Literature DB >> 30229236

Prevalence of and Predictive Factors for Scoliosis After Surgery for Congenital Heart Disease in the First Year of Life.

Takashi Kaito1, Masatoshi Shimada2, Hajime Ichikawa2, Takahiro Makino1, Shota Takenaka1, Yusuke Sakai1, Hideki Yoshikawa1, Takaya Hoashi2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The surgical treatment of congenital heart disease is reported to be associated with a high prevalence of scoliosis, although the detailed etiology is unknown. Surgical interventions involving the rib cage are considered to increase the risk of scoliosis. However, whether the cardiac condition or the procedure performed makes patients more susceptible to the development of spinal deformity is controversial.
METHODS: The present study included 483 patients who underwent surgery for the treatment of congenital heart disease with use of procedures involving the immature rib cage (sternotomy and/or thoracotomy) during the first year of life, followed by the evaluation of standing chest radiographs at ≥10 years of age. Patients with congenital spinal deformity and potential neuromuscular disease were excluded. The prevalence of and predictive factors for scoliosis were evaluated. The presence of scoliosis (Cobb angle ≥10° to <20°, ≥20° to <30°, ≥30° to <45°, ≥45°), the convex side of the curve, and the location of the curve were evaluated radiographically. Potential predictive factors that were analyzed included the age at the time of surgery, surgical approach, use of cardiopulmonary bypass, postoperative heart failure and/or cyanosis, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, cardiomegaly, and age at the time of radiography.
RESULTS: The mean age at the time of surgery was 112 days, and the mean age at the time of radiography was 14.4 years. The prevalence of scoliosis was 42.4%, and the prevalences of ≥10° to <20°, ≥20° to <30°, ≥30° to <45°, and ≥45° scoliosis were 31.7%, 5.8%, 2.5%, and 2.5%, respectively. Three patients underwent surgery for the treatment of progressive scoliosis. Multivariate analysis indicated that the predictive factors were female sex, left thoracotomy, bilateral thoracotomy, NYHA class, and age at the time of radiography for ≥10° scoliosis; cardiomegaly, NYHA class, and age at the time of radiography for ≥20° scoliosis; cardiomegaly, number of surgical procedures, and age at the time of radiography for ≥30° scoliosis; and cardiomegaly for ≥45° scoliosis. Age at the time of radiography was a predictor of <45° scoliosis; however, the relative association was small.
CONCLUSIONS: Surgery for the treatment of congenital heart disease during the first year of life was associated with a high prevalence of scoliosis (≥40%). While female sex was one of several predictors of ≥10° scoliosis, cardiomegaly was the sole predictor of ≥45° scoliosis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 30229236      PMCID: PMC6132905          DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.17.00045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JB JS Open Access        ISSN: 2472-7245


Congenital heart disease (CHD) is the most common type of birth defect, accounting for one-third of all major congenital anomalies. Worldwide, 1.35 million infants are born with CHD each year, with a worldwide occurrence of 7 per 1,000 live births[1]. Before the advent of cardiac surgery, CHD, together with infectious disease, was the most prominent cause of death during the neonatal and infantile periods. The advent of corrective cardiac surgery in the late 1950s and the increase in knowledge concerning the longitudinal care of patients with CHD have led to a spectacular increase in life expectancy. Today, >90% of children with CHD who survive the first year of life will live into adulthood[2]. However, this long life expectancy has brought new challenges in clinical management as many patients develop late complications, including not only heart-related complications but also skeletal complications[3]. One of the skeletal complications is scoliosis. A high prevalence of scoliosis after cardiac surgery for the treatment of CHD has been reported, and surgical interventions involving the immature rib cage (sternotomy and/or thoracotomy) are considered to increase the risk of scoliosis[4-9]. However, controversy remains with regard to whether the cardiac condition or the procedure performed makes the patient more susceptible to the development of spinal deformity. The purpose of the present study was to elucidate the prevalence of and predictive factors for scoliosis among patients with CHD who underwent cardiac surgery with use of procedures involving the immature rib cage (sternotomy and/or thoracotomy) in the first year of life. We hypothesized that the prevalence of scoliosis is high in such patients and that both cardiac and operative factors can affect the severity of scoliosis.

