10 | 15 | 19 |
a This patient shows 80% epithelialization at postoperative 10 months.