Literature DB >> 30252028

Effect of an intra-aortic balloon pump with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation on mortality of patients with cardiogenic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis†.

Yongnan Li1,2, Shujie Yan2, Sizhe Gao2, Mingyue Liu2, Song Lou2, Gang Liu2, Bingyang Ji2, Bingren Gao1.   

Abstract

An intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) concomitant with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is frequently used to support patients with refractory cardiogenic shock (CS). Because of the lack of evidence of the adjunctive benefit, the goal of the study was to compare the effect of VA-ECMO plus IABP with that of VA-ECMO alone. Systematic searches were conducted to identify studies using PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. Studies reporting on patients with adult CS treated with VA-ECMO plus IABP or VA-ECMO alone were identified and included. The primary outcome was in-hospital death. The secondary outcomes included neurological, gastrointestinal and limb-related complications. The study protocol was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42017069259). A total of 29 studies comprising 4576 patients were included. The pooled in-hospital deaths of patients on VA-ECMO were 1441/2285 (63.1%) compared with 1339/2291 (58.4%) for patients with adjunctive IABP. VA-ECMO plus IABP was associated with decreased in-hospital deaths [risk ratio (RR) 0.90; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.85-0.95; P < 0.0001]. Moreover, IABP was related to decreased in-hospital deaths of patients with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation, postcardiotomy CS and ischaemic heart disease (RR 0.78; 95% CI 0.64-0.95; P = 0.01; RR 0.91; 95% CI: 0.85-0.98; P = 0.008; RR 0.83; 95% CI 0.73-0.96, P = 0.009). Neurological, gastrointestinal and limb-related complications did not differ significantly between patients on ECMO with and without concurrent IABP. VA-ECMO plus IABP was associated with decreased in-hospital deaths in patients with CS.
© The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiogenic shock ; Intra-aortic balloon pumping ; Meta-analysis; Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

Year:  2019        PMID: 30252028     DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezy304

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  12 in total

1.  Intra-aortic balloon pump: is the tide turning?

Authors:  Sandro Gelsomino; Daniel M Johnson; Roberto Lorusso
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 2.  Utilization of Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices in Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction and High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.

Authors:  Rabea Asleh; Jon R Resar
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 4.241

3.  Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation timing: A new numerical model for programming and training in the clinical environment.

Authors:  Claudio De Lazzari; Beatrice De Lazzari; Attilio Iacovoni; Silvia Marconi; Silvia Papa; Massimo Capoccia; Roberto Badagliacca; Carmine Dario Vizza
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 5.428

4.  Outcomes of VA-ECMO with and without Left Centricular (LV) Decompression Using Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumping (IABP) versus Other LV Decompression Techniques: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Pan Pan; Peng Yan; Dawei Liu; Xiaoting Wang; Xiang Zhou; Yun Long; Kun Xiao; Weiguo Zhao; Lixin Xie; Longxiang Su
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2020-07-30

5.  ECMELLA: successful rescue cardiopulmonary support in post-coronary artery bypass graft cardiogenic shock with cardiac arrest-case report.

Authors:  Zara Chan Nogueira; Sara Trevas; Hilaryano Ferreira; Hugo Côrte-Real
Journal:  Eur Heart J Case Rep       Date:  2020-11-09

6.  Efficacy of left ventricular unloading strategies during venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in patients with cardiogenic shock: a protocol for a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Pengbin Zhang; Shilin Wei; Kerong Zhai; Jian Huang; Xingdong Cheng; Zhenze Tao; Bingren Gao; Debin Liu; Yongnan Li
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-10-19       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 7.  Mechanical circulatory support in patients with cardiogenic shock not secondary to cardiotomy: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Stefano Benenati; Matteo Toma; Claudia Canale; Rocco Vergallo; Roberta Della Bona; Davide Ricci; Marco Canepa; Gabriele Crimi; Francesco Santini; Pietro Ameri; Italo Porto
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2021-03-06       Impact factor: 4.654

8.  Neurological Complications of Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Retrospective Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Yinan Luo; Qiao Gu; Xin Wen; Yiwei Li; Weihua Peng; Ying Zhu; Wei Hu; Shaosong Xi
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-07-01

Review 9.  Pulmonary complications associated with veno-arterial extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Aurélien Roumy; Lucas Liaudet; Marco Rusca; Carlo Marcucci; Matthias Kirsch
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  Mechanical circulatory support and intravascular lithotripsy in high-risk patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a case series.

Authors:  Alfredo Marchese; Giuseppe Tarantini; Antonio Tito; Vito Margari; Fabrizio Resta; Ilir Dhojniku; Domenico Paparella; Giuseppe Speziale
Journal:  Eur Heart J Case Rep       Date:  2021-12-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.