| Literature DB >> 30245673 |
Nathaniel W Fortney1, Shaomei He1,2, Brandon J Converse1, Eric S Boyd3, Eric E Roden1.
Abstract
Iron (Fe) redox-based metabolisms likely supported life on early Earth and may support life on other Fe-rich rocky planets such as Mars. Modern systems that support active Fe redox cycling such as Chocolate Pots (CP) hot springs provide insight into how life could have functioned in such environments. Previous research demonstrated that Fe- and Si-rich and slightly acidic to circumneutral-pH springs at CP host active dissimilatory Fe(III) reducing microorganisms. However, the abundance and distribution of Fe(III)-reducing communities at CP is not well-understood, especially as they exist in situ. In addition, the potential for direct Fe(II) oxidation by lithotrophs in CP springs is understudied, in particular when compared to indirect oxidation promoted by oxygen producing Cyanobacteria. Here, a culture-independent approach, including 16S rRNA gene amplicon and shotgun metagenomic sequencing, was used to determine the distribution of putative Fe cycling microorganisms in vent fluids and sediment cores collected along the outflow channel of CP. Metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) of organisms native to sediment and planktonic microbial communities were screened for extracellular electron transfer (EET) systems putatively involved in Fe redox cycling and for CO2 fixation pathways. Abundant MAGs containing putative EET systems were identified as part of the sediment community at locations where Fe(III) reduction activity has previously been documented. MAGs encoding both putative EET systems and CO2 fixation pathways, inferred to be FeOB, were also present, but were less abundant components of the communities. These results suggest that the majority of the Fe(III) oxides that support in situ Fe(III) reduction are derived from abiotic oxidation. This study provides new insights into the interplay between Fe redox cycling and CO2 fixation in sustaining chemotrophic communities in CP with attendant implications for other neutral-pH hot springs.Entities:
Keywords: chocolate pots; extracellular electron transfer; iron(II)-oxidizing bacteria; iron(III)-reducing bacteria; metagenomics; yellowstone
Year: 2018 PMID: 30245673 PMCID: PMC6137239 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02075
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Figure 1(A) View from the top of the main hot spring mound looking toward the Gibbon River. Flow path is marked with neon-green flags. Approximate area of the vent pool is marked with a white dotted line. (B) Top-down view of the pool at the main hot spring vent pool at Chocolate Pots. The site for the sediment core collection in 2013 is indicated with an S. The vent source (partially obscured by grasses) where spring water was collected in 2015 is indicated with a W.
Microbial community composition of Chocolate Pots core samples.
| Combined core libraries ( | Crenarchaeota (p) | 9.0 | Anaerobic methanogenic archaeon ET1-8 | 87 | Methanogenic cellulolytic archaeon | Chin et al., | N/A | ||
| Chlorobi (p) | 5.0 | 83 | Facultative anaerobic heterotroph | Iino et al., | 39 | 99.3 | |||
| Chlorobi (p) | 4.7 | 84 | Facultative anaerobic heterotroph | Iino et al., | N/A | ||||
| 4.7 | “ | 83 | Lithoautotrophic acetogen | Nunoura et al., | N/A | ||||
