Literature DB >> 35373038

Center-Effect of Incident Hemodialysis Vascular Access Use: Analysis of a Bi-national Registry.

Samantha Ng1, Elaine M Pascoe2, David W Johnson1,2,3, Carmel M Hawley1,2,3, Kevan R Polkinghorne4,5,6, Stephen McDonald7, Philip A Clayton7, Kannaiyan S Rabindranath8, Matthew A Roberts7,9, Ashley B Irish10,11, Andrea K Viecelli1,2.   

Abstract

Background: Commencing hemodialysis (HD) with an arteriovenous access is associated with superior patient outcomes compared with a catheter, but the majority of patients in Australia and New Zealand initiate HD with a central venous catheter. This study examined patient and center factors associated with arteriovenous fistula/graft access use at HD commencement.
Methods: We included all adult patients starting chronic HD in Australia and New Zealand between 2004 and 2015. Access type at HD initiation was analyzed using logistic regression. Patient-level factors included sex, age, race, body mass index (BMI), smoking status, primary kidney disease, late nephrologist referral, comorbidities, and prior RRT. Center-level factors included size; transplant capability; home HD proportion; incident peritoneal dialysis (average number of patients commencing RRT with peritoneal dialysis per year); mean weekly HD hours; average blood flow; and achievement of phosphate, hemoglobin, and weekly Kt/V targets. The study included 27,123 patients from 61 centers.
Results: Arteriovenous access use at HD commencement varied four-fold from 15% to 62% (median 39%) across centers. Incident arteriovenous access use was more likely in patients aged 51-72 years, males, and patients with a BMI of >25 kg/m2 and polycystic kidney disease; but use was less likely in patients with a BMI of <18.5 kg/m2, late nephrologist referral, diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease, chronic lung disease, and prior RRT. Starting HD with an arteriovenous access was less likely in centers with the highest proportion of home HD, and no center factor was associated with higher arteriovenous access use. Adjustment for center-level characteristics resulted in a 25% reduction in observed intercenter variability of arteriovenous access use at HD initiation compared with the model adjusted for only patient-level characteristics. Conclusions: This study identified several patient and center factors associated with incident HD access use, yet these factors did not fully explain the substantial variability in arteriovenous access use across centers.
Copyright © 2021 by the American Society of Nephrology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  arteriovenous access; arteriovenous fistula; center characteristics; center effect; center size; center variation; central venous catheter; dialysis; hemodialysis; vascular access

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 35373038      PMCID: PMC8791318          DOI: 10.34067/KID.0005742020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Kidney360        ISSN: 2641-7650


  34 in total

1.  Choice of vascular access among incident hemodialysis patients: a decision and cost-utility analysis.

Authors:  Hui Xue; Eduardo Lacson; Weiling Wang; Gary C Curhan; Steven M Brunelli
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 8.237

2.  Focused vascular access education to reduce the use of chronic tunneled hemodialysis catheters: results of a network quality improvement initiative.

Authors:  Deuzimar Kulawik; Jeffrey J Sands; Kelly Mayo; Mary Fenderson; Janet Hutchinson; Cindy Woodward; Sally Gore; Arif Asif
Journal:  Semin Dial       Date:  2009 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.455

3.  Effect of a vascular access nurse coordinator to reduce central venous catheter use in incident hemodialysis patients: a quality improvement report.

Authors:  Kevan Roy Polkinghorne; Mechelle Seneviratne; Peter G Kerr
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2008-09-21       Impact factor: 8.860

4.  Hemodialysis Arteriovenous Vascular Access Creation After Kidney Transplant Failure.

Authors:  Joyce C Zhang; Ahmed Al-Jaishi; Jeffery Perl; Amit X Garg; Louise M Moist
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 8.860

5.  Type of vascular access and mortality in U.S. hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  R K Dhingra; E W Young; T E Hulbert-Shearon; S F Leavey; F K Port
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 10.612

6.  Establishment and maintenance of vascular access in incident hemodialysis patients: a prospective cost analysis.

Authors:  Braden Manns; Marcello Tonelli; Serdar Yilmaz; Helen Lee; Kevin Laupland; Scott Klarenbach; Val Radkevich; Brendan Murphy
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2004-11-24       Impact factor: 10.121

7.  Impact of surgeon selection on access placement and survival following preoperative mapping in the "Fistula First" era.

Authors:  Kenneth L Choi; Loay Salman; Gururaj Krishnamurthy; Carlos Mercado; Donna Merrill; Ian Thomas; Shukrat Artikov; Gabriel Contreras; Rao Ali Hashim Khan; Ali Warda; Arif Asif
Journal:  Semin Dial       Date:  2008-06-28       Impact factor: 3.455

8.  Impact of surgeon and surgical center characteristics on choice of permanent vascular access.

Authors:  Ann M O'Hare; R Adams Dudley; Denise M Hynes; Charles E McCulloch; Daniel Navarro; Philip Colin; Kevin Stroupe; Joseph Rapp; Kirsten L Johansen
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 10.612

9.  Obesity is not an obstacle for successful autogenous arteriovenous fistula creation in haemodialysis.

Authors:  Waclaw Weyde; Magdalena Krajewska; Waldemar Letachowicz; Tomasz Porazko; Ewa Watorek; Mariusz Kusztal; Miroslaw Banasik; Tomasz Golebiowski; Hanna Bartosik; Katarzyna Madziarska; Dariusz Janczak; Marian Klinger
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2007-10-23       Impact factor: 5.992

Review 10.  Clinical epidemiology of arteriovenous fistula in 2007.

Authors:  Pietro Ravani; Lawrence M Spergel; Arif Asif; Prabir Roy-Chaudhury; Anatole Besarab
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2007 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.902

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Epidemiology of haemodialysis outcomes.

Authors:  Aminu K Bello; Ikechi G Okpechi; Mohamed A Osman; Yeoungjee Cho; Htay Htay; Vivekanand Jha; Marina Wainstein; David W Johnson
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 42.439

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.