| Literature DB >> 30250509 |
Lisanne de Vries1,2, Ruben Vanholme1,2, Rebecca Van Acker1,2, Barbara De Meester1,2, Lisa Sundin1,2, Wout Boerjan1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Lignocellulosic biomass, such as wood and straw, is an interesting feedstock for the production of fermentable sugars. However, mainly due to the presence of lignin, this type of biomass is recalcitrant to saccharification. In Arabidopsis, lignocellulosic biomass with a lower lignin content or with lignin with an increased fraction of guaiacyl (G) and 5-hydroxyguaiacyl (5H) units shows an increased saccharification efficiency. Here, we stacked these two traits and studied the effect on the saccharification efficiency and biomass yield, by combining either transaldolase (tra2), cinnamate 4-hydroxylase (c4h-3), or 4-coumarate:CoA ligase (4cl1-1) with caffeic acid O-methyltransferase (comt-1 or comt-4) mutants.Entities:
Keywords: 4-coumarate:CoA ligase (4cl); Arabidopsis thaliana; Caffeic acid O-methyltransferase (comt); Cinnamate 4-hydroxylase (c4h); Gene stacking; Lignin; Saccharification; Transaldolase (tra)
Year: 2018 PMID: 30250509 PMCID: PMC6146604 DOI: 10.1186/s13068-018-1257-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biotechnol Biofuels ISSN: 1754-6834 Impact factor: 6.040
Fig. 1Lignin biosynthesis. The red box shows the pentose phosphate pathway, the orange box shows the shikimate pathway and the synthesis of the aromatic amino acid phenylalanine, the green box shows the general phenylpropanoid pathway and the blue box shows the monolignol specific pathway. Dotted arrows indicate more than one (enzymatic) conversion. In blue are the mutant alleles studied, in green 5-hydroxyconiferyl alcohol, that upon incorporation in lignin, gives rise to 5-hydroxyguaiacyl units. 4CL 4-coumarate:CoA ligase, 6PGD 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase, ADT arogenate dehydratase, AT amino transferase, C3H P-coumarate 3-hydroxylase, C4H cinnamate 4-hydroxylase, CAD cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase, CCoAOMT caffeoyl-COA O-methyltransferase, CCR cinnamoyl-CoA reductase, CM chorismate mutase, COMT caffeic acid O-methyltransferase, CS chorismate synthase, CSE caffeoyl shikimate esterase, DHQD/SD 3-dehydroquinate dehydratase/shikimate dehydrogenase, DHS 3-deoxy-d-arabino-heptulosonate 7-phosphate synthase, DQS 3-dehydroquinate synthase, EPSPS 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase, F5H ferulate 5-hydroxylase, G6PD glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase, HCT hydroxycinnamoyl-COA shikimate/quinate hydroxycinnamoyl transferase, HPI hexose phosphate isomerase, PAL penylalanine ammonia-lysase, PDT prephenate dehydratase, RPE ribose-5-phosphate epimerase, RPI ribose-5-phosphate isomerase, SK shikimate kinase, SOL3 6-gluconolactonase, TKT transketolase, TRA transaldolase
Phenotypic traits
| Line | Height (cm) | Mass (mg) | % CWR |
|---|---|---|---|
| WT | 46.8 ± 5.3 | 43.1 ± 9.9 | 75.4 ± 1.7 |
| | 46.5 ± 4.7 | 37.5 ± 11.3 | 75.2 ± 1.1 |
| | 48.3 ± 4.6 | 44.4 ± 11.3 | 74.5 ± 2.1 |
| | 48.7 ± 3.8 | 42.6 ± 10.8 | 74.0 ± 2.2 |
| WT | 48.2 ± 4.9 | 53.5 ± 15.0 | 74.9 ± 1.8 |
| | 50.5 ± 3.3 | 55.8 ± 12.9 | 76.0 ± 2.5 |
| | 50.5 ± 5.6 | 54.9 ± 9.5 | 75.7 ± 2.3 |
| | 50.2 ± 4.1 | 54.8 ± 12.3 | 74.2 ± 1.4 |
| WT | 51.3 ± 4.0 | 43.7 ± 7.7 | 77.8 ± 1.2 |
| | 50.2 ± 3.8 | 43.6 ± 7.5 | 77.0 ± 1.7 |
| | 52.5 ± 3.6 | 43.9 ± 7.1 | 76.9 ± 1.4 |
| | 51.6 ± 3.0 | 43.9 ± 6.6 | 77.1 ± 1.4 |
Height and mass were determined on fully senesced primary inflorescence stems of the three double mutants, wild type (WT), and the corresponding parental lines. The data represent the average ± standard deviation of at least 24 replicates per line. The cell-wall residue (CWR) was determined gravimetrically after extraction and is expressed in % dry weight ± standard deviation (n = 10). No significant differences were observed at the 0.01 significance level (ANOVA, pairwise comparison with Holm correction)