| 3.8 | Uncultured bacterium clone Fl-1F_E11 | 92 | Uncharacterized | Yergeau et al., | N/A | ||||
| GAL15 (p) | 3.6 | 86 | Fe(III) reducer | Zavarzina et al., | N/A | ||||
| Acidobacteria (p) | 3.5 | 87 | Uncharacterized thermophile | Sayeh et al., unpublished data | N/A | ||||
| Crenarchaeota (p) | 3.1 | Anaerobic methanogenic archaeon ET1-8 | 91 | Methanogenic cellulolytic archaeon | Chin et al., | N/A | |||
| 2.5 | Chloroflexi bacterium SCGC AAA240-O05 | 88 | Uncharacterized | Swan et al., | N/A | ||||
| 2.2 | “ | 97 | Ammonia oxidizer | Sauder et al., unpublished data | N/A | ||||
| 2.1 | 93 | Ammonia oxidizer | Stieglmeier et al., | N/A | |||||
| 2.1 | 87 | Thermophilic sulfate oxidizer | Beeder et al., | N/A | |||||
| NC10 (p) | 2.1 | “ | 89 | Methane oxidizer, nitrate reducer | Ettwig et al., | N/A | |||
| 1.9 | “ | 93 | Methane oxidizer, nitrate reducer | Ettwig et al., | N/A | ||||
| Chloroflexi (p) | 1.7 | Chloroflexi bacterium SCGC AAA240-C09 | 88 | Uncharacterized | Swan et al., | N/A | |||
| 1.7 | “ | 85 | Chemolithotroph | Nunoura et al., | N/A | ||||
| 1.4 | 98 | Lithoautotrophic Fe(II) oxidizer | Weiss et al., | N/A | |||||
| SBR1093 (p) | 1.4 | Bacterium Kaz2 | 90 | Uncharacterized | Sueoka et al., unpublished data | N/A | |||
| NC10 (p) | 1.3 | “ | 88 | Denitrifying methanotroph | He and Hu, unpublished data | N/A | |||
| 1.2 | 92 | Methanogen | Huynh et al., | 1 | 99.3 | ||||
| 1.0 | “ | 97 | Lithoautotrophic acetogen | Nunoura et al., | N/A | ||||
| Acidobacteria (p) | 1.0 | Bacterium Ellin7505 | 85 | Uncharacterized | Davis et al., | N/A | |||
| 61.2 | |||||||||
| Core 1 surface | Crenarchaeota (p) | 8.5 | Anaerobic methanogenic archaeon ET1-8 | 87 | Methanogenic cellulolytic archaeon | Chin et al., | N/A | ||
| 8.1 | 90 | Fe(III), sulfate reduction | Henry et al., | N/A | |||||
| 7.3 | 87 | Uncharacterized thermophile | Cambon-Bonavita et al., unpublished data | N/A | |||||
| Armatimonadetes (p) | 6.0 | 88 | Uncharacterized thermophile | Lucas et al., unpublished data | N/A | ||||
| 5.3 | Chloroflexi bacterium SCGC AAA240-O05 | 88 | Uncharacterized | Swan et al., | N/A | ||||
| Crenarchaeota (p) | 3.6 | Anaerobic methanogenic archaeon ET1-8 | 87 | Methanogenic cellulose degrader | Chin et al., | N/A | |||
| Chlorobi (p) | 3.0 | 83 | Facultative anaerobic heterotroph | Iino et al., | 39 | 99.3 | |||
| 2.8 | Armatimonadetes bacterium JGI 0000077-K19 | 97 | Uncharacterized | Nobu et al., | N/A | ||||
| 2.4 | “Ca. A. autotrophicum” | 97 | Lithoautotrophic acetogen | Nunoura et al., | N/A | ||||
| Chlorobi (p) | 2.4 | 87 | Thermophilic aerobic heterotroph | Marteinsson et al., | N/A | ||||
| 2.4 | 92 | Reductive dechlorinating bacterium | Sun et al., | 146 | 99.3 | ||||
| 2.4 | “ | 89 | Thermophilic phototroph | Tank et al., | N/A | ||||
| 2.1 | 88 | Thermophilic heterotroph | Kale et al., | N/A | |||||
| Chlorobi (p) | 1.9 | Unidentified bacterium clone K2-30-37 | 89 | Uncharacterized | Donachie et al., unpublished data | N/A | |||
| 1.7 | 87 | Thermophilic sulfate oxidizer | Beeder et al., | N/A | |||||
| AC1 (p) | 1.3 | Unidentified eubacterium from the Amazon | 86 | Uncharacterized soil bacterium | Borneman and Triplett, | N/A | |||
| 61.1 | |||||||||
| Core 2 surface | 11.1 | 98 | Lithoautotrophic Fe(II) oxidizer | Weiss et al., | N/A | ||||
| Chlorobi (p) | 9.6 | 84 | Facultative anaerobic heterotroph | Iino et al., | N/A | ||||
