Literature DB >> 35096238

Exercise Variability Did Not Affect Muscle Thickness and Peak Force for Elbow Flexors After a Resistance Training Session in Recreationally-Trained Subjects.

Ethan Smith1, Andres Sepulveda1, Vincent G F Martinez1, Ashley Samaniego1, Priscyla N Marchetti1, Paulo H Marchetti1.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to measure the acute effects of exercise variability on muscle thickness and physical performance after two resistance training (RT) protocols using the same or different exercises in recreationally-trained subjects. Fifteen resistance-trained men (23.1 ± 2.6 years, 83.4 ± 16.6 kg, 173.5 ± 8.3cm) performed one of two RT protocols: SINGLE: six sets of 10RM/two-minutes rest of the unilateral biceps curl exercise using cables or MIX: six sets of 10RM/two-minutes rest for the unilateral biceps curl exercises (cable: three sets and dumbbells: three sets, randomly). Muscle thickness (MT) and peak force (PF) were measured ten-minutes before (control), pre-RT session, and post-RT (immediately after and 15-minutes after). All acute RT variables were measured during both RT protocols: the maximal number of repetitions (MNR), the total number of repetitions (TNR), time under tension (TUT), and rating of perceived exertion (RPE). Two-way ANOVA (2 x 4) was used to test differences between RT protocol (SINGLE and MIX) and time (control, pre-test, post0, and post15) for MT and PF. Two-way ANOVAs (2 x 6) were used to test differences between RT protocol (SINGLE and MIX) and sets for MNR, RPEset, and TUT. For PF and MT, there were significant differences in time for both RT protocols (p < 0.05), however, there were not statistical differences between RT protocols. For MNR, RPEset, and TUT, there were significant differences in time (p < 0.05), however, there were not statistical differences between RT protocols. In conclusion, both RT protocols induced a similar increase in MT for elbow flexors and a reduction in peak force.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Exercise selection; muscle pump; performance; strength

Year:  2021        PMID: 35096238      PMCID: PMC8758154     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci        ISSN: 1939-795X


  16 in total

1.  Sample size estimation: how many individuals should be studied?

Authors:  John Eng
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 2.  Training Monitoring for Resistance Exercise: Theory and Applications.

Authors:  Brendan R Scott; Grant M Duthie; Heidi R Thornton; Ben J Dascombe
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 3.  Potential mechanisms for a role of metabolic stress in hypertrophic adaptations to resistance training.

Authors:  Brad J Schoenfeld
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Changes in exercises are more effective than in loading schemes to improve muscle strength.

Authors:  Rodrigo M Fonseca; Hamilton Roschel; Valmor Tricoli; Eduardo O de Souza; Jacob M Wilson; Gilberto C Laurentino; André Y Aihara; Alberto R de Souza Leão; Carlos Ugrinowitsch
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 5.  Morphological and functional relationships with ultrasound measured muscle thickness of the upper extremity and trunk.

Authors:  Takashi Abe; Jeremy P Loenneke; Robert S Thiebaud; Mark Loftin
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2014-10-07

Review 6.  Rating of Perceived Effort: Methodological Concerns and Future Directions.

Authors:  Israel Halperin; Aviv Emanuel
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 11.136

7.  American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal, and neuromotor fitness in apparently healthy adults: guidance for prescribing exercise.

Authors:  Carol Ewing Garber; Bryan Blissmer; Michael R Deschenes; Barry A Franklin; Michael J Lamonte; I-Min Lee; David C Nieman; David P Swain
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 5.411

8.  Quantitation of resistance training using the session rating of perceived exertion method.

Authors:  Travis W Sweet; Carl Foster; Michael R McGuigan; Glenn Brice
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.775

9.  Relationship Between Muscle Swelling and Hypertrophy Induced by Resistance Training.

Authors:  Tetsuya Hirono; Tome Ikezoe; Masashi Taniguchi; Hiroki Tanaka; Junya Saeki; Masahide Yagi; Jun Umehara; Noriaki Ichihashi
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 3.775

10.  The effects of exercise variation in muscle thickness, maximal strength and motivation in resistance trained men.

Authors:  Eneko Baz-Valle; Brad J Schoenfeld; Jon Torres-Unda; Jordan Santos-Concejero; Carlos Balsalobre-Fernández
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-27       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.