Literature DB >> 30238185

YouTube as a source of information in retinopathy of prematurity.

Alparslan Şahin1, Muhammed Şahin2, Fatih Mehmet Türkcü3.   

Abstract

AIM: We aimed to evaluate the quality of information available on YouTube regarding the basic information, examination, diagnosis, and the treatment of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP).
METHODS: A YouTube search was performed on https://www.youtube.com / for videos pertaining to "retinopathy of prematurity" and "ROP." The first 100 relevant videos were included in the study. Two ophthalmologist reviewers independently evaluated and classified the videos as useful or misleading. The videos were accepted as "useful," if they provide scientifically correct information about any aspect of ROP: cause, pathogenesis, symptoms, findings, treatments, procedure details of the treatment, epidemiology, and prognosis. The videos contain scientifically unproven information are defined as "misleading." Videos were also classified according to the source: surgeon/practitioner, independent user, hospital/free clinic, social media/TV, medical site, university, and advertisement.
RESULTS: The mean duration, the mean days on YouTube, the mean comments per videos, and the mean dislikes per video were similar in useful and misleading videos. However, the mean likes per day, mean view per video, and mean view per day were significantly higher in useful videos than those of misleading videos (p = 0.004, p = 0.022, and p = 0.011, respectively). Most of the useful videos were uploaded by healthcare professionals including source from university, hospital/free clinic, and surgeon/practitioner (48/64). The videos uploaded by healthcare professionals were more useful compared to those of non-healthcare professionals (p = 0.029).
CONCLUSION: YouTube could be used as an important tool for patient information in ROP. However, one third of the YouTube videos regarding ROP are misleading and may present a risk of harmful consequences. In this aspect, authoritative videos by healthcare professionals should be uploaded for dissemination of reliable information on ROP.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Patient information; Retinopathy of prematurity; YouTube videos

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30238185     DOI: 10.1007/s11845-018-1902-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ir J Med Sci        ISSN: 0021-1265            Impact factor:   1.568


  9 in total

1.  Does YouTube provide high quality information? Assessment of secukinumab videos.

Authors:  Burhan Fatih Kocyigit; Mazlum Serdar Akaltun
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 2.631

2.  Is YouTube a reliable source of health-related information? A systematic review.

Authors:  Wael Osman; Fatma Mohamed; Mohamed Elhassan; Abdulhadi Shoufan
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 3.263

3.  Assessment of the Quality and Reliability of YouTube Videos on Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy.

Authors:  Ruveyde Bolac; Yucel Ozturk; Elvin Yildiz
Journal:  Beyoglu Eye J       Date:  2022-05-27

4.  Evaluation of YouTube videos as sources of information about complex regional pain syndrome.

Authors:  Aylin Altun; Ayhan Askin; Ilker Sengul; Nazrin Aghazada; Yagmur Aydin
Journal:  Korean J Pain       Date:  2022-07-01

5.  Navigating Social Media in #Ophthalmology.

Authors:  Edmund Tsui; Rajesh C Rao
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 14.277

6.  The use of Online Videos for Vitreoretinal Surgery Training: A Comprehensive Analysis.

Authors:  Isil Kutluturk; Veysel Aykut; Ebubekir Durmus
Journal:  Beyoglu Eye J       Date:  2022-02-18

7.  Evaluation of the Usefulness of YouTube Videos on Retinal Detachment Surgery.

Authors:  Murat Serkan Songur; Mehmet Citirik
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-11-10

8.  Quality of online video resources concerning patient education for neck pain: A YouTube-based quality-control study.

Authors:  Xiang Zhang; Yi Yang; Yi-Wei Shen; Ke-Rui Zhang; Li-Tai Ma; Chen Ding; Bei-Yu Wang; Yang Meng; Hao Liu
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-09-21

9.  YouTube™ as a source of information for Candida auris infection: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jiangqing Huang; Shengcen Zhang; Qirong Xiao; Yingping Cao; Bin Li
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 3.295

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.