Literature DB >> 22515911

Economic approach to assess the forest carbon implications of biomass energy.

Adam Daigneault1, Brent Sohngen, Roger Sedjo.   

Abstract

There is widespread concern that biomass energy policy that promotes forests as a supply source will cause net carbon emissions. Most of the analyses that have been done to date, however, are biological, ignoring the effects of market adaptations through substitution, net imports, and timber investments. This paper uses a dynamic model of forest and land use management to estimate the impact of United States energy policies that emphasize the utilization of forest biomass on global timber production and carbon stocks over the next 50 years. We show that when market factors are included in the analysis, expanded demand for biomass energy increases timber prices and harvests, but reduces net global carbon emissions because higher wood prices lead to new investments in forest stocks. Estimates are sensitive to assumptions about whether harvest residues and new forestland can be used for biomass energy and the demand for biomass. Restricting biomass energy to being sourced only from roundwood on existing forestland can transform the policy from a net sink to a net source of emissions. These results illustrate the importance of capturing market adjustments and a large geographic scope when measuring the carbon implications of biomass energy policies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22515911     DOI: 10.1021/es2030142

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  8 in total

1.  Logging residue supply and costs for electricity generation: Potential variability and policy considerations.

Authors:  Justin S Baker; Adam Crouch; Yongxia Cai; Greg Latta; Sara Ohrel; Jason Jones; Annah Latané
Journal:  Energy Policy       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 6.142

2.  Cumulative global forest carbon implications of regional bioenergy expansion policies.

Authors:  Sei Jin Kim; Justin S Baker; Brent L Sohngen; Michael Shell
Journal:  Resour Energy Econ       Date:  2018-08

3.  Potential complementarity between forest carbon sequestration incentives and biomass energy expansion.

Authors:  J S Baker; C M Wade; B L Sohngen; S Ohrel; A A Fawcett
Journal:  Energy Policy       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 6.142

4.  The Influence of Parametric Uncertainty on Projections of Forest Land Use, Carbon, and Markets.

Authors:  Brent Sohngen; Marwa E Salem; Justin S Baker; Michael J Shell; Sei Jin Kim
Journal:  J For Econ       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 2.000

5.  Assessing Landscape Change and Processes of Recurrence, Replacement, and Recovery in the Southeastern Coastal Plains, USA.

Authors:  Mark A Drummond; Michael P Stier; Roger F Auch; Janis L Taylor; Glenn E Griffith; Jodi L Riegle; David J Hester; Christopher E Soulard; Jamie L McBeth
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2015-07-11       Impact factor: 3.266

6.  The economic costs of planting, preserving, and managing the world's forests to mitigate climate change.

Authors:  K G Austin; J S Baker; B L Sohngen; C M Wade; A Daigneault; S B Ohrel; S Ragnauth; A Bean
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Abatement cost of GHG emissions for wood-based electricity and ethanol at production and consumption levels.

Authors:  Puneet Dwivedi; Madhu Khanna
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Forests: Carbon sequestration, biomass energy, or both?

Authors:  Alice Favero; Adam Daigneault; Brent Sohngen
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 14.136

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.