Materials and Methods

Patients

Institutional review board approval was obtained prior to the initiation of this study, and the requirement for written informed consent of patients and their parents was waived because of the retrospective nature of the study. The 10-year period from 1995 to 2004 was chosen in order to obtain a sizable group of patients and to ensure a minimum duration of follow-up of 10 years from the time of cardiac surgery. Among a total of 975 patients who underwent cardiac surgery for the treatment of CHD in the first year of life, 477 were excluded because of a lack of standing chest radiographs at ≥10 years of age (reported death, n = 80; lost to follow-up including unreported death, n = 397). Among the remaining 498 patients, 5 who demonstrated congenital spinal deformity and 10 who were also affected by neuromuscular diseases also were excluded. The upper age limit at the time of surgery (<1 year) was selected to achieve a uniform skeletal age, which is reported to affect the development of scoliosis. Therefore, 483 patients (257 males and 226 females) were included in the final analysis. The mean age at the time of surgery was 112 days (range, 0 to 364 days), and the mean age at the time of the last standing chest radiograph was 14.4 years (range, 10 to 21 years) (Table I). Patient Demographics The data are given as the mean and the standard deviation, with the range in parentheses.

Radiographic Evaluation

All posteroanterior radiographs included the L2 level or lower. If no tilt of L2 was observed, the lumbar spine was considered to be straight (no lumbar scoliosis). Spinal curvature was measured according to the Cobb method[10] on a flat monitor with use of built-in imaging software (Centricity CDS; M & H). Scoliosis was defined as curvature of >10° and was graded as mild (≥10° to <20°), moderate (≥20° to <30°), pronounced (≥30° to <45°), or a surgical candidate (≥45°) (Table II). Curve locations were classified as high thoracic, low thoracic, or lumbar. For patients with >1 curve, the existence of a vertebral apex that was prominent to the contralateral side of the proximal or distal curve with a Cobb angle of ≥10° was classified as a double thoracic curve or a thoracic and lumbar curve, depending on the location of the curvature. The curvature with the largest Cobb angle was used in the subsequent analysis. Analyzed Factors* CTR = cardiothoracic ratio, and NYHA = New York Heart Association. N = 475 (data not available for 8 patients). The convexity of each curve to the left or right also was recorded. One of the authors, who is a board-certified spine surgeon, measured all of the radiographic parameters.

Data Collection

Clinical data were reviewed for surgical history and cardiac condition. Preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative variables are listed in Table II. Diagnoses of CHD were classified into 20 groups based on primary diagnosis (Table III). Cyanosis was defined if patients were diagnosed as having a single functional ventricle or relatively balanced ventricles but surgically untreatable intracardiac defect(s) with right-to-left shunting. Heart failure was defined if the patient was currently being managed with medications such as digoxin, diuretics, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, or beta blockers. On the basis of posteroanterior chest radiographs, which were used for evaluation of scoliosis, the cardiothoracic ratio (CTR) was measured, and cardiomegaly was defined if the CTR was >0.55[11]. Primary Diagnosis of Enrolled and Excluded Patients

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were performed with use of PASW Statistics (version 24; SPSS). For univariate analysis, the Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare age at initial surgery, age at radiography, and number of procedures, whereas the chi-square test was used to compare sex, use of cardiopulmonary bypass, sternotomy, thoracotomy, postoperative cyanosis/heart failure, and New York Heart Association (NYHA) class. To assess predictive factors for each degree of scoliosis, multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed with use of variables with a p value of <0.20 in univariate analysis. P values of ≤0.05 and ≤0.0083 were considered significant for 2-group and 4-group comparisons, respectively.

Results

Prevalence and Characteristics of Scoliosis

The mean age at the time of the initial cardiac procedure was 112 days (range, 0 to 364 days), and the mean age at the time of radiography was 14.4 years (range, 10 to 21 years). The prevalence of scoliosis was 42.4% (205 of 483), and those of ≥10° to <20°, ≥20° to <30°, ≥30° to <45°, and ≥45° scoliosis were 31.7% (153 of 483), 5.8% (28 of 483), 2.5% (12 of 483), and 2.5% (12 of 483), respectively. Curve locations were high thoracic in 33.2% of the patients, low thoracic in 30.2%, double thoracic in 31.2%, and thoracic and lumbar in 5.4%. Convexity was to the left in >70% of high thoracic curves, to the right in >70% of low thoracic curves, and to the left in >70% of lumbar curves (Table IV). Data regarding nonoperative treatment with serial casting or a brace could not be collected. Only 3 patients underwent surgery for the treatment of progressive scoliosis during the follow-up period. The degrees of curvature at the time of scoliosis surgery were 83° (T4 to T11) at the age of 13 years for 1 of those patients and 48° (T1 to T6) and 56° (T6 to T12) at the age of 17 years for another; the preoperative radiograph for the third patient was unavailable, but she underwent scoliosis surgery at the age of 12 years and demonstrated 37° (T5 to T12) of curvature even after the surgical correction. However, 12 patients (2.5%) demonstrated curvature of >45°, which is the threshold for surgical treatment, and 2 of them had progression to >90°. However, because of their cardiac conditions (with 1 patient showing failure of the Fontan circulation and the other patient having postoperative heart failure with severe pulmonary artery stenosis), neither of those patients underwent scoliosis surgery. Both patients died from heart failure at the age of 13 years. Radiographic Evaluation of Scoliosis* HT = high thoracic curve, LT = low thoracic curve, DT = double thoracic curve, T and L = thoracic and lumbar curve, and L = lumbar curve.

