| Literature DB >> 30230713 |
Werner Mohl1, Ernest Spitzer2, Robert M Mader3, Vilas Wagh4, Filomain Nguemo5, Dejan Milasinovic6, Alem Jusić1, Cesar Khazen1, Edit Szodorai7, Beatrice Birkenberg8, Gert Lubec9, Juergen Hescheler5, Patrick W Serruys10.
Abstract
AIMS: Cardiac repair has steered clinical attention and remains an unmet need, because available regenerative therapies lack robust mechanistic evidence. Pressure-controlled intermittent coronary sinus occlusion (PICSO), known to induce angiogenetic and vasoactive molecules as well as to reduce regional ischemia, may activate endogenous regenerative processes in failing myocardium. We aimed to investigate the effects of PICSO in patients with advanced heart failure undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy. METHODS ANDEntities:
Keywords: Cardiac regeneration; Embryonic recall; Heart failure; PICSO
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30230713 PMCID: PMC6301157 DOI: 10.1002/ehf2.12354
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ESC Heart Fail ISSN: 2055-5822
Figure 1Study protocol and serum collection. (A) After advancement of a coronary sinus catheter and temporary pressure‐controlled occlusion (PICSO) of a major portion of outflow from coronary veins, pressures are increased as seen in (B); systolic pressures peaks are thought to be the driving force to activate venous endothelium. (C) Immediately frozen to −80°, (D) human fibroblasts and cardiomyocytes are co‐cultured with patient sera to estimate the proliferative power of each serum. After primary culture, cells underwent a starving period before co‐cultured with patient serum.
summary of demographics and clinical data
| PICSO ( | Control ( |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Demographics | |||
| Age (years) ± SD ( | 73.25 ± 10.78 | 64.75 ± 11.0 | 0.076 |
| Gender ( | 7 | 17 | 0.346 |
| 87.5% | 70.83% | ||
| Ejection fraction (%) | 23.13 ± 6.94 | 25.70 ± 8.20 | 0.433 |
| Clinical history | |||
| Diabetes | 2 | 6 | 1 |
| 25% | 25% | ||
| COPD | 1 | 7 | 0.642 |
| 12.5% | 29.17% | ||
| Hyperlipidaemia | 6 | 17 | 1 |
| 75% | 70.83% | ||
| Hypertension | 8 | 20 | 0.217 |
| 100% | 83.33% | ||
| Smoking | 3 | 6 | 0.654 |
| 37.5% | 25% | ||
| Previous stroke | 1 | 1 | 0.444 |
| 12.5% | 4.17% | ||
| Previous myocardial infarction | 3 | 12 | 0.691 |
| 37.5% | 50% | ||
| Valvular disease | 3 | 10 | 1 |
| 37.5% | 41.67% | ||
| Chronic atrial fibrillation (anamnesis) | 1 | 10 | 0.209 |
| 12.5% | 41.67% | ||
| Atrial fibrillation at admission | 0 | 4 | 0.550 |
| 0% | 16.67% | ||
| Dilated CMP | 5 | 9 | 0.217 |
| 62.5% | 37.5% | ||
| Ischaemic CMP | 3 | 14 | 0.423 |
| 37.5% | 58.33% | ||
| Valvular CMP | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| 0% | 4.17% | ||
| Conduction abnormalities | |||
| Left bundle branch block | 5 | 17 | 0.66 |
| 62.5% | 70.83% | ||
| Right bundle branch block | 0 | 3 | 0.555 |
| 0% | 12.5% | ||
| AV block | 0 | 4 | 0.550 |
| 0% | 16.67% | ||
| Medications | |||
| Beta‐blocker | 8 | 20 | 0.217 |
| 100% | 83.33% | ||
| ARB or ACE inhibitor | 8 | 21 | 0.294 |
| 100% | 87.5% | ||
| Diuretic | 8 | 20 | 0.217 |
| 100% | 83.33% | ||
| Lipid‐lowering agent | 5 | 12 | 0.539 |
| 62.5% | 50% | ||
| Device | |||
| CRT‐D | 4 | 18 | 0.218 |
| CRT‐P | 4 | 6 | |
ARB, angiotensin receptor blocker; ACE, angiotensin‐converting enzyme; AV, atrioventricular; CMP, cardiomyopathy; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CRT‐D, cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator; CRT‐P, cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemaker; PISCO, pressure‐controlled intermittent coronary sinus occlusion; SD, standard deviation.
Evaluated using the unpaired Student's t‐test.
Fisher analysis was used if n < 5.
Figure 2Differentially expressed microRNA (miRNA). Here, we show differentially expressed miRNA for both groups. Delta differences between first and second serum collection are shown as mean ddCP for both groups. After normalization of data to global mean, a delta Cq value is obtained (dCq). Differences in expression levels are calculated as dCq (1) − dCq (2) = ddCq. Only statistically significant patterns of miRNA expression are shown. miRNA 145 is involved in a double negative feedback loop with Krüppel‐like factor 4 inducing lineage restricted differentiation. PICSO, pressure‐controlled intermittent coronary sinus occlusion.
