Literature DB >> 30244049

Presbyopia: Effectiveness of correction strategies.

James S Wolffsohn1, Leon N Davies2.   

Abstract

Presbyopia is a global problem affecting over a billion people worldwide. The prevalence of unmanaged presbyopia is as high as 50% of those over 50 years of age in developing world populations, due to a lack of awareness and accessibility to affordable treatment, and is even as high as 34% in developed countries. Definitions of presbyopia are inconsistent and varied, so we propose a redefinition that states "presbyopia occurs when the physiologically normal age-related reduction in the eye's focusing range reaches a point, when optimally corrected for distance vision, that the clarity of vision at near is insufficient to satisfy an individual's requirements". Strategies for correcting presbyopia include separate optical devices located in front of the visual system (reading glasses) or a change in the direction of gaze to view through optical zones of different optical powers (bifocal, trifocal or progressive addition spectacle lenses), monovision (with contact lenses, intraocular lenses, laser refractive surgery and corneal collagen shrinkage), simultaneous images (with contact lenses, intraocular lenses and corneal inlays), pinhole depth of focus expansion (with intraocular lenses, corneal inlays and pharmaceuticals), crystalline lens softening (with lasers or pharmaceuticals) or restored dynamics (with 'accommodating' intraocular lenses, scleral expansion techniques and ciliary muscle electrostimulation); these strategies may be applied differently to the two eyes to optimise the range of clear focus for an individual's task requirements and minimise adverse visual effects. However, none fully overcome presbyopia in all patients. While the restoration of natural accommodation or an equivalent remains elusive, guidance is given on presbyopic correction evaluation techniques.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Contact lenses; Monovision; Multifocal; Prebyopic corrections; Presbyopia; Refractive surgery; Spectacles

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30244049     DOI: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2018.09.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res        ISSN: 1350-9462            Impact factor:   21.198


  28 in total

1.  Vision Impairment and Blindness Prevalence in the United States: Variability of Vision Health Responses across Multiple National Surveys.

Authors:  David B Rein; Phoebe A Lamuda; John S Wittenborn; Nnenna Okeke; Clare E Davidson; Bonnielin K Swenor; Jinan Saaddine; Elizabeth A Lundeen
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2020-07-11       Impact factor: 12.079

2.  Monovision and the Misperception of Motion.

Authors:  Johannes Burge; Victor Rodriguez-Lopez; Carlos Dorronsoro
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Near Vision Spectacle Coverage and Associated Factors Among Adults Living in Finote Selam Town, Northwest Ethiopia: Community-Based Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Sofonias Fekadu; Abel Assem; Yitayeh Mengistu
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-10-07

4.  Comparative analysis of visual quality between unilateral implantation of a trifocal intraocular lens and a rotationally asymmetric refractive multifocal intraocular lens.

Authors:  Na Hui; Mei-Fang Chu; Yan Li; Cong-Yi Wang; Lei Yu; Bo Ma
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-09-18       Impact factor: 1.645

5.  Cost-Effectiveness of Presbyopia Correction Among Seven Strategies of Bilateral Cataract Surgery Based on a Prospective Single-Blind Two-Center Trial in China.

Authors:  Qianqian Lan; Yiyun Liu; Fan Xu; Min Li; Yaxin Li; Tingting Yang; Tong Sun; Gang Yao; Baikai Ma; Liyuan Tao; Xin Xiao; Xing Lin Feng; Siming Zeng; Hong Qi
Journal:  Ophthalmol Ther       Date:  2022-09-07

6.  Refractive outcomes and optical quality of PRESBYOND laser-blended vision for presbyopia correction.

Authors:  Dan Fu; Aruma Aruma; Ye Xu; Tian Han; Fei Xia; Xing-Tao Zhou
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-10-18       Impact factor: 1.645

7.  Assessing accommodative presbyopic biometric changes of the entire anterior segment using single swept-source OCT image acquisitions.

Authors:  Xiaobin Xie; William Sultan; Giulia Corradetti; Jong Yeon Lee; Abe Song; Anmol Pardeshi; Fei Yu; Vikas Chopra; Srinivas R Sadda; Benjamin Y Xu; Alex S Huang
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 3.775

8.  Improvement in Near Vision Following Silodosin Treatment in Patients With Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms.

Authors:  Hyun Jin Shin; Woo Suk Choi; Shin-Hyo Lee; Andrew G Lee; Aram Kim; Hyoung Keun Park; Sung Hyun Paick; Hyeong Gon Kim
Journal:  Int Neurourol J       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 2.835

Review 9.  Presbyopia - A Review of Current Treatment Options and Emerging Therapies.

Authors:  James A Katz; Paul M Karpecki; Alexandra Dorca; Sima Chiva-Razavi; Heather Floyd; Elizabeth Barnes; Mark Wuttke; Eric Donnenfeld
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-05-24

Review 10.  A Review of Pharmacological Presbyopia Treatment.

Authors:  Andrzej Grzybowski; Agne Markeviciute; Reda Zemaitiene
Journal:  Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila)       Date:  2020 May-Jun
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.