Comparison of Curve Severity Distribution Between Patients ≥18 Years of Age (Skeletally Mature) and Patients <18 Years of Age

To clarify the effect of skeletal maturity on the distribution of curve severities, the prevalence was compared between patients ≥18 years of age (i.e., skeletally mature patients) (mean age, 19.3 years) and patients <18 years of age (mean age; 13.6 years). The distribution of curve severities was not significantly different between the groups (Table V). Comparison of Curve Severity Distribution Between Patients ≥18 Years Old (Skeletally Mature) and Patients <18 Years Old

Effects of Thoracotomy on the Development and Convex Side of the High Thoracic Curve

The prevalence of a high thoracic curve type was significantly higher for patients who underwent right or left thoracotomy compared with patients who did not undergo thoracotomy. However, the sides of the apex were not different between the groups (Table VI). Effects of Thoracotomy on the Prevalence and Convex Side of a High Thoracic Curve* HT = high thoracic, and NA = not applicable. The values are given as the number of patients, with the percentage in parentheses. P < 0.0083 according to the Bonferonni method for 4-group comparison.

Univariate Analysis of Predictive Factors for Scoliosis

In patients with ≥10° scoliosis, the female:male ratio, rate of left thoracotomy, average number of surgical procedures, rate of postoperative heart failure, average NYHA class, and average age at the time of radiography were significantly higher than those in patients without scoliosis (see Appendix). In patients with ≥20° scoliosis, the average number of surgical procedures, rate of cardiomegaly, rate of postoperative heart failure, average NYHA class, and average age at radiography were significantly higher than those in patients with less-than-moderate scoliosis (see Appendix). In patients with ≥30° scoliosis, the average number of surgical procedures, rate of bilateral thoracotomy, rate of cardiomegaly, average NYHA class, and average age at the time of radiography were significantly higher than those in patients with less-than-pronounced scoliosis (see Appendix). In patients with ≥45° scoliosis, the female:male ratio, rate of bilateral thoracotomy, average number of surgical procedures, and rate of cardiomegaly were significantly higher than those in patients with curves of <45° (Table VII). Univariate Analysis for ≥45° (Surgical-Candidate) Scoliosis* CTR = cardiothoracic ratio, and NYHA = New York Heart Association. Chi-square test. The values are given as the mean and the standard deviation. Mann-Whitney U test.

Multivariate Logistic Regression Analysis

Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that predictive factors were female sex (odds ratio [OR] = 2.15, p < 0.001), left thoracotomy (OR = 1.74, p = 0.040), bilateral thoracotomy (OR = 4.20, p = 0.015), NYHA class (OR = 2.80, p < 0.001), and age at radiography (OR = 1.13, p = 0.001) for ≥10° scoliosis; cardiomegaly (OR = 4.15, p = 0.001), NYHA class (OR = 2.80, p < 0.001), and age at radiography (OR = 1.22, p < 0.001) for ≥20° scoliosis; cardiomegaly (OR = 3.29, p = 0.016), number of surgical procedures (OR = 1.41, p = 0.033), and age at radiography (OR = 1.19, p = 0.026) for ≥30° scoliosis; and cardiomegaly (OR = 6.13, p = 0.005) for ≥45° scoliosis (Table VIII). Multivariate Analysis* CI = confidence interval, and NYHA = New York Heart Association.

Discussion

The present study demonstrated that approximately half of patients with CHD who underwent cardiac surgery during the first year of life developed scoliosis. The prevalence of pronounced or surgical-candidate scoliosis (≥30°) also was high (5.0%). While female sex and surgical approach were predictors of ≥10° scoliosis, cardiomegaly and heart failure were associated with more-pronounced scoliosis. Particularly, cardiomegaly was the most significant predictive factor for ≥20° and ≥30° scoliosis. Age at the time of radiography was a predictor of <45° scoliosis; however, the relative association was small.