Transcription factors in cardiac venous blood
| Pre‐values | Post‐values | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Group | Mean | SD | Mean | SD |
| Change in % |
| 39 kDa FGF5 | PICSO | 1590.06 | 767.70 | 1720.25 | 1195.02 | 0.3461 | 108.19 |
| 39 kDa FGF5 | Control | 5355.90 | 3002.89 | 5141.62 | 2637.02 | 0.2887 | 96.00 |
| 36 kDa FGF5 | PICSO | 2280.27 | 2214.61 | 2943.83 | 3000.44 | 0.2191 | 129.10 |
| 36 kDa FGF5 | Control | 3521.64 | 2600.49 | 2765.38 | 2449.93 | 0.1312 | 78.53 |
| 35 kDa FGF5 | PICSO | 4939.24 | 2099.17 | 5428.65 | 1682.89 | 0.1843 | 109.91 |
| 35 kDa FGF5 | Control | 4395.15 | 972.55 | 4987.40 | 1195.45 | 0.0858 | 113.48 |
| 33 kDa FGF5 | PICSO | 420.00 | 387.83 | 408.00 | 377.30 | 0.4518 | 97.14 |
| 33 kDa FGF5 | Control | 760.04 | 316.19 | 724.87 | 293.82 | 0.3898 | 95.37 |
| 60 kDa TBX5 | PICSO | 1765.94 | 863.50 | 1312.97 | 1055.07 | 0.0199 | 74.35 ( |
| 60 kDa TBX5 | Control | 3923.35 | 2434.77 | 3420.49 | 2564.07 | 0.0392 | 87.18 ( |
| 51 kDa TBX5 | PICSO | 15 583.03 | 9002.37 | 13 358.04 | 6304.52 | 0.1031 | 85.72 |
| 51 kDa TBX5 | Control | 18 691.01 | 3699.77 | 16 532.11 | 3648.23 | 0.0008 | 88.45 ( |
| 41 kDa TBX5 | PICSO | 9052.13 | 7431.67 | 4229.24 | 4571.33 | 0.0343 | 46.72 ( |
| 41 kDa TBX5 | Control | 8670.12 | 9768.61 | 4512.81 | 4529.47 | 0.0409 | 52.05 ( |
| 48 kDa GATA4 | PICSO | 11 881.95 | 1853.15 | 9155.60 | 4549.00 | 0.2165 | 77.05 |
| 48 kDa GATA4 | Control | 20 211.56 | 8359.36 | 11 642.15 | 6247.43 | 0.0010 | 57.60 ( |
| 52 kDa MEF2C | PICSO | 2022.00 | 783.74 | 2424.36 | 1290.11 | 0.1877 | 119.90 |
| 52 kDa MEF2C | Control | 2445.52 | 1038.12 | 2940.57 | 1197.48 | 0.0441 | 120.24 ( |
| 49 kDa MEF2C | PICSO | 8211.22 | 1830.25 | 10 197.42 | 1832.86 | 0.0232 | 124.19 ( |
| 49 kDa MEF2C | Control | 11 319.58 | 2698.46 | 11 750.39 | 3171.96 | 0.1896 | 103.81 |
| 39 kDa HAND2 | PICSO | 364.73 | 480.48 | 1041.79 | 555.15 | 0.1341 | 285.64 |
| 39 kDa HAND2 | Control | 936.69 | 664.02 | 1641.70 | 627.79 | 0.0336 | 175.27 ( |
| 36 kDa HAND2 | PICSO | 1645.37 | 659.21 | 905.55 | 690.90 | 0.1317 | 55.04 |
| 36 kDa HAND2 | Control | 1285.81 | 800.58 | 796.52 | 442.24 | 0.0584 | 61.95 |
| 35 kDa HAND2 | PICSO | 2853.06 | 1721.25 | 2057.02 | 945.99 | 0.1313 | 72.10 |
| 35 kDa HAND2 | Control | 4247.16 | 864.58 | 3927.03 | 1265.71 | 0.1962 | 92.46 |
| 31 kDa HAND2 | PICSO | 11 503.93 | 3422.18 | 14 250.30 | 3086.66 | 0.1367 | 123.87 |
| 31 kDa HAND2 | Control | 9523.03 | 4450.82 | 13 858.94 | 4506.63 | 0.0032 | 145.53 ( |
SD, standard diviation; PISCO, pressure‐controlled intermittent coronary sinus occlusion.
Transcription factors sampled from coronary venous blood in relation to pre‐interventional and post‐interventional values in both groups show a complex pattern of reactions in both groups. A potential interventional effect of PICSO can only be suspected in 49 kDa MEF2C. To allow sophisticated interpretation, a larger cohort of patients is needed.
Figure 3Krüppel‐like factor 4 (KLF‐4) in cardiomyocytes after serum exposure. Cardiomyocytes supravitally sampled from transplant recipient hearts were exposed to serum collected in three control and three pressure‐controlled intermittent coronary sinus occlusion (PICSO) patients according to protocol. Pre‐control and post‐control were set as baseline fluorescence intensity to compare signal differences in PICSO patients. Blue bar, 30 min; red bar, 60 min; orange, 120 min after treatment start. Groups are indicated on the bottom. Bars indicate fold change to control group as defined as 1. Mean fold change is given above error bars of standard deviation. Signalling of sera co‐cultured seem to peak at 60 min and decline thereafter.
Figure 4Real‐time cell index for (A) human primary cardiomyocytes sampled from an explanted heart from a patient with heart failure during transplantation and (B) commercially available fibroblasts cultured in the presence of PICSO (n = 5 patients) or non‐PICSO (n = 6 patients) sera from pre‐procedure and post‐procedure. Cells index was measured up to 250 and 144 h for fibroblast and primary cardiomyocytes, respectively. Student's t‐test significance is given in the graphs on the right for comparisons among groups at the end of the measurement periods. Note that post‐PICSO sera induced additional proliferation, whereas in post‐control sera, no change was evident.