Literature DB >> 30243771

Explaining all without causing unnecessary harm: Is there scope for positively framing medical risk information?

R K Webster1, J Weinman2, G J Rubin3.   

Abstract

Clinicians in the United Kingdom are now legally obliged to tell patients about every risk involved in prescribed medical treatments. Although important for informed consent, warning patients of risks such as side-effects can increase the incidence of these very side-effects, through the nocebo effect. Positively framing risk information could be a potential solution to this dilemma, and preliminary data has shown it is effective in healthy volunteers receiving a sham drug. Future research is needed to test its effectiveness in a clinical population.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Nocebo effects; Positive framing; Risk communication; Side-Effects

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30243771     DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.09.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient Educ Couns        ISSN: 0738-3991


  5 in total

1.  Positive Attribute Framing Increases COVID-19 Booster Vaccine Intention for Unfamiliar Vaccines.

Authors:  Kirsten Barnes; Ben Colagiuri
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-16

2.  Agreement and Disparities between Women and Stop-Smoking Specialists about How to Promote Adherence to Nicotine Replacement Therapy in Pregnancy.

Authors:  Lisa McDaid; Ross Thomson; Joanne Emery; Tim Coleman; Sue Cooper; Lucy Phillips; Felix Naughton
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 3.  Effective communication regarding risk of fracture for individuals at risk of fragility fracture: a scoping review.

Authors:  Charlotte Beaudart; Mickael Hiligsmann; Nannan Li; E Michael Lewiecki; Stuart Silverman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Coding linguistic elements in clinical interactions: a step-by-step guide for analyzing communication form.

Authors:  Inge Stortenbeker; Lisa Salm; Tim Olde Hartman; Wyke Stommel; Enny Das; Sandra van Dulmen
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 4.612

Review 5.  A systematic review of factors associated with side-effect expectations from medical interventions.

Authors:  Louise E Smith; Rebecca K Webster; G James Rubin
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 3.377

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.