Literature DB >> 30244924

Utilization, patency, and complications associated with vascular access for hemodialysis in the United States.

Isibor J Arhuidese1, Babak J Orandi2, Besma Nejim3, Mahmoud Malas4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study examines the utilization and outcomes of vascular access for long-term hemodialysis in the United States and describes the impact of temporizing catheter use on outcomes. We aimed to evaluate the prevalence, patency, and associated patient survival for pre-emptively placed autogenous fistulas and prosthetic grafts; for autogenous fistulas and prosthetic grafts placed after a temporizing catheter; and for hemodialysis catheters that remained in use.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of all patients who initiated hemodialysis in the United States during a 5-year period (2007-2011). The United States Renal Data System-Medicare matched national database was used to compare outcomes after pre-emptive autogenous fistulas, preemptive prosthetic grafts, autogenous fistula after temporizing catheter, prosthetic graft after temporizing catheter, and persistent catheter use. Outcomes were primary patency, primary assisted patency, secondary patency, maturation, catheter-free dialysis, severe access infection, and mortality.
RESULTS: There were 73,884 (16%) patients who initiated hemodialysis with autogenous fistula, 16,533 (3%) who initiated hemodialysis with prosthetic grafts, 106,797 (22%) who temporized with hemodialysis catheter prior to autogenous fistula use, 32,890 (7%) who temporized with catheter prior to prosthetic graft use, and 246,822 (52%) patients who remained on the catheter. Maturation rate and median time to maturation were 79% vs 84% and 47 days vs 29 days for pre-emptively placed autogenous fistulas vs prosthetic grafts. Primary patency (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.26; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.25-1.28; P < .001) and primary assisted patency (aHR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.35-1.38; P < .001) were significantly higher for autogenous fistula compared with prosthetic grafts. Secondary patency was higher for autogenous fistulas beyond 2 months (aHR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.32-1.40; P < .001). Severe infection (aHR, 9.6; 95% CI, 8.86-10.36; P < .001) and mortality (aHR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.27-1.31; P < .001) were higher for prosthetic grafts compared with autogenous fistulas. Temporizing with a catheter was associated with a 51% increase in mortality (aHR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.48-1.53; P < .001), 69% decrease in primary patency (aHR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.31-0.32; P < .001), and 130% increase in severe infection (aHR, 2.3; 95% CI, 2.2-2.5; P < .001) compared to initiation with autogenous fistulas or prosthetic grafts. Mortality was 2.2 times higher for patients who remained on catheters compared to those who initiated hemodialysis with autogenous fistulas (aHR, 2.25; 95% CI, 2.21-2.28; P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: Temporizing catheter use was associated with higher mortality, higher infection, and lower patency, thus undermining the highly prevalent approach of electively using catheters as a bridge to permanent access. Autogenous fistulas are associated with longer time to catheter-free dialysis but better patency, lower infection risk, and lower mortality compared with prosthetic grafts in the general population.
Copyright © 2018 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arteriovenous fistula; Arteriovenous graft; Autogenous fistula; Chronic kidney disease; Dialysis access; Dialysis catheter; End-stage renal disease; Hemodialysis access; Hemodialysis catheter; Permacath; Prosthetic graft

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30244924     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.01.049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  15 in total

1.  Outcomes of initial hemodialysis vascular access in patients initiating dialysis with a tunneled catheter.

Authors:  Timothy Copeland; Peter Lawrence; Karen Woo
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2019-05-27       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 2.  Epidemiology of end-stage kidney disease.

Authors:  Ryan Gupta; Karen Woo; Jeniann A Yi
Journal:  Semin Vasc Surg       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  Center-Effect of Incident Hemodialysis Vascular Access Use: Analysis of a Bi-national Registry.

Authors:  Samantha Ng; Elaine M Pascoe; David W Johnson; Carmel M Hawley; Kevan R Polkinghorne; Stephen McDonald; Philip A Clayton; Kannaiyan S Rabindranath; Matthew A Roberts; Ashley B Irish; Andrea K Viecelli
Journal:  Kidney360       Date:  2021-02-09

Review 4.  Hemodialysis care for undocumented immigrants with end-stage renal disease in the United States.

Authors:  Christine C Welles; Lilia Cervantes
Journal:  Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 3.416

5.  Arteriovenous Vascular Access-Related Procedural Burden Among Incident Hemodialysis Patients in the United States.

Authors:  Kenneth J Woodside; Kaitlyn J Repeck; Purna Mukhopadhyay; Douglas E Schaubel; Vahakn B Shahinian; Rajiv Saran; Ronald L Pisoni
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 11.072

6.  Role of peribrachial fat as a key determinant of brachial artery dilatation for successful arteriovenous fistula maturation in hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  Hyung Seok Lee; Mi Jin Park; Sam Youl Yoon; Narae Joo; Young Rim Song; Hyung Jik Kim; Sung Gyun Kim; Victor Nizet; Jwa-Kyung Kim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  The arteriovenous access stage (AVAS) classification.

Authors:  Peter Baláž; Jennifer Hanko; Hannah Magowan; Agnes Masengu; Katarina Lawrie; Stephen O'Neill
Journal:  Clin Kidney J       Date:  2020-11-20

8.  Trends in Procedures to Initiate Renal Replacement Therapy among People Living with Spina Bifida.

Authors:  Courtney S Streur; Nicholas M Moloci; Kate H Kraft; Aruna V Sarma; Vahakn B Shahinian; John M Hollingsworth
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Clinical outcomes associated with the use of the NexSite hemodialysis catheter with new exit barrier technology: Results from a prospective, observational multi-center registry study.

Authors:  Jeffrey G Hoggard; Richard D Blair; Manuel Montero; Moustafa A Moustafa; Joseph Newman; Pablo E Pergola; Nathan Saucier; Clarence J Wheeler; Leonard A Mermel; John R Ross; Anatole D Beserab
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Patient-Related Barriers to Timely Dialysis Access Preparation: A Qualitative Study of the Perspectives of Patients, Family Members, and Health Care Providers.

Authors:  Konstadina Griva; Pei Shing Seow; Terina Ying-Ying Seow; Zhong Sheng Goh; Jason Chon Jun Choo; Marjorie Foo; Stanton Newman
Journal:  Kidney Med       Date:  2019-12-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.