| 6.8 | “ | 88 | Ammonia oxidizer | Alves et al., unpublished data | 194 | 99.6 | |||
| 5.1 | “ | 83 | Lithoautotrophic acetogen | Nunoura et al., | N/A | ||||
| 3.4 | Chloroflexi bacterium SCGC AAA240-O05 | 88 | Uncharacterized | Swan et al., | N/A | ||||
| GAL15 (p) | 3.2 | 86 | Fe(III) reducer | Zavarzina et al., | N/A | ||||
| 3.2 | sulfate-reducing bacterium R-PropA1 | 88 | Sulfate reducer | Wind et al., unpublished data | N/A | ||||
| Chlorobi (p) | 2.1 | 83 | Facultative anaerobic heterotroph | Iino et al., | 39 | 99.3 | |||
| 2.1 | “ | 97 | Lithoautotrophic acetogen | Nunoura et al., | N/A | ||||
| Acidobacteria (p) | 2.1 | 87 | Uncharacterized thermophile | Sayeh et al., unpublished data | N/A | ||||
| 2.1 | 92 | Methanogen | Huynh et al., | 1 | 99.3 | ||||
| Chloroflexi (p) | 1.9 | Chloroflexi bacterium SCGC AAA240-C09 | 88 | Uncharacterized | Swan et al., | N/A | |||
| NC10 (p) | 1.7 | “ | 88 | Denitrifying methanotroph | He and Hu, unpublished data | N/A | |||
| 1.7 | 89 | Thermophilic anaerobic fermenter | Grégoire et al., | N/A | |||||
| 1.5 | Armatimonadetes bacterium JGI 0000077-K19 | 97 | Uncharacterized | Nobu et al., | N/A | ||||
| 1.5 | 91 | Thermophilic anaerobic fermenter | Nunoura et al., | N/A | |||||
| 1.3 | 95 | Denitrifying bacterium | Wang, unpublished data | N/A | |||||
| 1.3 | “ | 93 | Methane oxidizer, nitrate reducer | Ettwig et al., | N/A | ||||
| Acidobacteria (p) | 1.3 | 89 | Uncharacterized | Chen, unpublished data | N/A | ||||
| 1.1 | 90 | Fe(III), sulfate reduction | Henry et al., | N/A | |||||
| 64.3 | |||||||||
| Core 3 surface | 16.5 | “ | 97 | Ammonia oxidizer | Sauder et al., unpublished data | N/A | |||
| 10.7 | 87 | Thermophilic sulfate oxidizer | Beeder et al., | N/A | |||||
| Chlorobi (p) | 9.2 | 83 | Facultative anaerobic heterotroph | Iino et al., | 39 | 99.3 | |||
| Chlorobi (p) | 5.6 | 84 | Facultative anaerobic heterotroph | Iino et al., | N/A | ||||
| 4.1 | 87 | Thermophilic anaerobic mixotroph | Miroshnichenko et al., | 197.1 | 99.6 | ||||
| 3.8 | 98 | Lithoautotrophic Fe(II) oxidizer | Weiss et al., | N/A | |||||
| 3.0 | Bacterium strain CS35 | 87 | Uncharacterized | Das and Kerkar, unpublished data | N/A | ||||
| 2.4 | 91 | Thermophilic polysaccharolytic bacterium | Elcheninov et al., | 35.2 | 99.6 | ||||
| Acidobacteria (p) | 2.1 | 96 | Aerobic heterotroph | Pascual et al., | N/A | ||||
| 1.9 | 90 | Aerobic heterotroph | Zhao et al., | N/A | |||||
| Chlorobi (p) | 1.7 | Unidentified bacterium clone TK-NH7 | 88 | Uncharacterized | De Wever et al., unpublished data | N/A | |||
| 1.5 | Armatimonadetes bacterium JGI 0000077-K19 | 97 | Uncharacterized | Nobu et al., | N/A | ||||
| 1.5 | 86 | Thermophilic anaerobic fermenter | Grégoire et al., | N/A | |||||
| Chloroflexi (p) | 1.3 | Chloroflexi bacterium SCGC AAA240-C09 | 88 | Uncharacterized | Swan et al., | N/A | |||
| 1.3 | 95 | Thermophilic cyanobacterium | Singh et al., unpublished data | N/A | |||||
| 1.3 | 99 | Thermophilic nitrite oxidizer | Ehrich et al., | 128.2 | 98.9 | ||||
| 1.3 | 93 | Intracellular pathogen | Corsaro et al., | N/A | |||||
| 1.1 | 96 | Anoxygenic phototroph | Lee et al., unpublished data | N/A | |||||
| 1.1 | Phycisphaerae bacterium ST-NAGAB-D1 | 84 | Uncharacterized anaerobe | Spring et al., unpublished data | N/A | ||||
| 71.2 |
Letters in parentheses indicate taxonomic level: k, kingdom; p, phylum; c, class; o, order; f, family; g, genus.
