| Literature DB >> 26312068 |
Robert W Sykes1, Erica L Gjersing1, Kirk Foutz2, William H Rottmann2, Sean A Kuhn2, Cliff E Foster3, Angela Ziebell1, Geoffrey B Turner4, Stephen R Decker4, Maud A W Hinchee2, Mark F Davis1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Lignocellulosic materials provide an attractive replacement for food-based crops used to produce ethanol. Understanding the interactions within the cell wall is vital to overcome the highly recalcitrant nature of biomass. One factor imparting plant cell wall recalcitrance is lignin, which can be manipulated by making changes in the lignin biosynthetic pathway. In this study, eucalyptus down-regulated in expression of cinnamate 4-hydroxylase (C4H, EC 1.14.13.11) or p-coumaroyl quinate/shikimate 3'-hydroxylase (C3'H, EC 1.14.13.36) were evaluated for cell wall composition and reduced recalcitrance.Entities:
Keywords: Eucalyptus urophylla × E. grandis; Genetic modification; Lignin biosynthesis; Pretreatment; Recalcitrance
Year: 2015 PMID: 26312068 PMCID: PMC4550073 DOI: 10.1186/s13068-015-0316-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biotechnol Biofuels ISSN: 1754-6834 Impact factor: 6.040
Fig. 1Chemical structures of starting alcohols used in the formation of lignin
RT-PCR quantification of gene expression
| Sample | Relative expression of C4H (Eucgr.H01844) | Relative expression of C3H (Eucgr.A02190) |
|---|---|---|
| Control 014 | 0.95 | 0.85 |
| Control 018 | 0.98 | 1.08 |
| Control 023 | 1.06 | 1.03 |
| Control avg | 1.00 ± 0.06 | 0.99 ± 0.12 |
| C3′H 105 | 0.79 | 0.15 |
| C3′H 113 | 0.68 | 0.093 |
| C3′H 114 | 0.79 | 0.082 |
| C3′H avg | 0.75 ± 0.06* | 0.108 ± 0.036* |
| C4H 091 | 0.11 | 0.76 |
| C4H 092 | 0.092 | 1.22 |
| C4H 093 | 0.091 | 0.69 |
| C4H 098 | 0.087 | 0.62 |
| C4H avg | 0.095 ± 0.010* | 0.82 ± 0.27 |
* Indicates significant difference from the control average at the p value <0.05 level
Traditional wet chemical composition for eucalyptus plants with lignin pathway modifications
| Sample | % Ash | % Water extractives | % Ethanol extractives | % Lignin | % Glucose | % Xylose | % Galactose | % Arabinose | % Acetyl | % Mass closure |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control a | 0.5 | 4.4 | 0.9 | 29.3 | 39.4 | 13.0 | 1.7 | 0.5 | 3.9 | 93.5 |
| Control b | 0.7 | 3.9 | 0.9 | 30.0 | 40.9 | 13.1 | 1.5 | 0.6 | 3.9 | 95.3 |
| Control avg | 0.6 | 4.2 | 0.9 | 29.6 | 40.2 | 13.0 | 1.6 | 0.5 | 3.9 | 94.4 |
| C3′H 105 | 0.7 | 7.3 | 1.2 | 22.3 | 38.8 | 16.0 | 1.4 | 0.0 | 4.7 | 92.4 |
| C3′H 106a | 0.5 | 5.7 | 1.0 | 21.3 | 41.9 | 16.3 | 1.8 | 0.6 | 4.9 | 94.0 |
| C3′H 106b | 0.5 | 6.7 | 1.2 | 21.4 | 41.0 | 16.1 | 1.3 | 0.6 | 4.9 | 93.7 |
| C3′H 113a | 0.5 | 7.0 | 1.1 | 21.5 | 39.5 | 17.1 | 1.3 | 0.3 | 5.1 | 93.3 |
| C3′H 113b | 0.5 | 6.9 | 1.3 | 22.1 | 38.5 | 17.3 | 1.3 | 0.7 | 4.9 | 93.5 |
| C3′H 114 | 0.9 | 4.6 | 1.7 | 21.6 | 38.5 | 18.4 | 1.3 | 3.1 | 4.9 | 95.1 |
| C3′H avg | 0.6 | 6.4* | 1.3 | 21.7* | 39.7 | 16.9* | 1.4 | 0.9 | 4.9* | 93.7 |
| C4H 73a | 0.9 | 3.7 | 0.8 | 17.8 | 46.3 | 16.6 | 2.5 | 0.3 | 4.7 | 93.6 |
| C4H 73b | 0.9 | 5.8 | 0.9 | 18.9 | 42.3 | 17.3 | 1.7 | 0.3 | 4.9 | 92.8 |
| C4H 91 | 0.8 | 3.8 | 0.9 | 20.9 | 43.5 | 16.6 | 1.8 | 2.5 | 4.2 | 95.0 |
| C4H 92 | 0.8 | 3.8 | 1.0 | 19.5 | 44.0 | 17.7 | 1.4 | 2.7 | 4.5 | 95.4 |
| C4H 93 | 0.7 | 4.7 | 0.8 | 18.5 | 42.7 | 18.5 | 1.9 | 2.6 | 4.7 | 95.2 |
| C4H 96 | 0.7 | 5.8 | 0.8 | 17.5 | 41.3 | 19.0 | 1.4 | 0.1 | 5.2 | 91.9 |