Prevalence of Scoliosis After Surgical Treatment of CHD and Related Factors

The prevalence of idiopathic scoliosis has been reported to be 2% to 3% for mild scoliosis (≥10°) and 0.1% to 0.3% for pronounced scoliosis (≥30°)[12,13]. However, the prevalence of ≥10° scoliosis in the present study was 10 to 20 times higher than that of idiopathic scoliosis, similar to the findings in a previous report by Ruiz-Iban et al., in which the prevalence of scoliosis was 46% in patients who underwent cardiac surgery before the age of 18 months[7]. Coronal spinal deformity caused by mechanical injury to the costovertebral joints after sternotomy or thoracotomy[14] is thought to result in the high prevalence of scoliosis after congenital heart surgery during the early period of life, when the skeletal structure is immature and grows rapidly. All of the identified predictive factors for scoliosis in the present study, including female sex, heart-related factors (NYHA class), surgical approach, number of surgical procedures, and age at radiography, have already been reported[4-9]. The slightly higher prevalence of scoliosis in female patients is similar to that in previous reports[4-9]; however, multivariate analysis revealed that female sex was not a predictor of ≥20°, ≥30° or ≥45° scoliosis (female-to-male ratios: 1.4 for ≥20° scoliosis, 1.7 for ≥30° scoliosis, and 3.0 for ≥45°scoliosis). This trend toward increased female-to-male ratios with curve progression is not clear compared with that observed for idiopathic scoliosis, for which the female-to-male ratio increases with curve progression (2.0 for mild, 5.4 for moderate, and 10.0 for pronounced scoliosis)[12,13]. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that left and bilateral thoracotomy were predictive factors for ≥10° scoliosis in the present study. However, the direct influence of thoracotomy on the occurrence of scoliosis cannot be proved from this study because 68 (86.1%) of 79 patients who underwent surgery via left thoracotomy and all 18 patients (100%) who underwent surgery via bilateral thoracotomy had undergone subsequent or previous surgery via median sternotomy. Hence, combined thoracotomy and sternotomy, rather than single left thoracotomy, which was typically applied at the closure of patent ductus arteriosus or repair of isolated coarctation of the aorta, would be a predictor of scoliosis.

Further Progression of Scoliosis After Surgery for CHD and Related Factors

NYHA class and cardiomegaly were identified as predictive factors for further progression of scoliosis. Although a theoretical explanation for the direct relationship between heart failure and scoliosis is difficult, cardiomegaly was the sole predictor of ≥45° (surgical-candidate) scoliosis. Thus, our results provide new evidence on the controversial issue of the effect of cardiomegaly on scoliosis. Anterior chest deformity due to cardiomegaly is a well-known clinical phenomenon associated with skeletal immaturity in younger patients. The chest wall on the same side as the cardiac ventricular apex usually deforms anteriorly as a result of repetitive mechanical pulsation of dilated ventricles of the heart and has been shown to be an isolated predictive factor for scoliosis in animal experiments[15]. Thus, cardiomegaly can be a compounding factor of scoliosis caused by the interventions on the immature rib cage during the surgical treatment of congenital heart disease. Associated congenital anomalies or genetic disorders may be related to the high prevalence of scoliosis in patients with CHD after cardiac surgery[16-19]. However, Reckles et al. found only 1 case (<1%) of congenital scoliosis in a study of 377 patients[8]. In the present study, only 5 (1%) of 498 patients who underwent standing radiography demonstrated congenital spinal anomaly and were excluded from analysis. These results suggest that congenital anomalies or genetic disorders do not have a profound influence on the development of scoliosis in patients with CHD[18,19], whereas genetic disorders recently have been shown to have an influence on the development of idiopathic scoliosis[20,21].

