Literature DB >> 30236033

A qualitative study exploring views and experiences of people with stroke undergoing transcranial direct current stimulation and upper limb robot therapy.

L Tedesco Triccas1,2, J H Burridge1, A M Hughes1, K L Meadmore1, M Donovan-Hall1, J C Rothwell3, G Verheyden2.   

Abstract

Background Neurorehabilitation technologies used mainly in research such as robot therapy (RT) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) can promote upper limb motor recovery after stroke. Understanding the feasibility and efficacy of stroke rehabilitation technologies for upper limb impairments is crucial for effective implementation in practice. Small studies have explored views of RT by people with stroke; however experiences of people receiving tDCS in combination with RT have never been explored. Objective To explore views and experiences of people with sub-acute and chronic stroke that had previously taken part in a randomised controlled trial involving tDCS and RT for their impaired upper limb. Methods An interview study includes open and closed questions. Face-to-face interviews were audio recorded. Open-ended question responses were transcribed and analyzed using thematic analysis; closed questions were analyzed using descriptive analysis. Results Participants felt that RT was enjoyable (90%) and beneficial for their affected arm (100%). From the open question data, it was found that the intervention was effective for the impaired arm especially in the sub-acute stage. Main reported concerns were that tDCS caused painful, itching and burning sensations and RT was sometimes tiring and difficult. Participants recommended that future research should focus on designing a more comfortable method of tDCS and develop a robot that promotes hand movements. Conclusions This study provides new knowledge about the benefits and barriers associated with these technologies which are crucial to the future effective implementation of these tools in practice.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Non-invasive brain stimulation; cerebrovascular accident; mixed methods analysis; perceptions; rehabilitation technology; robot

Year:  2018        PMID: 30236033     DOI: 10.1080/10749357.2018.1493072

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Top Stroke Rehabil        ISSN: 1074-9357            Impact factor:   2.119


  6 in total

1.  Analysis of the Factors Related to the Effectiveness of Transcranial Current Stimulation in Upper Limb Motor Function Recovery after Stroke: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  María Antonia Fuentes Calderón; Ainhoa Navarro Miralles; Mauricio Jaramillo Pimienta; Jesús María Gonçalves Estella; María José Sánchez Ledesma
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2019-02-08       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  Integrating Technology Into Clinical Practice for the Assessment of Balance and Mobility: Perspectives of Exercise Professionals Practicing in Retirement and Long-term Care.

Authors:  Karen Van Ooteghem; Avril Mansfield; Elizabeth L Inness; Jaimie Killingbeck; Kathryn M Sibley
Journal:  Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl       Date:  2020-01-16

3.  Acceptability of tDCS in treating stress-related mental health disorders: a mixed methods study among military patients and caregivers.

Authors:  Fenne M Smits; Guido J de Kort; Elbert Geuze
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 3.630

Review 4.  Discussion on the Rehabilitation of Stroke Hemiplegia Based on Interdisciplinary Combination of Medicine and Engineering.

Authors:  Xiaowei Sun; Ke Xu; Yuqing Shi; Hongtao Li; Ruobing Li; Siyu Yang; Hong Jin; Chuwen Feng; Baitao Li; Chunyue Xing; Yuanyuan Qu; Qingyong Wang; Yinghua Chen; Tiansong Yang
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 2.629

5.  Exploring the experiences of stroke patients treated with transcranial magnetic stimulation for upper limb recovery: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Eline Cc van Lieshout; Lilliane D Jacobs; Maike Pelsma; Rick M Dijkhuizen; Johanna Ma Visser-Meily
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 2.474

Review 6.  Patient, carer, and staff perceptions of robotics in motor rehabilitation: a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis.

Authors:  Despina Laparidou; Ffion Curtis; Joseph Akanuwe; Khaled Goher; A Niroshan Siriwardena; Ayse Kucukyilmaz
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2021-12-25       Impact factor: 5.208

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.