Literature DB >> 30240203

Choice of Adaptive Sampling Strategy Impacts State Discovery, Transition Probabilities, and the Apparent Mechanism of Conformational Changes.

Maxwell I Zimmerman1, Justin R Porter1, Xianqiang Sun1, Roseane R Silva1, Gregory R Bowman1.   

Abstract

Interest in atomically detailed simulations has grown significantly with recent advances in computational hardware and Markov state modeling (MSM) methods, yet outstanding questions remain that hinder their widespread adoption. Namely, how do alternative sampling strategies explore conformational space and how might this influence predictions generated from the data? Here, we seek to answer these questions for four commonly used sampling methods: (1) a single long simulation, (2) many short simulations run in parallel, (3) adaptive sampling, and (4) our recently developed goal-oriented sampling algorithm, FAST. We first develop a theoretical framework for analytically calculating the probability of discovering select states on simple landscapes, where we uncover the drastic effects of varying the number and length of simulations. We then use kinetic Monte Carlo simulations on a variety of physically inspired landscapes to characterize the probability of discovering particular states and transition pathways for each of the four methods. Consistently, we find that FAST simulations discover each target state with the highest probability, while traversing realistic pathways. Furthermore, we uncover the potential pathology that short parallel simulations sometimes predict an incorrect transition pathway by crossing large energy barriers that long simulations would typically circumnavigate. We refer to this pathology as "pathway tunneling". To protect against this phenomenon when using adaptive-sampling and FAST simulations, we introduce the FAST-string method. This method enhances sampling along the highest-flux transition paths to refine an MSMs transition probabilities and discriminate between competing pathways. Additionally, we compare the performance of a variety of MSM estimators in describing accurate thermodynamics and kinetics. For adaptive sampling, we recommend simply normalizing the transition counts out of each state after adding small pseudocounts to avoid creating sources or sinks. Lastly, we evaluate whether our insights from simple landscapes hold for all-atom molecular dynamics simulations of the folding of the λ-repressor protein. Remarkably, we find that FAST-contacts predicts the same folding pathway as a set of long simulations but with orders of magnitude less simulation time.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 30240203      PMCID: PMC6571142          DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.8b00500

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput        ISSN: 1549-9618            Impact factor:   6.006


  17 in total

1.  The dynamic conformational landscape of the protein methyltransferase SETD8.

Authors:  Shi Chen; Rafal P Wiewiora; Fanwang Meng; Nicolas Babault; Anqi Ma; Wenyu Yu; Kun Qian; Hao Hu; Hua Zou; Junyi Wang; Shijie Fan; Gil Blum; Fabio Pittella-Silva; Kyle A Beauchamp; Wolfram Tempel; Hualiang Jiang; Kaixian Chen; Robert J Skene; Yujun George Zheng; Peter J Brown; Jian Jin; Cheng Luo; John D Chodera; Minkui Luo
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-05-13       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 2.  Markov State Models to Elucidate Ligand Binding Mechanism.

Authors:  Yunhui Ge; Vincent A Voelz
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

3.  Enspara: Modeling molecular ensembles with scalable data structures and parallel computing.

Authors:  J R Porter; M I Zimmerman; G R Bowman
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 3.488

4.  Markov state modeling reveals alternative unbinding pathways for peptide-MHC complexes.

Authors:  Jayvee R Abella; Dinler Antunes; Kyle Jackson; Gregory Lizée; Cecilia Clementi; Lydia E Kavraki
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Adaptive Markov state model estimation using short reseeding trajectories.

Authors:  Hongbin Wan; Vincent A Voelz
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 3.488

6.  Structure-Based Analysis of Cryptic-Site Opening.

Authors:  Zhuyezi Sun; Amanda Elizabeth Wakefield; Istvan Kolossvary; Dmitri Beglov; Sandor Vajda
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 5.006

7.  Markov state modelling reveals heterogeneous drug-inhibition mechanism of Calmodulin.

Authors:  Annie M Westerlund; Akshay Sridhar; Leo Dahl; Alma Andersson; Anna-Yaroslava Bodnar; Lucie Delemotte
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-10-07       Impact factor: 4.779

Review 8.  Multiscale kinetic analysis of proteins.

Authors:  Jessica Mj Swanson
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 7.786

9.  High-resolution mining of the SARS-CoV-2 main protease conformational space: supercomputer-driven unsupervised adaptive sampling.

Authors:  Théo Jaffrelot Inizan; Frédéric Célerse; Olivier Adjoua; Dina El Ahdab; Luc-Henri Jolly; Chengwen Liu; Pengyu Ren; Matthieu Montes; Nathalie Lagarde; Louis Lagardère; Pierre Monmarché; Jean-Philip Piquemal
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 9.825

10.  SARS-CoV-2 simulations go exascale to predict dramatic spike opening and cryptic pockets across the proteome.

Authors:  Maxwell I Zimmerman; Justin R Porter; Michael D Ward; Sukrit Singh; Neha Vithani; Artur Meller; Upasana L Mallimadugula; Catherine E Kuhn; Jonathan H Borowsky; Rafal P Wiewiora; Matthew F D Hurley; Aoife M Harbison; Carl A Fogarty; Joseph E Coffland; Elisa Fadda; Vincent A Voelz; John D Chodera; Gregory R Bowman
Journal:  Nat Chem       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 24.427

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.