WT wild type
Lignin amount and composition
| Line | AcBr | S/G | % H | % G | % S | % 5H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WT | 11.2 ± 0.9a | 0.63 ± 0.08a | 0.4 ± 0.1a | 60.9 ± 2.9a | 38.5 ± 2.9a | 0.24 ± 0.05a |
| | 10.0 ± 1.4ab* | 0.79 ± 0.11b | 0.6 ± 0.2a | 55.4 ± 3.3b | 43.7 ± 3.3a | 0.27 ± 0.05a |
| | 10.9 ± 0.7ab | 0.02 ± 0.01c | 0.5 ± 0.2a | 96.9 ± 1.4c | 1.5 ± 1.4b | 0.99 ± 0.37b |
| | 9.6 ± 1.0b | 0.01 ± 0.00c | 0.7 ± 0.2a | 96.8 ± 0.4c | 1.4 ± 0.5b | 0.99 ± 0.29b |
| WT | 11.3 ± 0.8a | 0.52 ± 0.03a | 0.7 ± 0.1a | 65.2 ± 1.2a | 33.9 ± 1.2a | 0.16 ± 0.02a |
| | 8.1 ± 0.8b | 1.05 ± 0.07b | 1.2 ± 0.4b.c | 48.2 ± 1.6b | 50.5 ± 1.9b | 0.18 ± 0.01b |
| | 11.6 ± 1.9a | 0.06 ± 0.01c | 1.0 ± 0.3a.b | 92.2 ± 1.0c | 5.6 ± 0.8c | 1.25 ± 0.14c |
| | 7.9 ± 0.3b | 0.13 ± 0.01d | 1.5 ± 0.2c | 85.4 ± 0.8d | 11.5 ± 0.8d | 1.54 ± 0.39c |
| WT | 11.8 ± 0.7a | 0.62 ± 0.18a | 1.2 ± 0.2a | 61.7 ± 6.9a | 36.9 ± 6.8a | 0.16 ± 0.04a |
| | 8.3 ± 1.4b | 0.90 ± 0.04b | 2.0 ± 0.3b, c | 51.7 ± 1.2b | 46.2 ± 1.2b | 0.16 ± 0.02a |
| | 10.2 ± 1.0c | 0.11 ± 0.02c | 1.6 ± 0.5a, c | 87.2 ± 2.3c | 9.8 ± 1.9c | 1.49 ± 0.55b |
| | 6.9 ± 0.5d | 0.18 ± 0.02d | 2.4 ± 0.6b | 82.0 ± 1.6d | 14.5 ± 1.4d | 1.08 ± 0.39b |
Lignin amount and composition of the three double mutants, wild type (WT), and the corresponding parental lines (n = 10) (± SD). The lignin amount was determined via the AcBr method and is expressed as % CWR. The lignin composition was determined via thioacidolysis. The relative amounts of the different lignin units were calculated based on the total thioacidolysis yield. The S/G ratio was calculated based on the absolute values for S and G (expressed in μmol mg−1 AcBr lignin). Significance groups are indicated with the same letter in superscript and different letters represent significant differences at the 0.01 significance level (ANOVA or Kruskal–Wallis, pairwise comparison with Holm correction). *p value 0.051 after pairwise comparison with Holm correction
WT wild type
Cellulose amount
| Plant | Cellulose (% CWR) |
|---|---|
| WT | 37.3 ± 0.9a |
| | 38.2 ± 0.6a |
| | 38.1 ± 1.3a |
| | 38.7 ± 0.9a |
| WT | 37.1 ± 0.6a |
| | 38.7 ± 1.1b |
| | 38.2 ± 0.9a, b |
| | 40.0 ± 0.6c |
| | |
| WT | 38.2 ± 0.6a |
| | 39.2 ± 1.0a |
| | 39.3 ± 1.0a |
| | 39.3 ± 0.7a |
The crystalline cellulose amount was determined with the Updegraff cellulose assay. Measured amounts were normalized to the CWR. Values denote average ± SD (n = 10). Significance groups are indicated with the same letter in superscript and different letters represent significant differences at the 0.01 significance level (ANOVA, pairwise comparison with Holm correction)
WT wild type
Fig. 2Cellulose-to-glucose conversions. Cellulose-to-glucose conversions of the tra2 comt-1, c4h-3 comt-4, and 4cl1-1 comt-4 double mutants, wild type, and the corresponding parental lines, without, with acid, and with alkaline pretreatment. The conversions were calculated based on the saccharification efficiency and cellulose content (both on CWR basis) and are expressed in % converted cellulose at the moment the plateau was reached. a Cellulose-to-glucose conversion for tra2 comt-1 and its respective control lines. b Cellulose-to-glucose conversion for c4h-3 comt-4 and its respective control lines. c Cellulose-to-glucose conversion for 4cl1-1 comt-4 and its respective control lines. The error bars represent standard deviations (n = 10). Significance is presented as significance groups, and values with the same letter do not differ significantly from each other at the 0.05 significance level (ANOVA, pairwise comparison Holm correction)