Literature DB >> 30251139

Evaluation of the rate of marginal ulcer formation after bariatric surgery using the MBSAQIP database.

Benjamin Clapp1,2, Joshua Hahn3, Christopher Dodoo3, Angela Guerra3, Elizabeth de la Rosa3, Alan Tyroch3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Marginal ulcer (MU) formation is a known problem after gastric bypass. The Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) database contains data from all US and Canadian Centers of Excellence including complication rates. We hypothesized that the short-term rate of ulceration is low.
METHODS: We queried the MBSAQIP database for the year 2015. We searched patients with primary gastric bypass who developed MU. We then compared preoperative, operative, and postoperative characteristics with patients who did not develop MU.
RESULTS: The incidence of MU in the entire cohort of GB patients was 155 of 44,379 (0.35%, 95% CI 0.297%, 0.409%). Among the 155 patients with an ulcer, 88 (57%) patients had only one procedure, 69 had an intervention (therapeutic or diagnostic endoscopy), 16 had readmission, and 3 had reoperation. 65 patients (42%) had two procedures with the majority having both readmissions and endoscopy (n = 59); and two patients (1%) had three procedures. Ulcer formation was most common in the intervention group (11.4%). The occurrence of ulcer formation was associated with unplanned ICU admissions (6.45%), transfusions (5.16%), postoperative UTI (3.87%), sepsis (1.94%), and myocardial infarction (0.65%). Death occurred in 76 patients with no related cases to MUs. The risk of ulcer was associated with increased BMI (OR 1.02, p = 0.01), presence of percutaneous transluminal cardiac catheterization (PTC) (2.17, p = 0.038), histories of DVT (1.72, p = 0.085), and pulmonary embolism (2.84, p = 0.002).
CONCLUSIONS: In a nationally reported database, symptomatic MUs rarely occur in the first month. The large majority are diagnosed and treated endoscopically with minimal need for surgical intervention. The risk of anastomotic ulcer was increased with increased BMI, need for PTC, and history of DVT/PE.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anastomotic ulcer; Gastric bypass; MBSAQIP database; Marginal ulcer

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30251139     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-018-6468-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  4 in total

1.  Incidence and Prognostic Factors for the Development of Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Marginal Ulcers After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Procedures.

Authors:  Julian Süsstrunk; Lara Wartmann; Diana Mattiello; Thomas Köstler; Urs Zingg
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 4.129

2.  Quality of MBSAQIP data: bad luck, or lack of QA plan?

Authors:  K Noyes; A A Myneni; S D Schwaitzberg; A B Hoffman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Areas of Non-Consensus Around One Anastomosis/Mini Gastric Bypass (OAGB/MGB): A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Mohammad Kermansaravi; Amir Hossein DavarpanahJazi; Shahab ShahabiShahmiri; Miguel Carbajo; Antonio Vitiello; Chetan D Parmar; Mario Musella
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 4.129

4.  The Choice of Gastric Bypass or Sleeve Gastrectomy for Patients Stratified by Diabetes Duration and Body Mass Index (BMI) level: Results from a National Registry and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mengyi Li; Na Zeng; Yang Liu; Wenmao Yan; Songhai Zhang; Liangping Wu; Shaozhuang Liu; Jun Wang; Xiangwen Zhao; Jianli Han; Jiansheng Kang; Nengwei Zhang; Peng Zhang; Rixing Bai; Zhongtao Zhang
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 4.129

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.