Literature DB >> 30233942

Arthroscopic Reconstruction After Acute Acromioclavicular Separation Injuries.

Marvin Minkus1, Natascha Kraus1, Carmen Hann1, Markus Scheibel1.   

Abstract

Acute acromioclavicular (AC)-joint dislocations are common injuries of the shoulder girdle. Surgical repair is indicated for acute high-grade (Rockwood types IV, V, and VI) AC-joint injuries. The best treatment for type III is still controversial, but young and active patients with this type of injury might benefit from a surgical AC-joint stabilization. Surgery should be performed within the first 3 weeks after the injury since the biological healing potential decreases with time. Acute AC-joint separation is diagnosed by clinical examination and radiography. Vertical translation anteroposterior stress views with a 10-kg load are used to grade the injuries. Bilateral lateral stress (Alexander) views are used to evaluate dynamic horizontal translation qualitatively. Arthroscopic techniques for AC reconstruction have become more popular in recent years because they are minimally invasive; they allow treatment of concomitant glenohumeral lesions; and they can be performed in one step, with insertion of implants that do not have to be removed later. The arthroscopically assisted double-button technique with an additional AC cerclage was developed to stabilize the AC joint by internal bracing of the torn ligaments. The procedure consists of the following steps. Step 1: With the patient in the beach-chair position, a 2-cm incision is made on top of the clavicle and posterior and lateral viewing portals as well as an anteroinferior working portal are created. Step 2: With the arthroscope in the lateral portal, the subcoracoid bursa and the base of the coracoid are dissected with a radiofrequency ablation device through the anteroinferior portal. Step 3: Coracoclavicular drilling is done with use of a drill guide and under arthroscopic and image-intensifier control. After overdrilling of the Kirschner wires, Nitinol suture passers are introduced and retrieved via the anteroinferior portal. Step 4: Transclavicular and transacromial drill-holes are established for the AC cerclage. Step 5: The 2 double-button devices are attached to the Nitinol suture passers, and the inferior buttons are shuttled through the clavicle and coracoid and then placed parallel to the coracoid base. Step 6: The sutures are tightened, and an anatomical vertical reduction of the AC joint is achieved. Step 7: A triangular acromioclavicular nonabsorbable cerclage tape is used for horizontal stabilization. Step 8: The clavicular incision is closed in 2 layers, including the repair of the deltotrapezoidal fascia and the arthroscopic portals, in a standard fashion. The combined arthroscopically-assisted and image-intensifier-controlled double-button technique with an additional AC cerclage is a safe procedure that enables an anatomical reduction of the AC joint and yields good to excellent clinical results.

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 30233942      PMCID: PMC6132590          DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.16.00063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JBJS Essent Surg Tech        ISSN: 2160-2204


  13 in total

1.  Radiography of the acromioclavicular articulation.

Authors:  O M ALEXANDER
Journal:  Med Radiogr Photogr       Date:  1954

2.  A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder.

Authors:  C R Constant; A H Murley
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Dislocation of the acromioclavicular joint. An end-result study.

Authors:  T N Taft; F C Wilson; J W Oglesby
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Prevalence and pattern of glenohumeral injuries among acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint instabilities.

Authors:  Stephan Pauly; Natascha Kraus; Stefan Greiner; Markus Scheibel
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 3.019

5.  [Arthroscopically assisted stabilization of acute injury to the acromioclavicular joint with the double TightRope™ technique: one-year results].

Authors:  C Gerhardt; N Kraus; S Pauly; M Scheibel
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.000

6.  Arthroscopically assisted stabilization of acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint separations.

Authors:  Markus Scheibel; Silvia Dröschel; Christian Gerhardt; Natascha Kraus
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  Arthroscopically assisted 2-bundle anatomic reduction of acute acromioclavicular joint separations: 58-month findings.

Authors:  Arne J Venjakob; Gian M Salzmann; Florian Gabel; Stefan Buchmann; Lars Walz; Jeffrey T Spang; Stephan Vogt; Andreas B Imhoff
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  [Treatment of acute acromioclavicular joint instability with modern reconstruction procedures].

Authors:  N Kraus; M Scheibel
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.000

9.  Comparison of the subjective shoulder value and the Constant score.

Authors:  Michael K Gilbart; Christian Gerber
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.019

10.  Arthroscopically assisted stabilization of acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint separations in a coracoclavicular Double-TightRope technique: V-shaped versus parallel drill hole orientation.

Authors:  Natascha Kraus; Norbert P Haas; Markus Scheibel; Christian Gerhardt
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 3.067

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.