| Literature DB >> 26858835 |
Abate Bekele Belachew1, Alemayehu Bayray Kahsay1, Yemane Gabremariam Abebe1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Ethiopia is a country with low optimal breast feeding practice, and prelacteal feeding is still a norm. Introduction of prelacteal feeding is a known barrier for optimal breast feeding practices. However, knowledge on determinants of introduction of prelacteal feeding is minimal. This study aimed to identify the effects of individual and community-level factors in the introduction of prelacteal feeding in Ethiopia.Entities:
Keywords: Ethiopia; Multilevel factors; Optimal breastfeeding; Prelacteal feeding
Year: 2016 PMID: 26858835 PMCID: PMC4745177 DOI: 10.1186/s13690-016-0117-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arch Public Health ISSN: 0778-7367
Fig. 1Conceptual frame-work of determinants of introduction of prelacteal feeding
Types of prelacteal feeds that were given for children, Ethiopia 2011
| Type of prelacteal given | Numbera |
|---|---|
| Milk (other than breast milk) | 323 |
| Plain water | 395 |
| Sugar or glucose water | 292 |
| Gripe water | 4 |
| Sugar-salt-water solution | 176 |
| Fruit juice | 2 |
| Infant formula | 34 |
| Tea/infusions | 65 |
| Honey | 8 |
| Fresh butter | 1143 |
| Fenugreek | 42 |
| Other | 116 |
Note: aMultiple responses were possible and individual-level sampling weights were used
Introduction of prelacteal feeding by background individual and community-level characteristics of children (N = 7692), Ethiopia 2011
| Variables | Received prelacteal; % | Total; |
|---|---|---|
| Individual-level variables | ||
| Ethnicity | ||
| Afar | 26.05 | 62(0.80) |
| Amhara | 44.94 | 2,198(28.57) |
| Oromo | 24.92 | 2,689(34.96) |
| Somali | 74.07 | 184(2.39) |
| Tigrie | 26.38 | 508(6.61) |
| Others ethnic groups (Guragie, Berta…) | 13.66 | 2051(26.67) |
| Religion | ||
| Protestant | 10.26 | 1,727(22.46) |
| Orthodox | 38.14 | 3,234(42.04) |
| Muslim | 30.51 | 2,484(32.29) |
| Others (traditional…) | 22.59 | 247(3.21) |
| Household wealth quintiles | ||
| Poorest | 38.31 | 1,686(21.92) |
| Poorer | 31.06 | 1,659(21.57) |
| Middle | 27.27 | 1,588(20.65) |
| Richer | 22.36 | 1,465(19.04) |
| Richest | 23.37 | 1,294(16.83) |
| Mothers age at birth | ||
| Less than 25 years | 30.96 | 3,000(39.00) |
| 25–34 years | 25.39 | 3,431(44.60) |
| 35+ | 33.64 | 1,261(16.39) |
| Mothers level of education | ||
| No education | 31.5 | 5,141(66.84) |
| Primary education | 23.16 | 2,198(28.57) |
| Secondary & higher | 27.12 | 353(4.58) |
| Mothers has job | ||
| No | 26.81 | 3,486(45.32) |
| Yes | 30.66 | 4,206(54.68) |
| Mothers media exposed | ||
| No | 32.43 | 3,130(40.69) |
| Yes | 26.51 | 4,562(59.31) |
| ANC visit | ||
| No visit | 32.41 | 4,425(57.53) |
| 1–3 visits | 26.31 | 1,816(23.60) |
| > = 4 visits | 21.52 | 1,451(18.86) |
| Delivery assistance | ||
| Other person | 29.9 | 6,739(87.61) |
| Health personnel (Midwife, Nurse …) | 21.97 | 953(12.39) |
| Mode of delivery | ||
| Other mode | 28.85 | 7,564(98.33) |
| Caesarean delivery | 32.67 | 128(1.67) |
| Place of delivery | ||
| Health facility | 21.86 | 875(11.37) |
| Home | 29.82 | 6,817(88.63) |
| Initiation of breastfeeding | ||
| Early | 16.16 | 4,043(52.56) |
