Michael Chao1,2,3, Daryl Lim Joon4, Vincent Khoo4,5,6,7, Nathan Lawrentschuk4, Huong Ho8, Sandra Spencer8, Yee Chan4,9, Alwin Tan10, Trung Pham11, Shomik Sengupta4,12, Kevin McMillan9,12, Madalena Liu9, George Koufogiannis9, Chee Wee Cham10, Farshad Foroudi4, Damien Bolton4,9. 1. Genesis Cancer Care Victoria, 36 Mt Dandenong Road, Ringwood East, VIC, 3135, Australia. Michael.Chao@genesiscare.com.au. 2. The Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, Australia. Michael.Chao@genesiscare.com.au. 3. Ringwood Private Hospital, Ringwood East, Australia. Michael.Chao@genesiscare.com.au. 4. The Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, Australia. 5. University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia. 6. Monash University, Melbourne, Australia. 7. Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK. 8. Genesis Cancer Care Victoria, 36 Mt Dandenong Road, Ringwood East, VIC, 3135, Australia. 9. Ringwood Private Hospital, Ringwood East, Australia. 10. The Bays Hospital, Mornington, Australia. 11. The Valley Private Hospital, Mulgrave, Australia. 12. The Box Hill Hospital, Box Hill, Australia.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether the degree of prostate to rectal separation using a hydrogel spacer (HS) and its effect on decreasing rectal dose can be reproduced in the community setting. METHODS:Thirty one patients with cT1-3aN0M0 prostate adenocarcinoma receiving radical radiotherapy to 78 Gy were recruited to the study. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving at least 25% reduction in volume of rectum receiving 70 Gy (rV70). Other endpoints included degree of prostate to rectum separation, HS insertion-related adverse events and the proportion of patients with grade 1 or worse acute or late gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicity. RESULTS: All patients had successful insertion of their HS with no peri-operative toxicity. The mean prostate-rectal separation achieved was 10.5 mm. Twenty nine (93.5%) patients achieved a reduction in rV70 of at least 25%. Acute grade 1 GI toxicity was reported in 3 patients. All symptoms had resolved by 3 months post RT. Late grade 1 GI toxicity was reported in one patient (3.2%) with bowel frequency occurring at 6 months and resolving by 12 months post RT. There was no grade 2 or 3 acute or late GI toxicity seen. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, this study illustrates that the application and benefits of HS on reducing GI rectal dose endpoints and toxicities during prostate cancer RT can be reliably replicated in a community setting similar to centres participating in the randomised trial under high quality assurance trial monitoring.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether the degree of prostate to rectal separation using a hydrogel spacer (HS) and its effect on decreasing rectal dose can be reproduced in the community setting. METHODS: Thirty one patients with cT1-3aN0M0 prostate adenocarcinoma receiving radical radiotherapy to 78 Gy were recruited to the study. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving at least 25% reduction in volume of rectum receiving 70 Gy (rV70). Other endpoints included degree of prostate to rectum separation, HS insertion-related adverse events and the proportion of patients with grade 1 or worse acute or late gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicity. RESULTS: All patients had successful insertion of their HS with no peri-operative toxicity. The mean prostate-rectal separation achieved was 10.5 mm. Twenty nine (93.5%) patients achieved a reduction in rV70 of at least 25%. Acute grade 1 GI toxicity was reported in 3 patients. All symptoms had resolved by 3 months post RT. Late grade 1 GI toxicity was reported in one patient (3.2%) with bowel frequency occurring at 6 months and resolving by 12 months post RT. There was no grade 2 or 3 acute or late GI toxicity seen. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, this study illustrates that the application and benefits of HS on reducing GI rectal dose endpoints and toxicities during prostate cancer RT can be reliably replicated in a community setting similar to centres participating in the randomised trial under high quality assurance trial monitoring.
Authors: Michael Pinkawa; Nuria Escobar Corral; Mariana Caffaro; Marc D Piroth; Richard Holy; Victoria Djukic; Gundula Otto; Felix Schoth; Michael J Eble Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2011-09-29 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Deborah A Kuban; Susan L Tucker; Lei Dong; George Starkschall; Eugene H Huang; M Rex Cheung; Andrew K Lee; Alan Pollack Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2007-08-31 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Stephanie T H Peeters; Wilma D Heemsbergen; Peter C M Koper; Wim L J van Putten; Annerie Slot; Michel F H Dielwart; Johannes M G Bonfrer; Luca Incrocci; Joos V Lebesque Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-05-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Michael Pinkawa; Jens Klotz; Victoria Djukic; Carolin Schubert; Nuria Escobar-Corral; Mariana Caffaro; Marc D Piroth; Richard Holy; Michael J Eble Journal: Urology Date: 2013-10 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Neil Mariados; John Sylvester; Dhiren Shah; Lawrence Karsh; Richard Hudes; David Beyer; Steven Kurtzman; Jeffrey Bogart; R Alex Hsi; Michael Kos; Rodney Ellis; Mark Logsdon; Shawn Zimberg; Kevin Forsythe; Hong Zhang; Edward Soffen; Patrick Francke; Constantine Mantz; Peter Rossi; Theodore DeWeese; Daniel A Hamstra; Walter Bosch; Hiram Gay; Jeff Michalski Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2015-04-23 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Carlos Vargas; Alvaro Martinez; Larry L Kestin; Di Yan; Inga Grills; Donald S Brabbins; David M Lockman; Jian Liang; Gary S Gustafson; Peter Y Chen; Frank A Vicini; John W Wong Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2005-08-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Daniel A Hamstra; Neil Mariados; John Sylvester; Dhiren Shah; Lawrence Karsh; Richard Hudes; David Beyer; Steven Kurtzman; Jeffrey Bogart; R Alex Hsi; Michael Kos; Rodney Ellis; Mark Logsdon; Shawn Zimberg; Kevin Forsythe; Hong Zhang; Edward Soffen; Patrick Francke; Constantine Mantz; Peter Rossi; Theodore DeWeese; Stephanie Daignault-Newton; Benjamin W Fischer-Valuck; Anupama Chundury; Hiram Gay; Walter Bosch; Jeff Michalski Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2016-12-23 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: David P Dearnaley; Gordana Jovic; Isabel Syndikus; Vincent Khoo; Richard A Cowan; John D Graham; Edwin G Aird; David Bottomley; Robert A Huddart; Chakiath C Jose; John H L Matthews; Jeremy L Millar; Claire Murphy; J Martin Russell; Christopher D Scrase; Mahesh K B Parmar; Matthew R Sydes Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2014-02-26 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Matthew Forsthoefel; Ryan Hankins; Elizabeth Ballew; Cara Frame; David DeBlois; Dalong Pang; Pranay Krishnan; Keith Unger; Keith Kowalczyk; John Lynch; Anatoly Dritschilo; Sean P Collins; Jonathan W Lischalk Journal: Int J Part Ther Date: 2022-04-06
Authors: Jonathan W Lischalk; Seth Blacksburg; Christopher Mendez; Michael Repka; Astrid Sanchez; Todd Carpenter; Matthew Witten; Jules E Garbus; Andrew Evans; Sean P Collins; Aaron Katz; Jonathan Haas Journal: Radiat Oncol Date: 2021-07-09 Impact factor: 3.481