Average percent read abundance across all CP core libraries (n = 42).
Total percent of reads comprising OTUs with >1% average read abundance.
As determined by NCBI BLASTn.
16S rRNA gene sequences recovered from MAGs using CheckM, and aligned to amplicon sequences using BLASTn.
Not applicable; no 16S rRNA gene sequences from MAGs aligned to this OUT.
Figure 2Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) ordination of pair-wise sample dissimilarity using weighted UniFrac metrics comparing samples from the 16S rRNA gene amplicon library of all CP cores and depth intervals. Zoomed-in panel highlights the less pronounced distribution of samples from cores 3, 4, and 5. Surface sample from each core is labeled in bold, and subsections are labeled with increasing depth. The 16S rRNA gene amplicon library from the CP vent pool water column sample was aligned and normalized to the CP core libraries in order to plot along with the core samples.
Microbial community composition of Chocolate Pots vent pool water column.
| 20.1 | 89% | Oxygenic photoautotroph | Cuzman et al., | 64% | 100% | |||
| 10.3 | 90% | Fe(III), sulfate reduction | Henry et al., | 74% | 98.8 | |||
| 2.6 | 99% | Anoxygenic photo(auto)troph | Klatt et al., | N/A | ||||
| 2.6 | 99% | Lithoautotrophic Fe(II) oxidizer | Weiss et al., | 17% | 100% | |||
| Chlorobi (p) | 2.2 | 87% | Thermophilic aerobic heterotroph | Marteinsson et al., | 16% | 100% | ||
| 2.2 | 96% | Denitrifying bacterium | Wang, unpublished data | 79% | 100% | |||
| 2.1 | 89% | Anoxygenic photoautotroph | Gibson et al., | 54% | 100% | |||
| 1.3 | 88% | Hydrogen oxidizer | Vander Roost et al., | 59% | 100% | |||
| 43.4 |
Letters in parentheses indicate taxonomic level: k, kingdom; p, phylum; c, class; o, order; f, family; g, genus.
Total percent of reads comprising OTUs with >1% average read abundance.
As determined by NCBI BLASTn.
16S rRNA gene sequences recovered from MAGs using CheckM, and aligned to amplicon sequences using BLASTn.
Not applicable; no 16S rRNA gene sequences from MAGs aligned to this OUT.
Figure 3Exploded pie chart on the left shows a distribution of MAGs and percentage of metagenomic sequence reads mapped to MAGs containing metabolic pathways of interest. Middle bars represent the MAGs identified in the three individual core metagenomes and the numbers of MAGs containing pathways of interest and percentage of reads mapped to those MAGs. Pie charts on the right show the breakdown of specific EET systems or CO2 fixation pathways present in each core sample. The total listed below each pie and bar chart represents the ratio of mapped reads in a given metagenomic assembly or pathway to the total number of mapped reads for that assembly. EET, extracellular electron transfer; CBB, Calvin-Benson-Bassham cycle; WL, Wood-Ljungdahl pathway; rTCA, reductive tricarboxylic acid cycle; 3HP, 3-hydroxypropionate bicycle.
Figure 5Distribution of MAGs from the metagenomic co-assembly of the CP cores containing putative metabolic pathways of interest, and percentage of metagenomic reads mapped to those MAGs. EET, extracellular electron transfer; CBB, Calvin-Benson-Bassham cycle; WL, Wood-Ljungdahl pathway; rTCA, reductive tricarboxylic acid cycle; 3HP, 3-hydroxypropionate bicycle.
Figure 4Rank-abundance plots of cores 1, 2, and 3 highlight the 20 most abundant taxa within each core sample. An average normalized read coverage of 7.94, 9.75, and 11.27 for MAGs in cores 1, 2, and 3, respectively, is marked with a horizontal dotted line. MAGs containing putative EET systems or CO2 fixation pathways are bolded and labeled with and E or C, respectively, or both for MAGs containing both putative metabolisms. MAG numbers are listed in parentheses.
Figure 6Distribution of MAGs from the metagenomic assembly of the CP vent pool water column containing putative metabolic pathways of interest and the percentage of metagenomic reads mapped to those MAGs. EET, extracellular electron transfer; CBB, Calvin-Benson-Bassham cycle; WL, Wood-Ljungdahl pathway; rTCA, reductive tricarboxylic acid cycle; 3HP, 3-hydroxypropionate bicycle.