| Literature DB >> 30239012 |
Moses Egesa1,2, Lawrence Lubyayi2, Frances M Jones3, Angela van Diepen4, Iain W Chalmers5, Edridah M Tukahebwa6, Bernard S Bagaya7, Cornelis H Hokke4, Karl F Hoffmann5, David W Dunne3, Alison M Elliott2,8, Maria Yazdanbakhsh4, Shona Wilson3, Stephen Cose2,8.
Abstract
While antigens from Schistosoma schistosomula have been suggested as potential vaccine candidates, the association between antibody responses with schistosomula antigens and infection intensity at reinfection is not well known. Schistosoma mansoni-infected individuals were recruited from a schistosomiasis endemic area in Uganda (n = 372), treated with 40 mg/kg praziquantel (PZQ) and followed up at five weeks and at one year post-treatment. Pre-treatment and five weeks post-treatment immunoglobulin (Ig) E, IgG1 and IgG4 levels against recombinant schistosomula antigens rSmKK7, rSmLy6A, rSmLy6B and rSmTSP7 were measured using ELISA. Factors associated with detectable pre-treatment or post-treatment antibody response against the schistosomula antigens and the association between five-week antibody responses and one year post-treatment reinfection intensity among antibody responders were examined. Being male was associated with higher pre-treatment IgG1 to rSmKK7, rSmLy6a and AWA. Five weeks post-treatment antibody responses against schistosomula antigens were not associated with one year post-treatment reinfection intensity among antibody responders' antibody levels against rSmKK7, rSmLy6B and rSmTSP7 dropped, but increased against rSmLy6A, AWA and SEA at five weeks post-treatment among antibody responders. S. mansoni-infected individuals exhibit detectable antibody responses to schistosomula antigens that are affected by treatment. These findings indicate that schistosomula antigens induce highly varied antibody responses and could have implications for vaccine development.Entities:
Keywords: zzm321990Schistosoma mansonizzm321990; IgE; antibody responder; reinfection; schistosomula antigens
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30239012 PMCID: PMC6492298 DOI: 10.1111/pim.12591
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasite Immunol ISSN: 0141-9838 Impact factor: 2.280
Figure 1The study profile describing the screening, recruitment and follow‐up of the study participants
Baseline demographics of the study participants (N = 240)
| Factor | Level | n (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Sex | Female | 135 (56) |
| Age (years) | 6‐9 | 74 (31) |
| 10‐13 | 76 (32) | |
| >14 | 90 (37) | |
| Pre‐treatment infection intensity (epg) | Light (1‐99) | 44 (18) |
| Moderate (100‐399) | 41 (17) | |
| Heavy (>400) | 155 (65) |
Antibody responders to the schistosomula antigens
| Antibody | Antibody responders, n (%) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SmKK7 | SmLy6a | SmLy6b | SmTSP7 | AWA | SEA | |
| IgG1 | 152 (63.3) | 32 (13.33) | 182 (76.3) | 105 (43.8) | 220 (91.7) | 223 (92.9) |
| IgG4 | 51 (21.3) | 9 (3.8) | 28 (11.7) | 15 (6.3) | 219 (91.3) | 233 (97.1) |
| IgE | 63 (26.3) | 9 (3.8) | 104 (43.3) | 13 (5.4) | 123 (51.3) | 75 (31.3) |
As a percentage of the 240 individuals whose data were analysed.
