Literature DB >> 17200341

Determination of microvessel density by quantitative real-time PCR in esophageal cancer: correlation with histologic methods, angiogenic growth factor expression, and lymph node metastasis.

Sonja Loges1, Henning Clausen, Uta Reichelt, Michael Bubenheim, Andreas Erbersdobler, Paulus Schurr, Emre Yekebas, Gunter Schuch, Jakob Izbicki, Klaus Pantel, Carsten Bokemeyer, Walter Fiedler.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis are important steps in tumor growth and dissemination and are of prognostic importance in solid tumors. The determination of microvessel density (MVD) by immunohistology is subject to considerable variability between different laboratories and observers. We compared MVD determination by immunohistology and quantitative real-time PCR and correlated the results with clinical variables. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: The expression of endothelial antigens vascular endothelial cadherin (CD144), P1H12 (CD146), tie-2, and VEGFR-2, and lymphatic endothelial markers VEGFR-3, Prox, and LYVE was assessed by quantitative PCR (qPCR) in primary surgical samples. The expression of angiogenetic growth factors VEGF-A, VEGF-C, VEGF-D, angiopoietin-1, and angiopoietin-2 was quantified by PCR and correlated with MVD and clinical variables.
RESULTS: The expression of endothelial antigens vascular endothelial cadherin (CD144), P1H12 (CD146), tie-2, and VEGFR-2 correlated with each other in 54 samples of primary esophageal cancer (P < 0.0001 for all comparisons). MVD determined immunohistologically by CD31 staining in a subgroup of 35 patients correlated significantly with the qPCR method. The expression of angiogenetic growth factors VEGF-A, VEGF-C, VEGF-D, angiopoietin-1, and angiopoietin-2 was significantly associated with MVD (P < 0.0001 for all comparisons). Analysis of the expression of lymphendothelial markers VEGFR-3, Prox, and LYVE revealed concordant results, indicating that quantification of lymphendothelial cells is possible by qPCR. The presence of lymph node metastasis on surgical specimens was significantly correlated with MVD (P < 0.003), VEGFR-2 (P < 0.048), and VEGF-C (P < 0.042) expression.
CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that quantification of MVD by qPCR in surgical samples of esophageal carcinoma yields similar results with immunohistology. Interestingly, the extent of angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis was not related in individual tumor samples. Lymph node metastases could be predicted by MVD and VEGF-C expression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17200341     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-1324

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  15 in total

1.  Identification of CD146 expression, angiogenesis, and lymphangiogenesis as progression, metastasis, and poor-prognosis related markers for gallbladder adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Wenjun Wang; Zhu-lin Yang; Jie-qiong Liu; Song Jiang; Xiong-ying Miao
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2011-11-12

2.  VEGFR-1 expression levels predict occurrence of disseminated tumor cells in the bone marrow of patients with esophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  Alexander Schultze; Isabel Ben Batalla; Sabine Riethdorf; Michael Bubenheim; Emre Yekebas; Andreas Erbersdobler; Uta Reichelt; Katharina E Effenberger; Thomas Schmidt; Jakob R Izbicki; Carsten Bokemeyer; Klaus Pantel; Walter Fiedler; Sonja Loges
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2012-04-08       Impact factor: 5.150

3.  Overexpression and interactions of interleukin-10, transforming growth factor beta, and vascular endothelial growth factor in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Mehran Gholamin; Omeed Moaven; Bahram Memar; Moein Farshchian; Hossein Naseh; Reza Malekzadeh; Masoud Sotoudeh; Mohammad Taghi Rajabi-Mashhadi; Mohammad Naser Forghani; Farid Farrokhi; Mohammad Reza Abbaszadegan
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Noninvasive multiparametric imaging of metastasis-permissive microenvironments in a human prostate cancer xenograft.

Authors:  Marie-France Penet; Arvind P Pathak; Venu Raman; Paloma Ballesteros; Dmitri Artemov; Zaver M Bhujwalla
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2009-10-27       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Angiopoietin-1 targeted RNA interference suppresses angiogenesis and tumor growth of esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Xiao-Hong Liu; Chen-Guang Bai; Yang Yuan; De-Jun Gong; Sheng-Dong Huang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-03-14       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-3 directly interacts with phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase to regulate lymphangiogenesis.

Authors:  Sanja Coso; Yiping Zeng; Kenneth Opeskin; Elizabeth D Williams
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Prognostic value of CD146 in solid tumor: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ping Zeng; Hai Li; Pei-Hua Lu; Li-Na Zhou; Min Tang; Chao-Ying Liu; Min-Bin Chen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-26       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis are downregulated in primary breast cancer.

Authors:  E-M Boneberg; D F Legler; M M Hoefer; C Ohlschlegel; H Steininger; L Füzesi; G M Beer; V Dupont-Lampert; F Otto; H-J Senn; G Fürstenberger
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Oncogenic but non-essential role of N-myc downstream regulated gene 1 in the progression of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Wei Wei; Jacqueline C Bracher-Manecke; Xiaohang Zhao; Neil H Davies; Lanping Zhou; Runna Ai; Lisa Oliver; Francois Vallette; Denver T Hendricks
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 4.742

10.  Combined detection of IL-6 and IL-8 is beneficial to the diagnosis of early stage esophageal squamous cell cancer: a preliminary study based on the screening of serum markers using protein chips.

Authors:  Qiang Tong; Xiao-Long Wang; Sheng-Bao Li; Gong-Li Yang; Shu Jin; Zi-Ye Gao; Xiao-Bo Liu
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.