Literature DB >> 30247274

Acute Physiological Responses to an Intensity-And Time-Under-Tension-Equated Single- vs. Multiple-Set Resistance Training Bout in Trained Men.

Harry P Cintineo1, Daniel J Freidenreich2, Caitlin M Blaine3, Thomas D Cardaci1, Joseph K Pellegrino1, Shawn M Arent1,4.   

Abstract

Cintineo, HP, Freidenreich, DJ, Blaine, CM, Cardaci, TD, Pellegrino, JK, and Arent, SM. Acute physiological responses to an intensity-and time under-under-tension-equated single- vs. multiple-set resistance training bout in trained men. J Strength Cond Res 32(12): 3310-3318, 2018-Regardless of the setting, proper manipulation of resistance training program design variables is pivotal in eliciting the desired physiological adaptations. Furthermore, how these variables, especially volume and intensity, work together to affect training outcomes is a major topic of investigation. The purpose of this study was to compare the acute biochemical, physiological, and hormonal responses of a single-set accentuated eccentric high-intensity training (HIT) protocol to a traditional 3-set protocol to better understand the acute effects of volume. Resistance-trained male college students (N = 19; age = 21.11 ± 2.5 years; height = 174.33 ± 6.83 cm; body mass = 76.72 ± 10.24 kg; %BF = 15.53 ± 6.35%) participated in this study and were randomly assigned to either the 1-set HIT protocol (HIT) or the 3-set traditional (3ST) protocol. Heart rate (HR), blood lactate, salivary testosterone, and salivary cortisol levels were measured before, during, and at multiple time points after the exercise bout. Results showed no differences in average HR or testosterone at any time point between the 2 groups. However, the 3ST group exhibited higher values of peak HR, blood lactate during exercise, and cortisol during and 30 minutes after exercise than the HIT group. This indicated that the 3ST protocol induced greater metabolic stress and disrupted the homeostatic balance to a greater magnitude than the HIT protocol despite similar time under tension. These results show that even when training to momentary muscular failure, volume seems to be a key driver of the training stimulus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30247274     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002872

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  6 in total

1.  Exercise Variability Did Not Affect Muscle Thickness and Peak Force for Elbow Flexors After a Resistance Training Session in Recreationally-Trained Subjects.

Authors:  Ethan Smith; Andres Sepulveda; Vincent G F Martinez; Ashley Samaniego; Priscyla N Marchetti; Paulo H Marchetti
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2021-11-01

2.  Inter-set rest configuration effect on acute physiological and performance-related responses to a resistance training session in terrestrial vs simulated hypoxia.

Authors:  Cristina Benavente; Belén Feriche; Guillermo Olcina; Brad J Schoenfeld; Alba Camacho-Cardenosa; Filipa Almeida; Ismael Martínez-Guardado; Rafael Timon; Paulino Padial
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 3.061

3.  Individualized Whole-Body Vibration: Neuromuscular, Biochemical, Muscle Damage and Inflammatory Acute Responses.

Authors:  Riccardo Di Giminiani; Nadia Rucci; Lorenzo Capuano; Marco Ponzetti; Federica Aielli; Jozsef Tihanyi
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 2.658

4.  High-Load Resistance Exercise Augments Androgen Receptor-DNA Binding and Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling without Increases in Serum/Muscle Androgens or Androgen Receptor Content.

Authors:  Thomas D Cardaci; Steven B Machek; Dylan T Wilburn; Jeffery L Heileson; Darryn S Willoughby
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 5.717

5.  Postural Control and Stress Exposure in Young Men: Changes in Cortisol Awakening Response and Blood Lactate.

Authors:  Marinella Coco; Andrea Buscemi; Emanuele Pennisi; Paolo Cavallari; Giacomo Papotto; Giulio Maria Federico Papotto; Vincenzo Perciavalle; Donatella Di Corrado; Valentina Perciavalle
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-10-02       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Effects of Resistance Training in Hypobaric vs. Normobaric Hypoxia on Circulating Ions and Hormones.

Authors:  Rafael Timon; Guillermo Olcina; Paulino Padial; Juan Bonitch-Góngora; Ismael Martínez-Guardado; Cristina Benavente; Blanca de la Fuente; Belen Feriche
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 3.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.