Literature DB >> 30246892

Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) with an extended physical model for MRI frequency contrast in the brain: a proof-of-concept of quantitative susceptibility and residual (QUASAR) mapping.

Ferdinand Schweser1,2, Robert Zivadinov1,2.   

Abstract

Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) aims to calculate the tissue's magnetic susceptibility distribution from its perturbing effect on the MRI static main magnetic field. The method is increasingly being applied to study iron and myelin in clinical and preclinical settings. However, recent experimental and theoretical findings have challenged the fundamental theoretical assumptions that form the basis of current numerical implementations of QSM algorithms. The present work introduces a new class of susceptibility mapping algorithms, termed quantitative susceptibility and residual mapping (QUASAR), which takes into account frequency contributions not related to the spatial variation of bulk magnetic susceptibility in the Lorentz sphere model. We present a simple proof-of-concept QUASAR algorithm that, unlike most of the QSM algorithms currently used widely, results in an improved anatomical accuracy of the susceptibility distribution without any a priori assumptions about the susceptibility distribution during the field-to-source inversion. The algorithm was evaluated both in silico and in vivo in the preclinical setting. Our preliminary application of QUASAR in rodents provides the first in vivo evidence that the susceptibility-field model traditionally used in the QSM field cannot fully explain the frequency contrast in brain tissues. Only when an additional local frequency contribution is added to the physical model can the frequency contrast in the brain be related properly to the underlying anatomy.
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  GLTA; QSM; exchange effects; phase contrast; rodents; susceptibility mapping

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30246892      PMCID: PMC6296773          DOI: 10.1002/nbm.3999

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  NMR Biomed        ISSN: 0952-3480            Impact factor:   4.044


  68 in total

1.  Fast and robust three-dimensional best path phase unwrapping algorithm.

Authors:  Hussein S Abdul-Rahman; Munther A Gdeisat; David R Burton; Michael J Lalor; Francis Lilley; Christopher J Moore
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  2007-09-10       Impact factor: 1.980

2.  Packing at the protein-water interface.

Authors:  M Gerstein; C Chothia
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-09-17       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  A modulated closed form solution for quantitative susceptibility mapping--a thorough evaluation and comparison to iterative methods based on edge prior knowledge.

Authors:  Diana Khabipova; Yves Wiaux; Rolf Gruetter; José P Marques
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-11-22       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 4.  Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping: Concepts and Applications.

Authors:  J R Reichenbach; F Schweser; B Serres; A Deistung
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 3.649

Review 5.  Quantitative susceptibility mapping: current status and future directions.

Authors:  E Mark Haacke; Saifeng Liu; Sagar Buch; Weili Zheng; Dongmei Wu; Yongquan Ye
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2014-10-25       Impact factor: 2.546

Review 6.  Susceptibility-weighted imaging and quantitative susceptibility mapping in the brain.

Authors:  Chunlei Liu; Wei Li; Karen A Tong; Kristen W Yeom; Samuel Kuzminski
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Exploring the origins of echo-time-dependent quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) measurements in healthy tissue and cerebral microbleeds.

Authors:  Matthew J Cronin; Nian Wang; Kyle S Decker; Hongjiang Wei; Wen-Zhen Zhu; Chunlei Liu
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Development of a robust method for generating 7.0 T multichannel phase images of the brain with application to normal volunteers and patients with neurological diseases.

Authors:  Kathryn E Hammond; Janine M Lupo; Duan Xu; Meredith Metcalf; Douglas A C Kelley; Daniel Pelletier; Susan M Chang; Pratik Mukherjee; Daniel B Vigneron; Sarah J Nelson
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Quantitative susceptibility mapping: Report from the 2016 reconstruction challenge.

Authors:  Christian Langkammer; Ferdinand Schweser; Karin Shmueli; Christian Kames; Xu Li; Li Guo; Carlos Milovic; Jinsuh Kim; Hongjiang Wei; Kristian Bredies; Sagar Buch; Yihao Guo; Zhe Liu; Jakob Meineke; Alexander Rauscher; José P Marques; Berkin Bilgic
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  Vascular and Tissue Changes of Magnetic Susceptibility in the Mouse Brain After Transient Cerebral Ischemia.

Authors:  Markus Vaas; Andreas Deistung; Jürgen R Reichenbach; Annika Keller; Anja Kipar; Jan Klohs
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2017-11-25       Impact factor: 6.829

View more
  3 in total

1.  Visualization of thalamic calcium influx with quantitative susceptibility mapping as a potential imaging biomarker for repeated mild traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Ferdinand Schweser; Jenni Kyyriäinen; Marilena Preda; Asla Pitkänen; Kathryn Toffolo; Austin Poulsen; Kaitlynn Donahue; Benett Levy; David Poulsen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  QSM reconstruction challenge 2.0: A realistic in silico head phantom for MRI data simulation and evaluation of susceptibility mapping procedures.

Authors:  José P Marques; Jakob Meineke; Carlos Milovic; Berkin Bilgic; Kwok-Shing Chan; Renaud Hedouin; Wietske van der Zwaag; Christian Langkammer; Ferdinand Schweser
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Imaging white matter microstructure with gradient-echo phase imaging: Is ex vivo imaging with formalin-fixed tissue a good approximation of the in vivo brain?

Authors:  Kwok-Shing Chan; Renaud Hédouin; Jeroen Mollink; Jenni Schulz; Anne-Marie van Cappellen van Walsum; José P Marques
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 3.737

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.