| Literature DB >> 30253771 |
Girmay Tekaly1, Mekuria Kassa2, Tilahun Belete2, Hagos Tasew3, Tekelwoini Mariye4, Tsega Teshale5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pre-lacteal feeding has continued as a deep-rooted nutritional malpractice in developing countries. Pre-lacteal feeding is a barrier to the implementation of optimal breastfeeding practices and increases the risk of neonatal early-life diseases and mortality. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess pre-lacteal feeding practice and associated factors among mothers having children less than 2 years of age in Aksum town, central Tigray, Ethiopia.Entities:
Keywords: Aksum town; Children less than two years; Mothers; Pre-lacteal feeding
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30253771 PMCID: PMC6156946 DOI: 10.1186/s12887-018-1284-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Pediatr ISSN: 1471-2431 Impact factor: 2.125
Socio-demographic characteristics mothers and child, in Aksum town, central zone of Tigray. Ethiopia 2017
| Demographic variables | Frequency | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| Age of the mother ( | ||
| ≤ 19 | 18 | 3.8 |
| 20–24 | 97 | 20.3 |
| 25–29 | 202 | 42.3 |
| 30–34 | 85 | 17.8 |
| 35–39 | 53 | 11.1 |
| 40–44 | 17 | 3.6 |
| ≥ 45 | 5 | 1 |
| Family size ( | ||
| ≤ 3 | 158 | 33.1 |
| ≥ 4 | 319 | 66.9 |
| Level of educational ( | ||
| No education | 161 | 33.8 |
| Primary school (1–8) | 120 | 25.2 |
| Secondary school and above | 196 | 41.1 |
| Marital status ( | ||
| Single | 17 | 3.6 |
| Married | 407 | 85.3 |
| Widowed | 43 | 9 |
| Divorced | 10 | 2.1 |
| Religion ( | ||
| Orthodox | 396 | 83 |
| Muslim | 81 | 17 |
| Ethnicity ( | ||
| Tigrian | 473 | 99.2 |
| Amhara | 4 | 0.8 |
| Occupation ( | ||
| Housewife | 291 | 61 |
| Governmental employee | 59 | 12.4 |
| Private employee | 91 | 19.1 |
| Daily labor | 35 | 7.3 |
| Other | 1 | 0.2 |
| Number of children ( | ||
| ≤ 3 | 393 | 82.4 |
| ≥ 4 | 84 | 17.6 |
| Age of the child ( | ||
| < 6 months | 145 | 30.4 |
| 6–11 months | 141 | 29.6 |
| 12–17 months | 89 | 18.7 |
| 18–24 months | 102 | 21.4 |
| Sex of the child ( | ||
| Male | 254 | 53.2 |
| Female | 223 | 46.8 |
| Birth order ( | ||
| Birth order one | 150 | 31.4 |
| Birth order 2–3 | 239 | 50.1 |
| Birth order ≥4 | 88 | 18.4 |
| Birth spacing ( | ||
| No previous child | 150 | 31.4 |
| < 24 months | 115 | 24.1 |
| ≥ 24 months | 212 | 44.4 |
Feeding practice of mothers, in Aksum town, central zone of Tigray, 2017
| Variables | Frequency | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| Pre-lacteal feeding practice for the index child ( | ||
| Yes | 48 | 10.1 |
| No | 429 | 89.9 |
| Type of pre-lacteal ( | ||
| Formula milk | 15 | 31.3 |
| Plain water | 13 | 27.1 |
| Sugar/glucose water | 9 | 18.8 |
| Caw milk | 6 | 12.5 |
| Butter | 3 | 6.3 |
| Othera | 2 | 4.2 |
| Reason to give pre-lacteal ( | ||
| Breast problem | 16 | 33.3 |
| Breast feed for infant will cause thirsty | 13 | 27.1 |
| Maternal medical illness | 10 | 20.8 |
| For child growth | 3 | 6.3 |
| Infant feeding problem | 3 | 6.3 |
| Inadequate breast milk secretion | 2 | 4.2 |
| Cultural practice | 1 | 2.1 |
| Influence to give pre-lacteal feeding ( | ||
| Mothers own decision | 31 | 64.6 |
| Health professional | 13 | 27.1 |
| Traditional birth attendant | 3 | 6.3 |
| Grand mothers | 1 | 2.1 |
| Colostrum giving ( | ||
| Yes | 447 | 93.7 |
| No | 30 | 6.3 |
| Reason for discarding colostrum (30) | ||
| Maternal medical illness | 12 | 40 |
| My breast has no milk | 12 | 40 |
| For the child growth | 4 | 13.3 |
| Cause abdominal discomfort and diarrhea | 2 | 6.7 |
| Breast feeding initiation (477) | ||
| Within 1 h | 271 | 56.8 |
| Greater than 1 h | 206 | 43.2 |
aTenadam with water
Maternal health care service utilization of mothers, in Aksum town, Tigray, Ethiopia 2017
| Variables | Frequency | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| ANC visit ( | ||
| Yes | 461 | 96.6 |
| No | 16 | 3.4 |
