Literature DB >> 30251755

Insufficient task-outcome association promotes task procrastination through a decrease of hippocampal-striatal interaction.

Shunmin Zhang1, Benjamin Becker2, Qi Chen3, Tingyong Feng1,4.   

Abstract

Theories on procrastination propose that associating tasks with higher valued incentive outcomes results in less task procrastination. However, it remains unknown how representation of incentive outcomes and task-outcome association are mediated by the human brain. Using event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging, we scanned human participants while they were thinking about both tasks and the incentive outcomes each task can yield in an unconstrained way. Results showed that tasks that are more likely to be procrastinated are associated with less value in incentive outcomes. Interestingly, procrastination was more likely if it was more difficult for participants to associate a task with its valued incentives when thinking about the task (i.e., the decreased task-outcome association). On the neural level, higher value of rewarding outcomes was correlated with increased putamen activations, which further negatively predicted task procrastination. On the other hand, when participants were associating tasks with the incentive outcomes, the decreasing task-outcome association corresponded to decreasing activation in putamen, and a decreasing hippocampus-putamen coupling which further mediated the effect of the insufficient task-outcome association on procrastination. In particular, the current findings show that procrastination is more likely when people are less able to associate tasks with highly valued incentives, which is accompanied by reduced hippocampal-striatal interactions during task construction.
© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  hippocampus-putamen coupling; procrastination; putamen; task-outcome association

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30251755      PMCID: PMC6865818          DOI: 10.1002/hbm.24397

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  48 in total

1.  Lesions of dorsolateral striatum preserve outcome expectancy but disrupt habit formation in instrumental learning.

Authors:  Henry H Yin; Barbara J Knowlton; Bernard W Balleine
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.386

2.  Inactivation of dorsolateral striatum enhances sensitivity to changes in the action-outcome contingency in instrumental conditioning.

Authors:  Henry H Yin; Barbara J Knowlton; Bernard W Balleine
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2005-09-08       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Liking is for doing: the effects of goal pursuit on automatic evaluation.

Authors:  Melissa J Ferguson; John A Bargh
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2004-11

Review 4.  Orbitofrontal cortex, associative learning, and expectancies.

Authors:  Geoffrey Schoenbaum; Matthew Roesch
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2005-09-01       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Dissociable roles of the ventral, medial and lateral striatum on the acquisition and performance of a complex visual stimulus-response habit.

Authors:  P J Reading; S B Dunnett; T W Robbins
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  1991-11-26       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 6.  Cortical and basal ganglia contributions to habit learning and automaticity.

Authors:  F Gregory Ashby; Benjamin O Turner; Jon C Horvitz
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2010-03-05       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  Episodic future thinking.

Authors:  Cristina M. Atance; Daniela K. O'Neill
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2001-12-01       Impact factor: 20.229

8.  Dopamine-dependent prediction errors underpin reward-seeking behaviour in humans.

Authors:  Mathias Pessiglione; Ben Seymour; Guillaume Flandin; Raymond J Dolan; Chris D Frith
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-08-23       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 9.  Learning and memory functions of the Basal Ganglia.

Authors:  Mark G Packard; Barbara J Knowlton
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2002-03-27       Impact factor: 12.449

10.  Computational framework explains how animals select actions with rewarding outcomes.

Authors:  Janelle Weaver
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  4 in total

1.  Hybrid brain model accurately predict human procrastination behavior.

Authors:  Zhiyi Chen; Rong Zhang; Jiawei Xie; Peiwei Liu; Chenyan Zhang; Jia Zhao; Justin Paul Laplante; Tingyong Feng
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 3.473

2.  Insufficient task-outcome association promotes task procrastination through a decrease of hippocampal-striatal interaction.

Authors:  Shunmin Zhang; Benjamin Becker; Qi Chen; Tingyong Feng
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  The effect of conscientiousness on procrastination: The interaction between the self-control and motivation neural pathways.

Authors:  Kanxin Gao; Rong Zhang; Ting Xu; Fan Zhou; Tingyong Feng
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2021-01-09       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  A neuro-computational account of procrastination behavior.

Authors:  Raphaël Le Bouc; Mathias Pessiglione
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 17.694

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.