Literature DB >> 30243972

Low-frequency alternating current stimulation rhythmically suppresses gamma-band oscillations and impairs perceptual performance.

Jim D Herring1, Sophie Esterer2, Tom R Marshall3, Ole Jensen4, Til O Bergmann5.   

Abstract

Low frequency oscillations such as alpha (8-12 Hz) are hypothesized to rhythmically gate sensory processing, reflected by 40-100 Hz gamma band activity, via the mechanism of pulsed inhibition. We applied transcranial alternating current stimulation (TACS) at individual alpha frequency (IAF) and flanking frequencies (IAF-4 Hz, IAF+4 Hz) to the occipital cortex of healthy human volunteers during concurrent magnetoencephalography (MEG), while participants performed a visual detection task inducing strong gamma-band responses. Occipital (but not retinal) TACS phasically suppressed stimulus-induced gamma oscillations in the visual cortex and impaired target detection, with stronger phase-to-amplitude coupling predicting behavioral impairments. Retinal control TACS ruled out retino-thalamo-cortical entrainment resulting from (subthreshold) retinal stimulation. All TACS frequencies tested were effective, suggesting that visual gamma-band responses can be modulated by a range of low frequency oscillations. We propose that TACS-induced membrane potential modulations mimic the rhythmic change in cortical excitability by which spontaneous low frequency oscillations may eventually exert their impact when gating sensory processing via pulsed inhibition.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alpha; Gamma; Phase-amplitude coupling (PAC); TACS-MEG; Visual cortex; Visual detection

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30243972     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.09.047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  10 in total

Review 1.  A New Unifying Account of the Roles of Neuronal Entrainment.

Authors:  Peter Lakatos; Joachim Gross; Gregor Thut
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 2.  Current challenges: the ups and downs of tACS.

Authors:  Nicholas S Bland; Martin V Sale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Discordant Alpha-Band Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Affects Cortico-Cortical and Cortico-Cerebellar Connectivity.

Authors:  Claudia D Tesche; Jon M Houck
Journal:  Brain Connect       Date:  2020-05-06

Review 4.  Effects of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation and Neurofeedback on Alpha (EEG) Dynamics: A Review.

Authors:  Mária Orendáčová; Eugen Kvašňák
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Hemisphere-specific, differential effects of lateralized, occipital-parietal α- versus γ-tACS on endogenous but not exogenous visual-spatial attention.

Authors:  Florian H Kasten; Tea Wendeln; Heiko I Stecher; Christoph S Herrmann
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Brain State-Dependent Brain Stimulation.

Authors:  Til O Bergmann
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-11-01

7.  Can Oscillatory Alpha-Gamma Phase-Amplitude Coupling be Used to Understand and Enhance TMS Effects?

Authors:  Johanna Wagner; Scott Makeig; David Hoopes; Mateusz Gola
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Pulsed Facilitation of Corticospinal Excitability by the Sensorimotor μ-Alpha Rhythm.

Authors:  Til Ole Bergmann; Anne Lieb; Christoph Zrenner; Ulf Ziemann
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Signal-Space Projection Suppresses the tACS Artifact in EEG Recordings.

Authors:  Johannes Vosskuhl; Tuomas P Mutanen; Toralf Neuling; Risto J Ilmoniemi; Christoph S Herrmann
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Non-invasive electrical brain stimulation for vision restoration after stroke: An exploratory randomized trial (REVIS).

Authors:  Silja Räty; Carolin Borrmann; Giuseppe Granata; Lizbeth Cárdenas-Morales; Ariel Schoenfeld; Michael Sailer; Katri Silvennoinen; Juha Holopainen; Francesca De Rossi; Andrea Antal; Paolo M Rossini; Turgut Tatlisumak; Bernhard A Sabel
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.406

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.