| C4H 98 | 0.8 | 3.9 | 1.0 | 20.1 | 43.5 | 17.5 | 1.7 | 2.2 | 4.3 | 95.0 |
| C4H 99a | 0.8 | 4.4 | 1.3 | 18.5 | 41.6 | 18.3 | 1.6 | 0.4 | 4.9 | 91.9 |
| C4H 99b | 0.9 | 5.3 | 1.0 | 18.4 | 42.0 | 17.6 | 1.6 | 0.3 | 4.7 | 91.9 |
| C4H avg | 0.8* | 4.6 | 0.9 | 18.9* | 43.0 | 17.7* | 1.7 | 1.3 | 4.7* | 93.6 |
* Indicates significant difference from the control average at the p value <0.05 level
Thioacidolysis results compared with lignin and S/G estimates using pyrolysis molecular beam mass spectrometry (PyMBMS)
| Sample | Thioacidolysis | PyMBMS | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % S | % G | % H | S/G Ratio | S/G Ratio | Lignin | |
| Control a | 66.0 | 32.6 | 1.5 | 2.0 | 2.1 | 30.0 |
| Control b | 65.8 | 33.7 | 0.5 | 1.9 | 2.1 | 30.9 |
| Control avg | 65.9 | 33.2 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 2.1 | 30.4 |
| C3′H 105 | 51.7 | 34.0 | 14.2 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 22.9 |
| C3′H 106a | 48.3 | 34.2 | 17.6 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 20.5 |
| C3′H 106b | 46.9 | 34.2 | 19.0 | 1.4 | 1.1 | 21.2 |
| C3′H 113a | 49.1 | 32.4 | 18.5 | 1.5 | 1.2 | 21.5 |
| C3′H 113b | 48.8 | 31.2 | 19.9 | 1.6 | 1.2 | 20.6 |
| C3′H 114 | 46.1 | 33.5 | 20.4 | 1.4 | 1.1 | 19.6 |
| C3′H avg | 48.5* | 33.2 | 18.3* | 1.5* | 1.2* | 21.0* |
| C4H 73a | 58.6 | 38.2 | 3.1 | 1.5 | 1.2 | 21.9 |
| C4H 73b | 59.0 | 40.2 | 0.9 | 1.5 | 1.2 | 21.9 |
| C4H 91 | 57.7 | 41.4 | 0.9 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 23.1 |
| C4H 92 | 58.2 | 41.2 | 0.7 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 22.5 |
| C4H 93 | 59.2 | 39.7 | 1.1 | 1.5 | 1.2 | 21.1 |
| C4H 96 | 58.4 | 40.8 | 0.8 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 21.8 |
| C4H 98 | 61.5 | 37.6 | 0.9 | 1.6 | 1.3 | 22.9 |
| C4H 99a | 60.4 | 38.5 | 1.2 | 1.6 | 1.1 | 19.0 |
| C4H 99b | 58.0 | 40.9 | 1.0 | 1.4 | 1.1 | 21.2 |
| C4H avg | 59.0* | 39.8* | 1.2 | 1.5* | 1.2* | 21.7* |
* Indicates significant difference from the control average at the p value <0.05 level
Percentage of sugar released by enzymatic saccharification
| Sample | No pretreatment | Hydrothermal pretreatment | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % Glucose | % Xylose | % Total | % Glucose | % Xylose | % Total | |
| Control a | 3 | 1 | 3 | 72 | 97 | 78 |
| Control b | 1 | 2 | 1 | 73 | 108 | 82 |
| Control avg | 2 | 1 | 2 | 73 | 102 | 80 |
| C3′H 105 | 11 | 9 | 11 | 89 | 111 | 95 |
| C3′H 106a | 17 | 11 | 15 | 86 | 106 | 92 |
| C3′H 106b | 16 | 13 | 15 | 86 | 110 | 92 |
| C3′H 113a | 16 | 11 | 14 | 87 | 109 | 93 |
| C3′H 113b | 16 | 13 | 15 | 90 | 110 | 96 |
| C3′H 114 | 29 | 25 | 28 | 82 | 97 | 87 |
| C3′H avg | 18* | 14* | 16* | 87* | 107 | 93* |
| C4H 73a | 30 | 21 | 28 | 82 | 103 | 88 |
| C4H 73b | 18 | 14 | 17 | 94 | 113 | 99 |
| C4H 91 | 12 | 9 | 11 | 88 | 107 | 93 |
| C4H 92 | 15 | 11 | 14 | 89 | 103 | 93 |
| C4H 93 | 26 | 17 | 23 | 94 | 105 | 97 |
| C4H 96 | 23 | 16 | 21 | 96 | 103 | 98 |
| C4H 98 | 22 | 12 | 19 | 84 | 96 | 87 |
| C4H 99a | 30 | 22 | 28 | 98 | 111 | 102 |
| C4H 99b | 28 | 23 | 26 | 93 | 109 | 98 |
| C4H avg | 23* | 16* | 21* | 91* | 106 | 95* |
* Indicates significant difference from the control average at the p value <0.05 level
Fig. 2Glucose release versus Klason lignin content for samples that were not subjected to pretreatment (gray diamonds) and pretreated samples (black squares)