Yugang Cheng1, Xin Huang1, Dong Wu1, Qiaoran Liu1, Mingwei Zhong1, Teng Liu1, Xiang Zhang1, Guangyong Zhang1, Sanyuan Hu1, Shaozhuang Liu2. 1. Department of General Surgery, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, No.107 Wenhua West Road Lixia District, Jinan, 250012, Shandong Province, China. 2. Department of General Surgery, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, No.107 Wenhua West Road Lixia District, Jinan, 250012, Shandong Province, China. liushaozhuang@sdu.edu.cn.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) plus procedures have been developed to strengthen the effect of SG on diabetes control. The aim of this study was to compare diabetes control after SG plus bypass of the proximal small intestine with SG alone under adverse conditions for diabetes remission. METHODS: SG plus duodenojejunal bypass (SG-DJB), SG plus jejunojejunal bypass (SG-JJB), SG alone, and sham surgeries were performed in diabetic rats. A high-fat diet (HFD) was fed postoperatively to induce diabetes recurrence. Body weight, food intake, glucose tolerance, insulin sensitivity, serum hormones, hepatic function, and lipid profiles were measured postoperatively. RESULTS: SG-DJB, SG-JJB, and SG groups exhibited significant improvement in glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity compared with the sham-operated group at 2 weeks postoperatively. Postoperative HFD induced obvious diabetes relapse and re-impaired insulin sensitivity at 16 weeks postoperatively. The SG-DJB and SG-JJB groups exhibited superior glucose tolerance and similar insulin sensitivity to SG alone at 16 weeks postoperatively. Compared with the SG alone, the SG-DJB and SG-JJB groups exhibited similar food intake, weight loss, fasting ghrelin, glucose-stimulated insulin secretion, and higher glucose-stimulated GLP-1 secretion. CONCLUSION: SG-DJB and SG-JJB provided better diabetes control than SG alone in rats fed a HFD postoperatively. Further clinical studies are expected to confirm the superiority of SG plus bypass of proximal small intestine.
BACKGROUND: Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) plus procedures have been developed to strengthen the effect of SG on diabetes control. The aim of this study was to compare diabetes control after SG plus bypass of the proximal small intestine with SG alone under adverse conditions for diabetes remission. METHODS: SG plus duodenojejunal bypass (SG-DJB), SG plus jejunojejunal bypass (SG-JJB), SG alone, and sham surgeries were performed in diabeticrats. A high-fat diet (HFD) was fed postoperatively to induce diabetes recurrence. Body weight, food intake, glucose tolerance, insulin sensitivity, serum hormones, hepatic function, and lipid profiles were measured postoperatively. RESULTS: SG-DJB, SG-JJB, and SG groups exhibited significant improvement in glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity compared with the sham-operated group at 2 weeks postoperatively. Postoperative HFD induced obvious diabetes relapse and re-impaired insulin sensitivity at 16 weeks postoperatively. The SG-DJB and SG-JJB groups exhibited superior glucose tolerance and similar insulin sensitivity to SG alone at 16 weeks postoperatively. Compared with the SG alone, the SG-DJB and SG-JJB groups exhibited similar food intake, weight loss, fasting ghrelin, glucose-stimulated insulin secretion, and higher glucose-stimulated GLP-1 secretion. CONCLUSION: SG-DJB and SG-JJB provided better diabetes control than SG alone in rats fed a HFD postoperatively. Further clinical studies are expected to confirm the superiority of SG plus bypass of proximal small intestine.
Entities:
Keywords:
Diabetes recurrence; High-fat diet; Sleeve gastrectomy; Sleeve gastrectomy with bypass of proximal small intestine
Authors: Silas M Chikunguwo; Luke G Wolfe; Patricia Dodson; Jill G Meador; Nancy Baugh; John N Clore; John M Kellum; James W Maher Journal: Surg Obes Relat Dis Date: 2009-11-10 Impact factor: 4.734
Authors: Lars Sjöström; Markku Peltonen; Peter Jacobson; Sofie Ahlin; Johanna Andersson-Assarsson; Åsa Anveden; Claude Bouchard; Björn Carlsson; Kristjan Karason; Hans Lönroth; Ingmar Näslund; Elisabeth Sjöström; Magdalena Taube; Hans Wedel; Per-Arne Svensson; Kajsa Sjöholm; Lena M S Carlsson Journal: JAMA Date: 2014-06-11 Impact factor: 56.272