A Hussain1, S El-Hasani2. 1. Doncaster Royal Infirmary, Doncaster and Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals, Doncaster, DN2 5LT, UK. azahrahussain@yahoo.com. 2. King's College Hospitals, London, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: One anastomosis gastric bypass/mini-gastric bypass (OAGB/MGB) is considered an alternative option in metabolic and bariatric surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety, efficacy and postoperative challenges of OAGB/MGB as a new procedure. METHODS: We performed 519 primary MGBs and 8 additional second-stage MGBs during 2014-2018. The data were collected from patients' notes as well as the surgeons' prospective data sheets. Two senior surgeons performed the operations. The ultimate primary measures were assessment of the safety and management of the complications. The secondary outcomes were excess weight loss and resolution of the comorbidities. RESULTS: The type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) remission rate was 83% and 70% over 1 and 3 years, respectively (HBA1C < 6.5%). Weight loss was 28-152 kg (SD 23.11). Excess weight loss ranged from 41 to 125%. Hypertension resolution was 61%, 58% and 58% in the first, second and third years, respectively. Ninety-nine per cent of sleep apnoea patients improved symptomatically and went off the continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) machine. Two (0.37%) patients developed diarrhoea, cured by shortening the afferent biliopancreatic limb (BPL). Eight (1.5%) stomal ulcers were reported. Two patients (0.37%) developed deranged liver function, revised by shortening the BPL in one patient and a reversal in the second patient. The mean follow-up was 2.5 years. Mortality was zero. CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest UK OAGB/MGB study to date showing safety and acceptable results for metabolic syndrome and obesity problems. OAGB/MGB revisional options are rectifying the morbidity and no mortality.
BACKGROUND: One anastomosis gastric bypass/mini-gastric bypass (OAGB/MGB) is considered an alternative option in metabolic and bariatric surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety, efficacy and postoperative challenges of OAGB/MGB as a new procedure. METHODS: We performed 519 primary MGBs and 8 additional second-stage MGBs during 2014-2018. The data were collected from patients' notes as well as the surgeons' prospective data sheets. Two senior surgeons performed the operations. The ultimate primary measures were assessment of the safety and management of the complications. The secondary outcomes were excess weight loss and resolution of the comorbidities. RESULTS: The type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) remission rate was 83% and 70% over 1 and 3 years, respectively (HBA1C < 6.5%). Weight loss was 28-152 kg (SD 23.11). Excess weight loss ranged from 41 to 125%. Hypertension resolution was 61%, 58% and 58% in the first, second and third years, respectively. Ninety-nine per cent of sleep apnoeapatients improved symptomatically and went off the continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) machine. Two (0.37%) patients developed diarrhoea, cured by shortening the afferent biliopancreatic limb (BPL). Eight (1.5%) stomal ulcers were reported. Two patients (0.37%) developed deranged liver function, revised by shortening the BPL in one patient and a reversal in the second patient. The mean follow-up was 2.5 years. Mortality was zero. CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest UK OAGB/MGB study to date showing safety and acceptable results for metabolic syndrome and obesity problems. OAGB/MGB revisional options are rectifying the morbidity and no mortality.
Entities:
Keywords:
Bariatric surgery; Body mass index; Excess weight loss; Metabolic syndrome; One anastomosis gastric bypass/mini-gastric bypass; Roux-en-Y gastric bypass
Authors: Paul V Loar; Luis Sanchez-Ramos; Andrew M Kaunitz; Andrew J Kerwin; Jesus Diaz Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2005-11 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Kamal K Mahawar; Chetan Parmar; Yitka Graham; Nimantha De Alwis; William R J Carr; Neil Jennings; Peter K Small Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2016-10 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Usha K Coblijn; Amin B Goucham; Sjoerd M Lagarde; Sjoerd D Kuiken; Bart A van Wagensveld Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2014-02 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Yingjun Quan; Ao Huang; Min Ye; Ming Xu; Biao Zhuang; Peng Zhang; Bo Yu; Zhijun Min Journal: Gastroenterol Res Pract Date: 2015-06-17 Impact factor: 2.260
Authors: Riaz Ahmed Agha; Mimi R Borrelli; Martinique Vella-Baldacchino; Rachel Thavayogan; Dennis P Orgill Journal: Int J Surg Date: 2017-09-07 Impact factor: 6.071
Authors: Maurizio De Luca; Giacomo Piatto; Giovanni Merola; Jacques Himpens; Jean-Marc Chevallier; Miguel-A Carbajo; Kamal Mahawar; Alberto Sartori; Nicola Clemente; Miguel Herrera; Kelvin Higa; Wendy A Brown; Scott Shikora Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2021-05-03 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Mohammad Kermansaravi; Amir Hossein DavarpanahJazi; Shahab ShahabiShahmiri; Miguel Carbajo; Antonio Vitiello; Chetan D Parmar; Mario Musella Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2021-02-17 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Almino C Ramos; Jean-Marc Chevallier; Kamal Mahawar; Wendy Brown; Lilian Kow; Kevin P White; Scott Shikora Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2020-05 Impact factor: 4.129