| How many ( | ||
| > =4 | 341 | 71.5 |
| < 4 | 120 | 25.2 |
| Not at all | 16 | 3.4 |
| Breast feeding counseling ( | ||
| Yes | 467 | 97.9 |
| No | 10 | 2.1 |
| Place of giving birth ( | ||
| Health facility | 453 | 95 |
| At home | 24 | 5 |
| Mode of delivery ( | ||
| C/S delivery | 41 | 8.6 |
| Normal spontaneous | 436 | 91.4 |
| The person who assisted you during delivery ( | ||
| Health profession | 453 | 95 |
| Traditional birth attendant | 24 | 5 |
| PNC follow ( | ||
| Yes | 412 | 86.4 |
| No | 65 | 13.6 |
Maternal level of information on pre-lacteal feeding among mothers having children less than 24 months, in Aksum town, Tigray, Ethiopia, 2017
| Variables | Frequency | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| Advantage of Colostrum ( | ||
| Yes | 447 | 93.7 |
| No | 30 | 6.3 |
| Level of information ( | ||
| Poor level | 43 | 9 |
| Good level | 434 | 91 |
| Believe on purported PLF advantage ( | ||
| Yes | 165 | 34.6 |
| No | 312 | 65.4 |
| Reason for believing on purported advantages ( | ||
| For child health and growth | 101 | 61.2 |
| Breast feed to child cause thirty | 53 | 32.1 |
| To calm the baby | 21 | 12.7 |
| To clean infant’s bowel/throat/mouth | 7 | 4.2 |
| Otherc | 1 | 0.6 |
| Risk of PLF ( | ||
| Yes | 376 | 78.8 |
| No | 101 | 21.2 |
| Information on risks of PLF ( | ||
| Diarrhea & vomiting | 343 | 72.4 |
| Poor growth | 278 | 41.5 |
| Infection | 303 | 36.6 |
aThe medical community defines pre-lacteal feeding as (potentially) dangerous which had no any recognized benefits [39], bmultiple answer were possible, cculture
Factors associated with pre-lacteal feeding practices among mothers, in Aksum town, Tigray, Ethiopia 2017
| Variables | Pre-lacteal feeding | Crude OR (CI: 95%) | Adjusted OR (CI: 95%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | |||
| Level of education | ||||
| No education | 29(18%) | 132(82%) | 3.695(1.78,7.66) | 2.4 (0.95,5.93) |
| Primary school | 8 (6.7%) | 112(93.3%) | 1.2(0.47,3.08) | 1.145(0.39,3.38) |
| Secondary and above | 11(5.6%) | 185(94.4%) | 1 | 1 |
| Child age | ||||
| < 6 months | 16(11.3%) | 126(88.7%) | 1 | 1 |
| 6–11 months | 12(8.7%) | 126(91.3%) | 0.75(0.34,1.65) | 0.43(0.16,1.19) |
| 12-17 months | 5(5.8%) | 81(94.2%) | 0.48(0.17,1.36) | 0.434(0.13,1.41) |
| 18–24 months | 15(14.9%) | 86(85.1%) | 1.39(0.65,2.96) | 0.843(0.31,2.25) |
| Birth spacing | ||||
| No previous child | 19(12.7%) | 131(87.3%) | 2.417(1.14,5.15) | 2.931(1.21,7.09) * |
| < 24 months | 17(14.8%) | 2.891(1.33, 6.29) | 2.887(1.15,7.25) * | |
| ≥ 24 months | 12(5.7%) | 200(94.3%) | 1 | 1 |
| Colostrum giving | ||||
| Yes | 32(7%) | 425(93%) | 1 | 1 |
| No | 16(80%) | 4(20%) | 10.629(4.78, 23.61) | 6.724(2.49,18.12) * |
| Number of ANC visit | ||||
| ≥ 4 | 10(2.9%) | 331(97.1%) | 1 | 1 |
| < 4 | 38(27.9%) | 98(72.1%) | 11.529 (5.44, 24.41) | 10.549 (4.76, 23.40) * |
| Breast feeding counselinga | ||||
| Yes | 45(9.6%) | 422(90.4%) | 1 | 1 |
| No | 3(30%) | 7(70%) | 4.019(1.00, 16.09) | 0.648(0.07,6.2) |
| Place of deliverya | ||||
| Heath facility | 40(8.7%) | 418(91.3%) | 1 | 1 |
| At home | 8(42.1%) | 11(57.9%) | 5.162(2.08, 12.81) | 1.192(0.03,4.77) |
| Mode of delivery | ||||
| Normal | 37(8.5%) | 399(91.5%) | 1 | 1 |
| C/S | 11(26.8%) | 30(73.2%) | 3.954(1.83,8.53) | 4.377 (1.72,11.12) |
| PNC follow upa | ||||
| Yes | 36(8.7%) | 376(91.3%) | 1 | 1 |
| No | 12(18.5%) | 53(81.5%) | 2.365(1.16, 4.83) | 1.323(0.47,3.70) |
| Believe on purported advantage of PLF | ||||
| Yes | 30(18.2%) | 135(81.8%) | 3.63(1.95, 6.81) | 3.359 (1.62,6.96) |
| No | 18(5.8%) | 294(94.2%) | 1 | 1 |
| Risk of PLFa | ||||
| Yes | 28(7.4%) | 348(92.6%) | 1 | 1 |
| No | 20(19.8%) | 81(80.2%) | 3.069(1.65, 5.72) | 1.454(0.58,3.64) |
| Family sizea | ||||
| < =3 | 21(13.3%) | 137(86.7%) | 1 | 1 |
| > =4 | 27(8.5%) | 292(91.5%) | 0.603(0.33,1.10) | 1.403(0.35,5.67) |
*Statistically significant variables at p-value of < 0.05
aVariable excluded after adjusting them in multivariate logistic regression