Factors associated with pre‐treatment IgG1, IgG4 and IgE detectable response against crude Schistosoma mansoni antigens
| Antigen | Factor | Level | IgG1 | IgG4 | IgE | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adjusted |
| Adjusted |
| Adjusted |
| |||
| AWA | Sex | Female | 1 | 0.013 | 1 | 0.125 | 1 | 0.005 |
| Male | 5.00 (1.40‐17.86) | 2.20 (0.80‐5.99) | 2.15 (1.25‐3.68) | |||||
| Age (years) | 6 to 9 | 1 | 0.089 | 1 | 0.203 | 1 | 0.031 | |
| 10 to 13 | 4.09 (0.78‐21.37) | 3.32 (0.84‐13.24) | 2.19 (1.12‐4.29) | |||||
| 14+ | 0.73 (0.25‐2.10) | 0.54 (0.15‐2.01) | 2.17 (1.13‐4.14) | |||||
| SEA | Sex | Female | 1 | 0.290 | 1 | 0.368 | 1 | 0.029 |
| Male | 1.81 (0.60‐5.48) | 2.17 (0.40‐11.73) | 1.87 (1.07‐3.26) | |||||
| Age (years) | 6 to 9 | 1 | 0.037 | 1 | 0.560 | 1 | 0.854 | |
| 10 to 13 | 4.67 (0.51‐43.19) | 3.54 (0.35‐35.33) | 0.82 (0.41‐1.65) | |||||
| 14+ | 0.41 (0.13‐1.35) | 1.41 (0.26‐7.37) | 0.88 (0.45‐3.00) | |||||
OR, odds ratio.
Adjusted for either sex or age.
Factors associated with pre‐treatment IgG1, IgG4 and IgE detectable responses against Schistosoma mansoni schistosomula antigens
| Antigen | Factor | Level | IgG1 | IgG4 | IgE | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adjusted |
| Adjusted |
| Adjusted |
| |||
| SmKK7 | Sex | Female | 1 | 0.009 | 1 | 0.143 | 1 | 0.625 |
| Male | 2.09 (1.20‐3.65) | 1.62 (0.85‐3.07) | 0.86 (0.48‐1.56) | |||||
| Age (years) | 6 to 9 | 1 | 0.739 | 1 | 0.019 | 1 | 0.943 | |
| 10 to 13 | 1.31 (0.66‐2.60) | 1.96 (0.92‐4.18) | 0.88 (0.42‐1.84) | |||||
| 14+ | 1.15 (0.60‐2.21) | 0.66 (0.28‐1.53) | 0.96 (0.60‐2.21) | |||||
| SmLy6a | Sex | Female | 1 | 0.006 | 1 | 0.073 | 1 | 0.549 |
| Male | 3.13 (1.39‐7.02) | 4.37 (0.87‐21.89) | 1.5 (0.39‐5.91) | |||||
| Age (years) | 6 to 9 | 1 | 0.441 | 1 | 0.380 | 1 | 0.716 | |
| 10 to 13 | 0.93 (0.37‐2.28) | 1.18 (0.27‐5.04) | 0.51 (0.09‐2.85) | |||||
| 14+ | 1.15 (0.21‐1.45) | 0.25 (0.03‐2.31) | 0.65 (0.13‐3.08) | |||||
| SmLy6b | Sex | Female | 1 | 0.304 | 1 | 0.713 | 1 | 0.438 |
| Male | 1.39 (0.74‐2.59) | 1.17 (0.51‐2.67) | 0.81 (0.48‐1.38) | |||||
| Age (years) | 6 to 9 | 1 | 0.069 | 1 | 0.001 | 1 | 0.082 | |
| 10 to 13 | 2.47 (1.08‐5.61) | 3.60 (1.33‐9.76) | 1.98 (1.02‐3.83) | |||||
| 14+ | 1.10 (0.54‐2.20) | 0.54 (0.15‐2.01) | 1.12 (0.59‐2.12) | |||||
| SmTSP7 | Sex | Female | 1 | 0.798 | 1 | 0.117 | 1 | 0.186 |
| Male | 1.07 (0.63‐1.81) | 2.46 (0.79‐7.56) | 2.19 (0.68‐7.00) | |||||
| Age (years) | 6 to 9 | 1 | 0.309 | 1 | 0.224 | 1 | 0.969 | |
| 10 to 13 | 1.58 (0.82‐3.06) | 0.93 (0.29‐2.96) | 1.08 (0.26‐4.58) | |||||
| 14+ | 1.54 (0.82‐2.92) | 0.25 (0.05‐1.28) | 1.19 (0.30‐4.71) | |||||
OR, odds ratio.
