| Literature DB >> 30254470 |
Qiang Tong1, Xiao-Long Wang2, Sheng-Bao Li1, Gong-Li Yang1, Shu Jin1, Zi-Ye Gao3, Xiao-Bo Liu1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The diagnosis rate of early stage esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is low due to the lack of specific tumor markers. Seeking for these markers is beneficial to improve the early diagnosis rate and the prognosis of patients. This study profiles the differentially expressed proteins of early stage ESCC patients via the AAH-BLG-507 protein chip, which further consolidates the clinical evidence of ESCC diagnosis.Entities:
Keywords: bioinformatics analysis; early stage esophageal cancer; protein chip; squamous cell carcinoma; tumor marker
Year: 2018 PMID: 30254470 PMCID: PMC6140751 DOI: 10.2147/OTT.S171242
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Onco Targets Ther ISSN: 1178-6930 Impact factor: 4.147
General clinical data of two groups
| Group | No | Gender | Age (years) | TNM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tumor group | 03 | Male | 56 | Tis |
| 18 | Male | 59 | Tis | |
| 12 | Male | 58 | Tis | |
| 15 | Male | 61 | T1N0M0 | |
| 13 | Male | 55 | Tis | |
| 08 | Female | 55 | Tis | |
| 14 | Female | 57 | Tis | |
| 09 | Female | 58 | Tis | |
| 12 | Female | 60 | Tis | |
| 04 | Female | 60 | T1N0M0 | |
| Control group | 02 | Male | 55 | – |
| 05 | Male | 59 | – | |
| 14 | Male | 60 | – | |
| 01 | Male | 54 | – | |
| 10 | Male | 61 | – | |
| 09 | Female | 62 | – | |
| 03 | Female | 59 | – | |
| 14 | Female | 60 | – | |
| 05 | Female | 58 | – | |
| 12 | Female | 61 | – |
Software and database required for the test
| Name of software | Company/website | Application |
|---|---|---|
| GenePix Pro 6.0 | Axon Instruments ( | Chip scanning analysis software |
| NCBI Protein database | Retrieval of basic protein-related information | |
| DAVID Bioinformatics Resources 6.7 | Online software for gene function enrichment analysis | |
| String database | Analysis of protein interaction | |
| Cluster 3.0 | Intel Corporation | Cluster analysis of multiple microarray data groups |
| Java TreeView | Visual display of clustering analysis results |
Figure 1(A) Protein chip scan of the tumor group (from three representative patients). (B) Protein chip scan of the control group (from three representative people).
Figure 2The differential protein expression of the cancer group and the control group.
Abbreviations: T, cancer group; C, control group.
Summary of the differentially expressed proteins between the two groups
| Differential proteins | Tumor group | Control group | FC | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AXL | 11,250.93±1,210.11 | 6,233.23±570.68 | 11.86 | <0.01 | 1.80 |
| ARTN | 15,549.25±2,122.76 | 4,529.10±992.63 | 14.87 | <0.01 | 3.43 |
| Ang2 | 21,107.42±1,434.93 | 12,170.75±973.24 | 16.31 | <0.01 | 1.73 |
| BMP7 | 12,091.91±782.90 | 6,520.23±285.57 | 21.14 | <0.01 | 1.85 |
| BDNF | 20,547.36±1,159.44 | 12,690.83±1,158.33 | 14.76 | <0.01 | 1.62 |
| CCL28 | 10,834.92±1,377.83 | 5,881.67±399.78 | 10.87 | <0.01 | 1.84 |
| CR-1 | 1,024.13±144.00 | 114.52±14.22 | 19.88 | <0.01 | 8.98 |
| E-selectin | 33,712.89±1,540.37 | 19,187.80±394.66 | 27.49 | <0.01 | 1.76 |
| IL-6 | 8,025.53±643.28 | 5,260.61±287.99 | 11.87 | <0.01 | 1.53 |
| IL-8 | 14,340.10±450.08 | 9,538.51±249.30 | 29.51 | <0.01 | 1.51 |
| MMP-8 | 7,416.76±956.49 | 15,588.92±1,669.35 | −13.29 | <0.01 | −2.07 |
| TSP1 | 7,935.50±807.15 | 14,553.21±1,128.03 | −15.09 | <0.01 | −1.83 |
| SHH | 1,371.10±106.37 | 226.11±18.60 | 33.47 | <0.01 | 6.07 |
Note: The protein expression level is downregulated when fold change (FC) is negative.
GO analysis results
| Term | C | |
|---|---|---|
| Cell motion | 6 | 2.0E–05 |
| Negative regulation of cell proliferation | 5 | 1.4E–04 |
| Angiogenesis | 4 | 2.0E–04 |
| Blood vessel morphogenesis | 4 | 5.6E–04 |
| Regulation of cell proliferation | 6 | 8.7E–04 |
| Inflammatory response | 4 | 9.3E–04 |
| Cell migration | 4 | 1.2E–03 |
| Cell motility | 4 | 2.7E–03 |
| Positive regulation of phosphorylation | 3 | 1.7E–03 |
| Regulation of cell proliferation | 5 | 2.7E–03 |
| Positive regulation of locomotion | 3 | 2.7E–03 |
| Positive regulation of phosphate metabolic process | 3 | 2.8E–03 |
| Regulation of cell adhesion | 3 | 5.3E–03 |
| Behavior | 5 | 5.5E–03 |
| Regulation of response to external stimulus | 3 | 7.0E–03 |
| Chemotaxis | 3 | 7.1E–03 |
| Positive regulation of protein modification process | 4 | 7.8E–03 |
Abbreviations: C, count; GO, Gene Ontology.
Figure 3The interaction of differential protein.
Notes: Each node represents a protein, the name is marked at the top right of the node, and different lines represent different functional associations between proteins and proteins. The red line indicates that the fusion evidence exists between the two, the green line indicates that there is a common adjacent protein, the blue line indicates that there is evidence of the presence of both, the purple line represents the laboratory data support, the yellow line represents evidence from literature searches to demonstrate associations between proteins, the blue line indicates the presence of a corresponding correlation in different databases and the black line indicates that the co-expression of evidence exists.
IL-6 and IL-8 expression levels in two groups
| Protein | ESCC (tumor), ng/mL | Healthy control, ng/mL | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IL-6 | 18.13±2.54 | 7.87±1.25 | 19.84 | <0.01 |
| IL-8 | 84.92±3.06 | 55.83±8.01 | 18.58 | <0.01 |
Abbreviation: ESCC, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Figure 4The expression of IL-6 (A) and IL-8 (B) protein was verified by ELISA.