Literature DB >> 30233963

Three-Dimensional Templating and Use of Standard Instrumentation in Primary Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Michael H Amini1, Eric T Ricchetti2, Joseph P Iannotti2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Three-dimensional (3D) templating of the glenoid in anatomic shoulder arthroplasty allows for more accurate planning and more optimal positioning of the glenoid component than 2-dimensional computed tomography (2D CT) scans through an improved understanding of both the pathologic and the premorbid glenoid joint line, version, and inclination in reference to an idealized calculated glenoid position. STEP 1 OBTAIN A CT SCAN WITH 3D RECONSTRUCTION AND DEFINE GLENOID VERSION AND INCLINATION: Obtain a CT scan of the entire scapula and proximal part of the humerus with slices of ≤1 mm and a 3D reconstruction with subtraction of the humeral head, and identify the scapular and glenoid planes to define the pathologic version and inclination, which can be done in any commercially available software program while following these basic principles (Video 1). STEP 2 DEFINE PREMORBID GLENOID MORPHOLOGY: Carefully evaluate for the presence of the native glenoid, noting its version and inclination, and be careful to distinguish the true native glenoid from osteophytes (Video 2). STEP 3 PLACE THE VIRTUAL IMPLANT: Place the virtual glenoid component to restore the premorbid glenoid anatomy (Video 3). STEP 4 EVALUATE THE NEED FOR AN AUGMENTED GLENOID COMPONENT BONE GRAFT OR ECCENTRIC REAMING: In the presence of bone loss from posterior glenoid wear, assess the need for an augmented glenoid component, bone graft, or eccentric reaming to achieve adequate backside seating (Video 4). STEP 5 NOTE THE CENTER PIN POSITION AND TRAJECTORY: Once the glenoid component has been templated, note the starting location and trajectory of the center pin used for cannulated glenoid reaming and bone preparation (Video 5). STEP 6 REMOVE REMAINING CARTILAGE AND SOFT TISSUE FROM THE GLENOID SURFACE: Intraoperatively, remove remaining labrum and any remaining cartilage or soft tissue, and expose the glenoid periphery to clearly define the osseous anatomy, including the base of the coracoid, such that it mirrors what the 3D CT scan and preoperative plan display (Video 6). STEP 7 PLACE THE CENTER PIN ACCORDING TO THE PREOPERATIVE PLAN: Place the center pin for glenoid preparation in the previously templated location and trajectory to emulate the surgical plan defined in the software (Video 7).
RESULTS: We performed a prospective, randomized controlled trial of positioning of the glenoid component in anatomic TSA using preoperative planning with 3D CT scans and standard instrumentation compared with using 3D CT preoperative planning with patient-specific instrumentation29.

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 30233963      PMCID: PMC6132710          DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.17.00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JBJS Essent Surg Tech        ISSN: 2160-2204


  29 in total

1.  The use of computerized tomography in the measurement of glenoid version.

Authors:  R J Friedman; K B Hawthorne; B M Genez
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Accuracy of placement of the glenoid component in reversed shoulder arthroplasty with and without navigation.

Authors:  Olivier Verborgt; Thomas De Smedt; Matthias Vanhees; Stefan Clockaerts; Paul M Parizel; Francis Van Glabbeek
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.019

3.  Three-dimensional imaging and templating improve glenoid implant positioning.

Authors:  Joseph P Iannotti; Scott Weiner; Eric Rodriguez; Naveen Subhas; Thomas E Patterson; Bong Jae Jun; Eric T Ricchetti
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Use of three-dimensional computed tomography for the analysis of the glenoid anatomy.

Authors:  Young W Kwon; Kimerly A Powell; Jae Kwang Yum; John J Brems; Joseph P Iannotti
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.019

5.  Effects of glenoid component version on humeral head displacement and joint reaction forces: an experimental study.

Authors:  Richard W Nyffeler; Ralph Sheikh; Todd S Atkinson; Hilaire A C Jacob; Philippe Favre; Christian Gerber
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2006 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.019

6.  Eccentric reaming in total shoulder arthroplasty: a cadaveric study.

Authors:  Robert Gillespie; Robert Lyons; Mark Lazarus
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.390

7.  A modification to the Walch classification of the glenoid in primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis using three-dimensional imaging.

Authors:  Michael J Bercik; Kevin Kruse; Matthew Yalizis; Marc-Olivier Gauci; Jean Chaoui; Gilles Walch
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 3.019

8.  Radiographic comparison of flat-back and convex-back glenoid components in total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Istvan Szabo; Florent Buscayret; T Bradley Edwards; Chantal Nemoz; Pascal Boileau; Gilles Walch
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.019

9.  Comparison of standard two-dimensional and three-dimensional corrected glenoid version measurements.

Authors:  Matthew D Budge; Gregory S Lewis; Eric Schaefer; Stephanie Coquia; Donald J Flemming; April D Armstrong
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 3.019

10.  Three-dimensional preoperative planning software and a novel information transfer technology improve glenoid component positioning.

Authors:  Joseph Iannotti; Justin Baker; Eric Rodriguez; John Brems; Eric Ricchetti; Mena Mesiha; Jason Bryan
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  4 in total

1.  Trends and impact of three-dimensional preoperative imaging for anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jourdan M Cancienne; Ian J Dempsey; Grant E Garrigues; Brian J Cole; Stephen F Brockmeier; Brian C Werner
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2020-03-02

2.  Anatomic total shoulder glenoid component inclination affects glenohumeral kinetics during abduction: a cadaveric study.

Authors:  Tyler W Knighton; Peter N Chalmers; Hema J Sulkar; Klevis Aliaj; Robert Z Tashjian; Heath B Henninger
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 3.507

3.  Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Component Size Prediction with 3-Dimensional Pre-Operative Digital Planning.

Authors:  Michael T Freehill; Jack W Weick; Brent A Ponce; Asheesh Bedi; Derek Haas; Bethany Ruffino; Chris Robbins; Alexander M Prete; John G Costouros; Jon Jp Warner
Journal:  J Shoulder Elb Arthroplast       Date:  2022-05-06

4.  Do glenoid retroversion and humeral subluxation affect outcomes following total shoulder arthroplasty?

Authors:  C Benjamin Ma; Weiyuan Xiao; Madeleine Salesky; Edward Cheung; Alan L Zhang; Brian T Feeley; Drew A Lansdown
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2020-05-07
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.