Study Limitations

The present study had several limitations. First, the follow-up rate at ≥10 years after surgery was only 50%, largely because of the severity of the heart disorders and the fact that the patients were located all over the country; nevertheless, the follow-up rate was sufficient for statistical analysis. Second, the orthosis prescription rate for patients with more-than-moderate scoliosis is unclear. The effectiveness of prevention of curve progression with use of bracing for skeletally immature patients has been demonstrated[22], and brace treatment with sufficient wearing time can significantly reduce the risk of surgery[23]. Adequate intervention with bracing might have altered the final prevalence of surgical-magnitude curves in the study population. Third, although sternal and chest wall deformities caused by congenital heart surgery may result in scoliosis, the relationship between the existence of sternal and chest wall deformities and the development of scoliosis was not revealed objectively. To estimate their relationship more accurately, lateral chest radiographs are now being made for the patients in the present study and data are being accumulated. Fourth, the mean age at the latest follow-up in the present study was 14.4 years, which was slightly younger than the age at which skeletal maturity is reached. A longer follow-up period may increase the prevalence of scoliosis and affect the results of the statistical analysis. However, it is generally difficult to achieve both a long follow-up period and a high follow-up rate. Finally, Cobb angle measurement including the L2 vertebra as the lowest level in a majority of patients might lead to undermeasurement or mismeasurement of the curvature, and this could result in an underreporting of patients with a lumbar curve.

Overview

In conclusion, cardiac surgery for CHD performed in the first year of life was associated with a high prevalence of scoliosis (≥40%). Female sex and surgical approach were among the predictors of ≥10° scoliosis, whereas cardiomegaly, cardiac function, and the number of surgical procedures were associated with ≥20° and ≥30° scoliosis. Cardiomegaly was the sole predictor of ≥45° scoliosis Thus, our results provide new evidence on the controversial issue of the effect of cardiomegaly on scoliosis. Further improvement of surgical strategies, periodic checkups involving the evaluation of standing chest radiographs for evidence of scoliosis, and cooperation between cardiac and orthopaedic surgeons should be expected to stave off the deterioration in quality of life due to spinal deformity.

Appendix

Tables showing the results of univariate analysis are available with the online version of this article as a data supplement at jbjs.org (http://links.lww.com/JBJSOA/A35).
TABLE I

Patient Demographics

No. of patients483
Female:male ratio (no. of patients)226:257
Interval between birth and initial surgery* (d)112 ± 107 (0-364)
Age at radiography* (yr)14.4 ± 2.9 (10-21)

The data are given as the mean and the standard deviation, with the range in parentheses.

TABLE II

Analyzed Factors*

Cardiac and other factors
 Sex (female or male)
 No. of days between birth and surgery
 Age at radiography (in years)
 Use of cardiopulmonary bypass
 Sternotomy
 Right thoracotomy
 Left thoracotomy
 Both right and left thoracotomy
 Number of surgical procedures
 Cardiomegaly (CTR ≥55%)
 Postop. cyanosis
 Postop. heart failure
 NYHA class (1, 2, 3, or 4)
Radiographic parameters
 Scoliosis (≥10°)
 Curve grade: mild (≥10° to <20°), moderate (≥20° to <30°), pronounced (≥30° to <45°), surgical candidate (≥45°)
 Convex side (right or left)
 Curve type: HT (high thoracic curve only), LT (low thoracic curve only), DT (double thoracic curve), T and L (thoracic and lumbar curves)

CTR = cardiothoracic ratio, and NYHA = New York Heart Association.

N = 475 (data not available for 8 patients).

TABLE III

Primary Diagnosis of Enrolled and Excluded Patients

Primary DiagnosisEnrolled (no. of patients)Excluded (no. of patients)
Tetralogy of Fallot9531
Ventricular septal defect77162
Coarctation/interruption of the aorta4739
Single ventricle, left ventricle3814
Dextro-transposition of the great arteries4329
Atrioventricular septal defect3023
Single ventricle, right ventricle2745
Single ventricle, heterotaxy2420
Total anomalous pulmonary venous connection2217
Double outlet right ventricle1617
Congenital atrioventricular block96
Patent ductus arteriosus939
Atrial septal defect79
Corrected congenital transposition of the great arteries73
Pulmonary atresia, intact ventricular septum79
Congenital mitral stenosis/regurgitation63
Single ventricle, other51
Truncus arteriosus communis45
Congenital aortic stenosis/regurgitation36
Others714
Total483492
TABLE IV

Radiographic Evaluation of Scoliosis*

Cobb angle
 Overall (≥10°)42.4% (205/483)
 Mild (≥10° to <20°)31.7% (153/483)
 Moderate (≥20° to <30°)5.8% (28/483)
 Pronounced (≥30° to <45°)2.5% (12/483)
 Surgical candidate (≥45°)2.5% (12/483)
Curve type
 HT33.2% (68/205)
 LT30.2% (62/205)
 DT31.2% (64/205)
 T and L5.4% (11/205)
Convex side
 HT (left)79.8%
 LT (right)70.6%
 L (left)75.0%

HT = high thoracic curve, LT = low thoracic curve, DT = double thoracic curve, T and L = thoracic and lumbar curve, and L = lumbar curve.

