Literature DB >> 16029785

Dose-volume analysis of predictors for chronic rectal toxicity after treatment of prostate cancer with adaptive image-guided radiotherapy.

Carlos Vargas1, Alvaro Martinez, Larry L Kestin, Di Yan, Inga Grills, Donald S Brabbins, David M Lockman, Jian Liang, Gary S Gustafson, Peter Y Chen, Frank A Vicini, John W Wong.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We analyzed our experience treating localized prostate cancer with image-guided off-line correction with adaptive high-dose radiotherapy (ART) in our Phase II dose escalation study to identify factors predictive of chronic rectal toxicity.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 1999-2002, 331 patients with clinical stage T1-T3N0M0 prostate cancer were prospectively treated in our Phase II 3D conformal dose escalation ART study to a median dose of 75.6 Gy (range, 63.0-79.2 Gy), minimum dose to confidence limited-planning target volume (cl-PTV) in 1.8 Gy fractions (median isocenter dose = 79.7 Gy). Seventy-four patients (22%) also received neoadjuvant/adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy. A patient-specific cl-PTV was constructed using 5 computed tomography scans and 4 sets of electronic portal images by applying an adaptive process to assure target accuracy and minimize PTV margin. For each case, the rectum (rectal solid) was contoured from the sacroiliac joints or rectosigmoid junction (whichever was higher) to the anal verge or ischial tuberosities (whichever was lower), with a median volume of 81.2 cc. The rectal wall was defined using the rectal solid with an individualized 3-mm wall thickness (median volume = 29.8 cc). Rectal wall dose-volume histogram was used to determine the prescribed dose. Toxicity was quantified using the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria 2.0. Multiple dose-volume endpoints were evaluated for their association with chronic rectal toxicity.
RESULTS: Median follow-up was 1.6 years. Thirty-four patients (crude rate = 10.3%) experienced Grade 2 chronic rectal toxicity at a median interval of 1.1 years. Nine patients (crude rate = 2.7%) experienced Grade > or =3 chronic rectal toxicity (1 was Grade 4) at a median interval of 1.2 years. The 3-year rates of Grade > or =2 and Grade > or =3 chronic rectal toxicity were 20% and 4%, respectively. Acute toxicity predicted for chronic: Acute Grade 2-3 rectal toxicity (p < 0.001) including any acute rectal Grade 2-3 tenesmus (p = 0.02) and pain (p = 0.008) were significant predictors of chronic Grade > or =2 rectal toxicity. Any acute rectal toxicity (p = 0.001), any acute tenesmus (p = 0.03), and any acute diarrhea (p < 0.001) were also found to be predictive for chronic toxicity, as continuous variables. Dose-volume histogram predicted for chronic toxicity: Rectal wall absolute and relative V50, V60, V66.6, V70, and V72 and rectal solid relative V60-V72 were significantly associated with chronic Grade > or =2 rectal toxicity both as categorical and continuous variables (t test, linear regression) and when divided into subgroups (chi-square table). The chronic rectal toxicity Grade > or =2 risk was 9%, 18%, and 25% for the rectal wall relative V70 <15%, 25%-40%, and >40% respectively. The volume of rectum or rectal wall radiated to > or =50 Gy was a strong predictor for chronic rectal toxicity. Nonpredictive factors: Rectal solid/wall absolute or relative volumes irradiated to < or =40 Gy, dose level, and use of androgen deprivation were not found predictive.
CONCLUSIONS: In our ART dose escalation study, rectal wall or rectum relative > or =V50 are closely predictive for chronic rectal toxicity. If rectal dose-volume histogram constraints are used to select the dose level, the risk of chronic rectal toxicity will reflect the risk of toxicity of the selected constraint rather than the dose selected as found in our study using an adaptive process. To select the prescribed dose, different dose-volume histogram constraints may be used including the rectal wall V70. Patients experiencing acute rectal toxicity are more likely to experience chronic toxicity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16029785     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.12.052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  50 in total

1.  Incidence of late rectal bleeding in high-dose conformal radiotherapy of prostate cancer using equivalent uniform dose-based and dose-volume-based normal tissue complication probability models.

Authors:  Matthias Söhn; Di Yan; Jian Liang; Elisa Meldolesi; Carlos Vargas; Markus Alber
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2007-01-26       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Comparison of different contouring definitions of the rectum as organ at risk (OAR) and dose-volume parameters predicting rectal inflammation in radiotherapy of prostate cancer: which definition to use?

Authors:  Mirko Nitsche; Werner Brannath; Matthias Brückner; Dirk Wagner; Alexander Kaltenborn; Nils Temme; Robert M Hermann
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-12-12       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Preliminary toxicity analysis of 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy versus intensity modulated radiation therapy on the high-dose arm of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 0126 prostate cancer trial.

Authors:  Jeff M Michalski; Yan Yan; Deborah Watkins-Bruner; Walter R Bosch; Kathryn Winter; James M Galvin; Jean-Paul Bahary; Gerard C Morton; Matthew B Parliament; Howard M Sandler
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Late rectal toxicity on RTOG 94-06: analysis using a mixture Lyman model.

Authors:  Susan L Tucker; Lei Dong; Walter R Bosch; Jeff Michalski; Kathryn Winter; Radhe Mohan; James A Purdy; Deborah Kuban; Andrew K Lee; M Rex Cheung; Howard D Thames; James D Cox
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-07-02       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Treatment outcomes with hypofractionated high-dose radiation therapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Gustavo Arruda Viani; Bruno Tiago Rossi; Elton Suguikawa; Gisele Zuliani; Eduardo Jose Stefano
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2016-02-12

Review 6.  Adaptive radiation therapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Michel Ghilezan; Di Yan; Alvaro Martinez
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 5.934

7.  Do intermediate radiation doses contribute to late rectal toxicity? An analysis of data from radiation therapy oncology group protocol 94-06.

Authors:  Susan L Tucker; Lei Dong; Jeff M Michalski; Walter R Bosch; Kathryn Winter; James D Cox; James A Purdy; Radhe Mohan
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Adaptive planning using megavoltage fan-beam CT for radiation therapy with testicular shielding.

Authors:  Poonam Yadav; Kevin Kozak; Ranjini Tolakanahalli; V Ramasubramanian; Bhudatt R Paliwal; James S Welsh; Yi Rong
Journal:  Med Dosim       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 1.482

Review 9.  Reducing rectal injury during external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Riccardo Valdagni; Tiziana Rancati
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 14.432

10.  Modeling of alpha/beta for late rectal toxicity from a randomized phase II study: conventional versus hypofractionated scheme for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Simona Marzi; Biancamaria Saracino; Maria G Petrongari; Stefano Arcangeli; Sara Gomellini; Giorgio Arcangeli; Marcello Benassi; Valeria Landoni
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-08-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.