Literature DB >> 28126551

Exploring the origins of echo-time-dependent quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) measurements in healthy tissue and cerebral microbleeds.

Matthew J Cronin1, Nian Wang2, Kyle S Decker2, Hongjiang Wei1, Wen-Zhen Zhu3, Chunlei Liu4.   

Abstract

Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) is increasingly used to measure variation in tissue composition both in the brain and in other areas of the body in a range of disease pathologies. Although QSM measurements were originally believed to be independent of the echo time (TE) used in the gradient-recalled echo (GRE) acquisition from which they are derived; recent literature (Sood et al., 2016) has shown that these measurements can be highly TE-dependent in a number of brain regions. In this work we systematically investigate possible causes of this effect through analysis of apparent frequency and QSM measurements derived from data acquired at multiple TEs in vivo in healthy brain regions and in cerebral microbleeds (CMBs); QSM data acquired in a gadolinium-doped phantom; and in QSM data derived from idealized simulated phase data. Apparent frequency measurements in the optic radiations (OR) and central corpus callosum (CC) were compared to those predicted by a 3-pool white matter model, however the model failed to fully explain contrasting frequency profiles measured in the OR and CC. Our results show that TE-dependent QSM measurements can be caused by a failure of phase unwrapping algorithms in and around strong susceptibility sources such as CMBs; however, in healthy brain regions this behavior appears to result from intrinsic non-linear phase evolution in the MR signal. From these results we conclude that care must be taken when deriving frequency and QSM measurements in strong susceptibility sources due to the inherent limitations in phase unwrapping; and that while signal compartmentalization due to tissue microstructure and content is a plausible cause of TE-dependent frequency and QSM measurements in healthy brain regions, better sampling of the MR signal and more complex models of tissue are needed to fully exploit this relationship.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cerebral microbleeds; Echo-time-dependent QSM; Hollow cylinder model; MRI signal compartmentalization; Quantitative susceptibility mapping; Tissue microstructure

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28126551      PMCID: PMC5368016          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.01.053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  73 in total

1.  Proton relaxation studies of water compartmentalization in a model neurological system.

Authors:  R S Menon; M S Rusinko; P S Allen
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Fiber composition of the human corpus callosum.

Authors:  F Aboitiz; A B Scheibel; R S Fisher; E Zaidel
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1992-12-11       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 3.  Imaging iron stores in the brain using magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  E Mark Haacke; Norman Y C Cheng; Michael J House; Qiang Liu; Jaladhar Neelavalli; Robert J Ogg; Asadullah Khan; Muhammad Ayaz; Wolff Kirsch; Andre Obenaus
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.546

4.  Whole brain susceptibility mapping using compressed sensing.

Authors:  Bing Wu; Wei Li; Arnaud Guidon; Chunlei Liu
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Detection of cerebral microbleeds with quantitative susceptibility mapping in the ArcAbeta mouse model of cerebral amyloidosis.

Authors:  Jan Klohs; Andreas Deistung; Ferdinand Schweser; Joanes Grandjean; Marco Dominietto; Conny Waschkies; Roger M Nitsch; Irene Knuesel; Jürgen R Reichenbach; Markus Rudin
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 6.200

6.  Biophysical mechanisms of MRI signal frequency contrast in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Dmitriy A Yablonskiy; Jie Luo; Alexander L Sukstanskii; Aditi Iyer; Anne H Cross
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-08-13       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  On the role of neuronal magnetic susceptibility and structure symmetry on gradient echo MR signal formation.

Authors:  Alexander L Sukstanskii; Dmitriy A Yablonskiy
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  A comparative neuroanatomical study of the red nucleus of the cat, macaque and human.

Authors:  Satoru Onodera; T Philip Hicks
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-08-13       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Detecting microstructural properties of white matter based on compartmentalization of magnetic susceptibility.

Authors:  Way Cherng Chen; Sean Foxley; Karla L Miller
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-12-23       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  A comparison of phase imaging and quantitative susceptibility mapping in the imaging of multiple sclerosis lesions at ultrahigh field.

Authors:  Matthew John Cronin; Samuel Wharton; Ali Al-Radaideh; Cris Constantinescu; Nikos Evangelou; Richard Bowtell; Penny Anne Gowland
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 2.310

View more
  18 in total

1.  Simultaneous quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) and R2* for high iron concentration quantification with 3D ultrashort echo time sequences: An echo dependence study.

Authors:  Xing Lu; Yajun Ma; Eric Y Chang; Qun He; Adam Searleman; Annette von Drygalski; Jiang Du
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Neonate and infant brain development from birth to 2 years assessed using MRI-based quantitative susceptibility mapping.

Authors:  Yuyao Zhang; Jingjing Shi; Hongjiang Wei; Victor Han; Wen-Zhen Zhu; Chunlei Liu
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Serial assessment of iron in the motor cortex in limb-onset amyotrophic lateral sclerosis using quantitative susceptibility mapping.

Authors:  Anjan Bhattarai; Zhaolin Chen; Phillip G D Ward; Paul Talman; Susan Mathers; Thanh G Phan; Caron Chapman; James Howe; Sarah Lee; Yennie Lie; Gary F Egan; Phyllis Chua
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2020-07

4.  Phase-based masking for quantitative susceptibility mapping of the human brain at 9.4T.

Authors:  Gisela E Hagberg; Korbinian Eckstein; Elisa Tuzzi; Jiazheng Zhou; Simon Robinson; Klaus Scheffler
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2022-06-26       Impact factor: 3.737

5.  MRI gradient-echo phase contrast of the brain at ultra-short TE with off-resonance saturation.

Authors:  Hongjiang Wei; Peng Cao; Antje Bischof; Roland G Henry; Peder E Z Larson; Chunlei Liu
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) with an extended physical model for MRI frequency contrast in the brain: a proof-of-concept of quantitative susceptibility and residual (QUASAR) mapping.

Authors:  Ferdinand Schweser; Robert Zivadinov
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 4.044

7.  Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping: MRI at 7T versus 3T.

Authors:  Pascal Spincemaille; Julie Anderson; Gaohong Wu; Baolian Yang; Maggie Fung; Ke Li; Shaojun Li; Ilhami Kovanlikaya; Ajay Gupta; Douglas Kelley; Nissim Benhamo; Yi Wang
Journal:  J Neuroimaging       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 2.486

8.  Asymmetric susceptibility tensor imaging.

Authors:  Steven Cao; Hongjiang Wei; Jingjia Chen; Chunlei Liu
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Single-step calculation of susceptibility through multiple orientation sampling.

Authors:  Lin Chen; Shuhui Cai; Peter C M van Zijl; Xu Li
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 4.478

10.  Quantifying MRI frequency shifts due to structures with anisotropic magnetic susceptibility using pyrolytic graphite sheet.

Authors:  Matthew J Cronin; Richard Bowtell
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.