Adjusted for either sex or age.
Figure 2The correlation between the pre‐treatment and one year post‐treatment infection intensity of the study participants (n = 240)
Association between detectable five weeks post‐treatment IgG1, IgG4 and IgE responses against schistosomula antigens and reinfection intensity
| Antibody | Antigen | Crude OR (95% CI) |
| Adjusted |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IgG1 | rSmKK7 | 0.71 (0.34‐1.51) | 0.377 | 1.01 (0.44‐2.30) | 0.986 |
| rSmLy6A | 0.27 (0.11‐0.64) | 0.004 | 0.43 (0.16‐1.11) | 0.082 | |
| rSmLy6B | 0.50 (0.24‐1.07) | 0.073 | 0.80 (0.35‐1.82) | 0.592 | |
| rSmTSP7 | 0.93 (0.43‐1.96) | 0.838 | 1.02 (0.45‐2.31) | 0.956 | |
| AWA | 0.21 (0.01‐3.58) | 0.287 | 0.62 (0.04‐10.47) | 0.741 | |
| SEA | 1.59 (0.18‐13.39) | 0.668 | 2.18 (0.23‐19.97) | 0.489 | |
| IgG4 | rSmKK7 | 0.49 (0.13‐1.73) | 0.269 | 0.58 (0.15‐2.27) | 0.439 |
| rSmLy6A | 0.72 (0.19‐2.60) | 0.616 | 0.70 (0.18‐2.76) | 0.608 | |
| rSmLy6B | 0.37 (0.08‐1.65) | 0.193 | 0.42 (0.09‐2.05) | 0.285 | |
| rSmTSP7 | 1.56 (0.46‐5.16) | 0.470 | 2.17 (0.56‐8.48) | 0.265 | |
| AWA | 0.89 (0.18‐4.39) | 0.885 | 1.04 (0.19‐5.74) | 0.964 | |
| SEA | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | |
| IgE | rSmKK7 | 0.74 (0.29‐1.94) | 0.546 | 0.82 (0.29‐2.29) | 0.701 |
| rSmLy6A | 0.72 (0.19‐2.59) | 0.616 | 0.54 (0.14‐2.09) | 0.371 | |
| rSmLy6B | 0.98 (0.45‐2.10) | 0.950 | 1.34 (0.57‐3.12) | 0.496 | |
| rSmTSP7 | 0.68 (0.18‐2.43) | 0.551 | 0.48 (0.12‐1.82) | 0.279 | |
| AWA | 1.29 (0.59‐2.84) | 0.527 | 1.10 (0.46‐2.62) | 0.825 | |
| SEA | 1.31 (0.63‐2.78) | 0.468 | 1.19 (0.53‐2.71) | 0.671 |
OR, odds ratio.
Adjusted for sex and gender.
Figure 3The effect of treatment on antibody responses against the recombinant schistosomula antigens SmKK7 (IgG1: n = 135, IgG4: n = 20 and IgE: n = 51), SmLy6A (IgG1: n = 25, IgG4: n = 3 and IgE: n = 4), SmLy6B (IgG1: n = 163, IgG4: n = 3 and IgE: n = 90) and SmTSP7 (IgG1: n = 90, IgG4: n = 8 and IgE: n = 8) among antibody responders. The boxes indicate the interquartile range with median as the horizontal line, while the whiskers indicate minimum and maximum antibody levels. The dots are outliers. Pre‐Tx, pre‐treatment antibody levels; Post‐Tx, 5 weeks post‐treatment antibody levels; * P < 0.0125 (P‐value adjusted to take into account the multiple comparison), **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001