| Late | 43.05 | 3,649(47.44) |
| Perceived size of child at birth | ||
| Small | 34.96 | 2,405(31.26) |
| Middle | 25.93 | 3,019(39.25) |
| Large | 26.47 | 2,268(29.49) |
| Sex of child | ||
| Female | 27.51 | 3,735(48.56) |
| Male | 30.24 | 3,956(51.44) |
| Birth order | ||
| 1st | 33.86 | 1,357(17.65) |
| 2nd and 3rd | 27.03 | 2,401(31.21) |
| 4th+ | 28.36 | 3,934(51.14) |
| Community-level variables | ||
| Place of residence | ||
| Urban | 25.06 | 1,132(14.72) |
| Rural | 29.58 | 6,560(85.28) |
| Contextual region | ||
| City dwellers | 26.66 | 227(2.95) |
| Agrarian | 27.75 | 7,202(93.63) |
| Pastoralist | 62.65 | 263(3.42) |
| Community ANC utilization | ||
| Low | 38.04 | 2,515(32.70) |
| Middle | 25.83 | 4,326(56.24) |
| High | 17.65 | 851(11.06) |
| Community media exposure | ||
| Low | 37.00 | 1,582(20.57) |
| Middle | 27.00 | 5,315(69.10) |
| High | 21.00 | 795(10.33) |
| Community women average year of schooling | ||
| Low | 33.02 | 4,830(62.79) |
| High | 21.99 | 2,862(37.21) |
Note: Number and Percentages were weighted using individual-level sampling weights
Factors associated with introduction of prelacteal feeding in Ethiopia 2011 (n = 7540)
| Variables | AOR (95 % CI) |
|---|---|
| Individual-level variables | |
| Ethnicity | |
| Afar | 1.00 |
| Amhara | 5.46(3.07, 9.72)*** |
| Oromo | 3.94(2.24, 6.90)*** |
| Somali | 7.78(4.56,13.24)*** |
| Tigrie | 3.25(1.69, 6.25)*** |
| Other ethnic groups | 3.06(1.72, 5.45)*** |
| Religion | |
| Protestant | 1.00 |
| Orthodox | 1.82(1.32, 2.48)*** |
| Muslim | 1.48 (1.07, 2.06)* |
| Others (traditional & others) | 1.04 (0.64, 1.68) |
| Household wealth quintiles | |
| Poorest | 1.00 |
| Poorer | 0.88(0.72, 1.08) |
| Middle | 0.79(0.64, 0.99)* |
| Richer | 0.77(0.62, 0.97)* |
| Richest | 0.72(0.54, 0.98)* |
| Delivery assistance | |
| Other person | 1.00 |
| Health personnel | 0.68(0.54, 0.87)** |
| Mode of delivery | |
| Other mode | 1.00 |
| Cesarean delivery | 1.87(1.28, 2.73)** |
| Initiation of breastfeeding | |
| Early (within 1 h) | 1.00 |
| Late | 5.32(4.65, 6.09)*** |
| Perceived size of child at birth | |
| Small | 1.00 |
| Middle | 0.83(0.72, 0.97)* |
| Large | 0.80(0.68, 0.95)* |
| Community-level variables | |
| Contextual region | |
| City dwellers | 1.00 |
| Agrarian | 0.37(0.26, 0.53)*** |
| Pastoralist | 2.0(1.18, 3.40)*** |
| Community ANC utilization | |
| Low | 1.00 |
| Middle | 0.75(0.56, 0.99)* |
| High | 0.58(0.38, 0.87)* |
Significant at: *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001. AOR Adjusted odds ratio
Community-level variance of two-level mixed effect logit models predicting introduction of prelacteal feeding, Ethiopia 2011
| Random effect | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Community-level variance | 2.10* | 1.37* | 1.81* | 1.20* |
| ICC (%) | 38.96 | 29.39 | 35.49 | 26.72 |
| PCV | Reference | 34.76 | 13.80 | 42.86 |
| Model fit statistics (AIC)a | 8054 | 7293 | 7990 | 7216 |
Note: *significant at p < 0.001; aAIC (Akaike information criterion); Model 1-Empty (null) model; Model 2- Only individual-level explanatory variables included in the model; Model 3-Only community-level explanatory variables included in the model; Model 4-Combined model PCV (Proportional Change in Variance)