Savithri Nageswaran1, Shannon L Golden2, W Adam Gower3, Nancy M P King2. 1. Department of Pediatrics, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC. Electronic address: snageswa@wakehealth.edu. 2. Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC. 3. Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To describe the perceptions of caregivers of children with medical complexity (CMC) about their decision to pursue tracheostomy for their children, in particular the satisfaction with their decision. STUDY DESIGN: In this qualitative study conducted in western North Carolina between 2013 and 2014, we interviewed 56 caregivers of 41 CMC who had received tracheostomies in the past 5 years. Three of the CMC were deceased at the time of the interview; 8 were decannulated. In-depth interviews (35 English, 6 Spanish) were conducted, audio-recorded, and transcribed verbatim. We used ATLAS.ti software to manage data and identified themes related to caregiver perceptions about tracheostomy decision. RESULTS: We found that caregivers often chose tracheostomy because extending the lives of their children and being able to care for them at home were important. Caregivers reported the many benefits of tracheostomy including improvement in respiratory symptoms, physical and developmental health, quality of life, and means to provide medical care quickly when needed. There were negative effects of tracheostomy such as mucous plugs, excessive secretions, accidental decannulation necessitating emergency tracheostomy tube change, and the increased infection risk. Providing medical care for CMC with tracheostomy at home was difficult, but improved over time. Caregivers were generally satisfied with their decision to pursue tracheostomy for their CMC. CONCLUSIONS: Decisional satisfaction with tracheostomy for CMC is high. In counseling caregivers about tracheostomy, clinicians should present both the benefits and risks. Future studies should quantify the outcomes described in this study.
OBJECTIVE: To describe the perceptions of caregivers of children with medical complexity (CMC) about their decision to pursue tracheostomy for their children, in particular the satisfaction with their decision. STUDY DESIGN: In this qualitative study conducted in western North Carolina between 2013 and 2014, we interviewed 56 caregivers of 41 CMC who had received tracheostomies in the past 5 years. Three of the CMC were deceased at the time of the interview; 8 were decannulated. In-depth interviews (35 English, 6 Spanish) were conducted, audio-recorded, and transcribed verbatim. We used ATLAS.ti software to manage data and identified themes related to caregiver perceptions about tracheostomy decision. RESULTS: We found that caregivers often chose tracheostomy because extending the lives of their children and being able to care for them at home were important. Caregivers reported the many benefits of tracheostomy including improvement in respiratory symptoms, physical and developmental health, quality of life, and means to provide medical care quickly when needed. There were negative effects of tracheostomy such as mucous plugs, excessive secretions, accidental decannulation necessitating emergency tracheostomy tube change, and the increased infection risk. Providing medical care for CMC with tracheostomy at home was difficult, but improved over time. Caregivers were generally satisfied with their decision to pursue tracheostomy for their CMC. CONCLUSIONS: Decisional satisfaction with tracheostomy for CMC is high. In counseling caregivers about tracheostomy, clinicians should present both the benefits and risks. Future studies should quantify the outcomes described in this study.
Authors: Mona L McPherson; Lara Shekerdemian; Michelle Goldsworthy; Charles G Minard; Cynthia S Nelson; Fernando Stein; Jeanine M Graf Journal: Pediatr Pulmonol Date: 2017-03-06
Authors: Gulnur Com; Dennis Z Kuo; Martin L Bauer; Claire V Lenker; Maria M Melguizo-Castro; Todd G Nick; Christopher M Makris Journal: Clin Pediatr (Phila) Date: 2012-11-14 Impact factor: 1.168
Authors: Jamie C Brehaut; Annette M O'Connor; Timothy J Wood; Thomas F Hack; Laura Siminoff; Elisa Gordon; Deb Feldman-Stewart Journal: Med Decis Making Date: 2003 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 2.583
Authors: Joseph G Kohne; Graeme MacLaren; Erica Rider; Benjamin D Carr; Palen Mallory; Acham Gebremariam; Matthew L Friedman; Ryan P Barbaro Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2022-01-26 Impact factor: 3.971
Authors: Tessie W October; Amy H Jones; Hannah Greenlick Michals; Lauren M Hebert; Jiji Jiang; Jichuan Wang Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2020-02 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: Jeffrey D Edwards; Howard B Panitch; Maureen George; Anne-Marie Cirrilla; Eli Grunstein; Joanne Wolfe; Judith E Nelson; Rachel L Miller Journal: Pediatr Pulmonol Date: 2020-12-23