Literature DB >> 30245551

Cumulative global forest carbon implications of regional bioenergy expansion policies.

Sei Jin Kim1, Justin S Baker2, Brent L Sohngen1, Michael Shell3.   

Abstract

Several previous studies have evaluated the potential greenhouse gas (GHG) benefits of forest biomass energy relative to fossil fuel equivalents over different spatial scales and time frames and applying a variety of methodologies. This paper contributes to this literature through an analysis of multiple projected sources of biomass demand growth in different regions of the world using a detailed intertemporal optimization model of the global forest sector. Given the range of current policies incentivizing bioenergy expansion globally, evaluating the combined global implications of regional bioenergy expansion efforts is critical for understanding the extent to which renewable energy supplied from forest biomass can contribute to various policy goals (including GHG emissions mitigation). Unlike previous studies that have been more regionally focused, this study provides a global perspective, illustrating how large potential demand increases for forest biomass in one or multiple regions can alter future forest management trends, markets, and forest carbon sequestration in key timber supply regions. Results show that potential near term (2015-2030) biomass demand growth in the U.S., Europe, and elsewhere can drive forest resource investment at the intensive and extensive margins, resulting in a net increase in forest carbon stocks for most regions of the world. When the reallocation of biomass away from traditional pulp and sawtimber markets is accounted for, net forest carbon sequestration increases (that stored on the land and in wood products) by 9.4 billion tons CO2 over the near term and 15.4 billion tons CO2 by 2095. Even if most of the increased forest biomass demand arises from one region (e.g., Europe) due to a particularly strong promotion of forest bioenergy expansion, changes in forest management globally in anticipation of this demand increase could result in carbon beneficial outcomes that can be shared by most regions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioenergy; Carbon sequestration; Forest management

Year:  2018        PMID: 30245551      PMCID: PMC6145497     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Resour Energy Econ        ISSN: 0928-7655


  4 in total

1.  Economic approach to assess the forest carbon implications of biomass energy.

Authors:  Adam Daigneault; Brent Sohngen; Roger Sedjo
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2012-05-09       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Climate change. Fixing a critical climate accounting error.

Authors:  Timothy D Searchinger; Steven P Hamburg; Jerry Melillo; William Chameides; Petr Havlik; Daniel M Kammen; Gene E Likens; Ruben N Lubowski; Michael Obersteiner; Michael Oppenheimer; G Philip Robertson; William H Schlesinger; G David Tilman
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-10-23       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Agricultural intensification in Brazil and its effects on land-use patterns: an analysis of the 1975-2006 period.

Authors:  Alberto G O P Barretto; Göran Berndes; Gerd Sparovek; Stefan Wirsenius
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 10.863

4.  Forest bioenergy or forest carbon? Assessing trade-offs in greenhouse gas mitigation with wood-based fuels.

Authors:  Jon McKechnie; Steve Colombo; Jiaxin Chen; Warren Mabee; Heather L MacLean
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2010-12-10       Impact factor: 9.028

  4 in total
  6 in total

1.  Modeling International Trade of Forest Products: Application of PPML to a Gravity Model of Trade.

Authors:  Justin Larson; Justin Baker; Gregory Latta; Sara Ohrel; Christopher Wade
Journal:  For Prod J       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 0.968

2.  Potential complementarity between forest carbon sequestration incentives and biomass energy expansion.

Authors:  J S Baker; C M Wade; B L Sohngen; S Ohrel; A A Fawcett
Journal:  Energy Policy       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 6.142

3.  Importance of Cross-Sector Interactions When Projecting Forest Carbon across Alternative Socioeconomic Futures.

Authors:  Jason P H Jones; Justin S Baker; Kemen Austin; Greg Latta; Christopher M Wade; Yongxia Cai; Lindsay Aramayo-Lipa; Robert Beach; Sara B Ohrel; Shaun Ragnauth; Jared Creason; Jeff Cole
Journal:  J For Econ       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 2.000

4.  The Influence of Parametric Uncertainty on Projections of Forest Land Use, Carbon, and Markets.

Authors:  Brent Sohngen; Marwa E Salem; Justin S Baker; Michael J Shell; Sei Jin Kim
Journal:  J For Econ       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 2.000

5.  Projecting the Spatial Distribution of Possible Planted Forest Expansion in the United States.

Authors:  Christopher M Wade; Justin S Baker; Gregory Latta; Sara B Ohrel; Justine Allpress
Journal:  J For       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 2.047

6.  The economic costs of planting, preserving, and managing the world's forests to mitigate climate change.

Authors:  K G Austin; J S Baker; B L Sohngen; C M Wade; A Daigneault; S B Ohrel; S Ragnauth; A Bean
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 14.919

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.