Literature DB >> 23371472

Arthroscopically assisted 2-bundle anatomic reduction of acute acromioclavicular joint separations: 58-month findings.

Arne J Venjakob1, Gian M Salzmann, Florian Gabel, Stefan Buchmann, Lars Walz, Jeffrey T Spang, Stephan Vogt, Andreas B Imhoff.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Currently, no clinical midterm results have been reported on arthroscopically assisted reduction of the acutely dislocated acromioclavicular (AC) joint using suture-button devices for fixation. HYPOTHESIS: Athroscopically assisted reduction of the acutely dislocated AC joint yields satisfactory clinical outcomes without loss of reduction, clavicle migration, or AC joint degeneration at midterm follow-up evaluation. STUDY
DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4.
METHODS: The clinical and radiographic outcomes of 23 of 30 consecutive patients (21 men, 2 women) who underwent anatomic reduction for acute AC joint dislocation using 2 suture-button devices between 2006 and 2007 were reviewed. Radiographic evaluation was performed by measurement of coracoclavicular (CC) distance and AC displacement. Clinical evaluation included a visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, the Constant score, the simple shoulder test, and the Short Form-36. Previously, this same patient collective was reviewed after 2 years of follow-up using similar methods.
RESULTS: All 23 patients were available for midterm follow-up examination 58 months postoperatively. There were 3 Rockwood type III, 3 type IV, and 17 type V acromioclavicular joint separations. Mean ± SD follow-up was 58 ± 5.6 months (range, 51-67 months). Most patients (96%) remained very satisfied or satisfied with the procedure outcome. The VAS and Constant score improved significantly when compared with baseline (0.3 ± 0.6 and 91.5 ± 4.7 at 58 months postoperatively vs 4.5 ± 1.9 and 34.5 ± 6.9 at baseline) and remained essentially unchanged when compared with the 2-year outcome scores (0.3 ± 0.6 and 91.5 ± 4.7 at 58 months postoperatively vs 0.25 ± 0.5 and 94.3 ± 3.2 at 2 years). Radiographs showed 8 radiographic failures (undercorrection, posterior displacement, or both) and 4 additional overcorrections of the CC distance. When comparing with 24-month data, 17 of 20 radiographs remained unchanged; 1 case of previous overcorrection drifted into normal AC alignment and 2 cases increased in posterior subluxation of the clavicle.
CONCLUSION: Arthroscopically assisted reduction of the acutely dislocated AC joint provides satisfactory clinical results 58 months after surgery. Compared with the baseline, all patients improved significantly. Two of 23 patients revealed an increased posterior dislocation compared with evaluation 24 months after surgery. No further migration of the clavicle or AC joint degeneration was observed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23371472     DOI: 10.1177/0363546512473438

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  44 in total

Review 1.  [Injuries of the acromioclavicular joint: Hook plate versus arthroscopy].

Authors:  G Jensen; A Ellwein; C Voigt; J C Katthagen; H Lill
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  Current state of treatment of acute acromioclavicular joint injuries in Germany: is there a difference between specialists and non-specialists? A survey of German trauma and orthopaedic departments.

Authors:  Maurice Balke; Marco M Schneider; Sven Shafizadeh; Holger Bäthis; Bertil Bouillon; Marc Banerjee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Why does minimally invasive coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction using a flip button repair technique fail? An analysis of risk factors and complications.

Authors:  Benedikt Schliemann; Steffen B Roßlenbroich; Kristian N Schneider; Christina Theisen; Wolf Petersen; Michael J Raschke; André Weimann
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 4.  [Therapy of acute acromioclavicular joint instability. Meta-analysis of arthroscopic/minimally invasive versus open procedures].

Authors:  T Helfen; G Siebenbürger; B Ockert; F Haasters
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.000

5.  Return to sport after acute acromioclavicular stabilization: a randomized control of double-suture-button system versus clavicular hook plate compared to uninjured shoulder sport athletes.

Authors:  D Müller; Y Reinig; R Hoffmann; M Blank; F Welsch; U Schweigkofler; T Stein
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Arthroscopic Reconstruction After Acute Acromioclavicular Separation Injuries.

Authors:  Marvin Minkus; Natascha Kraus; Carmen Hann; Markus Scheibel
Journal:  JBJS Essent Surg Tech       Date:  2017-03-08

Review 7.  Management of acute unstable acromioclavicular joint injuries.

Authors:  Luis Natera Cisneros; Juan Sarasquete Reiriz
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2016-08-19

8.  A comparison between two double-button endoscopically assisted surgical techniques for the treatment acute acromioclavicular dislocations.

Authors:  P Vulliet; M Le Hanneur; V Cladiere; P Loriaut; P Boyer
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2017-08-31

9.  Outcome of arthroscopic treatment for displaced lateral clavicle fractures using a double button device.

Authors:  Philippe Loriaut; Pierre-Emmanuel Moreau; Benjamin Dallaudière; Alexandre Pélissier; Hoang Duc Vu; Philippe Massin; Patrick Boyer
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Value of additional acromioclavicular cerclage for horizontal stability in complete acromioclavicular separation: a biomechanical study.

Authors:  Tim Saier; Arne J Venjakob; Philipp Minzlaff; Peter Föhr; Filip Lindell; Andreas B Imhoff; Stephan Vogt; Sepp Braun
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.