Literature DB >> 11704130

Creation of a neovagina following Williams vaginoplasty and the Creatsas modification in 111 patients with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome.

G Creatsas1, E Deligeoroglou, E Makrakis, A Kontoravdis, L Papadimitriou.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of the Creatsas modification of Williams vaginoplasty for the creation of neovagina in patients with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome (MRKH syndrome).
DESIGN: Record of perioperative and postoperative results and complications. Follow-up evaluations of patients yearly after the operation.
SETTING: Division of Pediatric-Adolescent Gynecology and Gynecologic Corrective Surgery, University of Athens (tertiary referral center). PATIENT(S): One hundred eleven patients with MRKH syndrome. INTERVENTION(S): Surgical creation of neovagina using the Williams vaginoplasty technique (group A: 10 patients) or the Creatsas modification of the previous method (group B: 101 patients). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Length and width of the neovagina, and the quality of sexual life postoperatively. RESULT(S): A functioning vagina of 10 to 12 cm depth and 5 cm width was created in eight of the patients in group A (80%) and in 98 of those in group B (97.02%). A vagina of 7 to 9 cm depth and 2 to 3 cm width was created in the rest of the patients in both groups. In group A, two wound openings were reported (20%); in two of the patients hemorrhage occurred during the first intercourse, compared to none in group B. A satisfactory sexual life was reported from 94.4% of the patients and an adequate one from 4.16% of them. CONCLUSION(S): The Creatsas modification of Williams vaginoplasty is a simple and effective technique for the creation of a functioning neovagina in young women with vaginal aplasia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11704130     DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(01)02836-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  7 in total

Review 1.  Dilation and surgical management in vaginal agenesis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sarah K McQuillan; Sonia R Grover
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Creating neovagina using amnion.

Authors:  S K Kathpalia
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2015-12-31

3.  Consensus in Guidelines for Evaluation of DSD by the Texas Children's Hospital Multidisciplinary Gender Medicine Team.

Authors:  Ganka Douglas; Marni E Axelrad; Mary L Brandt; Elizabeth Crabtree; Jennifer E Dietrich; Shannon French; Sheila Gunn; Lefkothea Karaviti; Monica E Lopez; Charles G Macias; Laurence B McCullough; Deepa Suresh; V Reid Sutton
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Endocrinol       Date:  2010-10-17

4.  Peritoneal vaginoplasty by Luohu I and Luohu II technique: a comparative study of the outcomes.

Authors:  Aiwen Le; Zhonghai Wang; Lili Shan; Tianhui Xiao; Rong Zhuo; Guangnan Luo
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2015-08-22       Impact factor: 2.175

5.  Sexual Life of Women With Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser Syndrome After Laparoscopic Vecchietti Vaginoplasty.

Authors:  Zlatko Pastor; Jiří Froněk; Marta Nováčková; Roman Chmel
Journal:  Sex Med       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 2.491

6.  Vaginoplasty for disorders of sex development.

Authors:  Nino Guarino; Salvatore Scommegna; Silvia Majore; Anna Maria Rapone; Luciana Ungaro; Aldo Morrone; Paola Grammatico; Giacinto A Marrocco
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 5.555

7.  Simple neovaginoplasty using spontaneous regeneration ability of labial and vestibular flap in patients with Müllerian agenesis.

Authors:  Hwa Sook Moon; Jaseong Koo; Hyeyoung Lee; Bo Sun Joo
Journal:  Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther       Date:  2017-07-01
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.