TABLE V

Comparison of Curve Severity Distribution Between Patients ≥18 Years Old (Skeletally Mature) and Patients <18 Years Old

≥18 Years Old (N = 67)<18 Years Old (N = 416)P Value
Mean age and std. dev. (yr)19.3 ± 0.913.6 ± 2.2<0.001
Cobb angle (no. of patients)
 Overall (≥10°)35 (51%)170 (41%)0.080
 Mild (≥10° to <20°)25 (37%)128 (31%)0.285
 Moderate (≥20° to <30°)6 (9%)22 (5%)0.233
 Pronounced (≥30° to <45°)2 (3%)10 (2%)0.777
 Surgical candidate (≥45°)2 (3%)10 (2%)0.777
TABLE VI

Effects of Thoracotomy on the Prevalence and Convex Side of a High Thoracic Curve*

Left Thoracotomy (N = 79)Right Thoracotomy (N = 55)Bilateral Thoracotomy (N = 18)No Thoracotomy (N = 331)
≥2 thoracotomies on same side19 (24%)7 (13%)0 (0%)NA
HT curve32 (40.5%)21 (38%)8 (44%)71 (21%)
 P value (vs. no thoracotomy)<0.0010.0070.023NA
Convex side of HT curve
 Left27 (84%) of 3213 (62%) of 215 (63%) of 859 (83%) of 71
 Right5 (16%) of 328 (38%) of 213 (38%) of 812 (17%) of 71
  P value (for left, right, and bilateral thoracotomy vs. no thoracotomy)0.8720.0390.159NA

HT = high thoracic, and NA = not applicable.

The values are given as the number of patients, with the percentage in parentheses.

P < 0.0083 according to the Bonferonni method for 4-group comparison.

TABLE VII

Univariate Analysis for ≥45° (Surgical-Candidate) Scoliosis*

With ≥45° Scoliosis (N = 12)Without ≥45° Scoliosis (N = 471)P Value
Female:male ratio (no. of patients)9:3217:2540.047
Interval between birth and surgery (d)58.6 ± 55.46113.5 ± 107.40.350§
Cardiopulmonary bypass (no. of patients)11 (92%)448 (95%)0.587
Sternotomy (no. of patients)12 (100%)458 (97%)0.560
Left thoracotomy (no. of patients)2 (17%)77 (16%)0.977
Right thoracotomy (no. of patients)1 (8%)54 (11%)0.736
Bilateral thoracotomy (no. of patients)2 (17%)16 (3%)0.017
Number of surgical procedures2.7 ± 1.41.9 ± 1.20.025§
Cardiomegaly (CTR ≥55%) (no. of patients)7 (58%)64 (14%)<0.001
Postop. cyanosis (no. of patients)1 (8%)57 (12%)0.692
Postop. heart failure (no. of patients)4 (33%)135 (29%)0.724
NYHA class (1/2/3/4) (n = 475) (no. of patients)0/6/4/01/394/65/50.145
Age at radiography (yr)15.2 ± 3.114.4 ± 2.90.312§

CTR = cardiothoracic ratio, and NYHA = New York Heart Association.

Chi-square test.

The values are given as the mean and the standard deviation.

Mann-Whitney U test.

TABLE VIII

Multivariate Analysis*

Odds Ratio (95% CI)P Value
≥10° (mild, moderate, pronounced, and surgical-candidate) scoliosis
 Female sex2.15 (1.45-3.18)<0.001
 Left thoracotomy1.74 (1.24-3.40)0.040
 Bilateral thoracotomy4.20 (1.32-13.3)0.015
 NYHA class2.80 (1.66-4.70)<0.001
 Age at radiography1.13 (1.05-1.21)0.001
≥20° (moderate, pronounced, and surgical-candidate) scoliosis
 Cardiomegaly4.15 (2.06-8.38)0.001
 NYHA class2.80 (1.53-5.10)<0.001
 Age at radiography1.22 (1.10-1.36)<0.001
≥30° (pronounced and surgical-candidate) scoliosis
 Cardiomegaly3.29 (1.25-8.67)0.016
 No. of surgical procedures1.41 (1.03-1.94)0.033
 Age at radiography1.19 (1.01-1.35)0.026
≥45° (surgical-candidate) scoliosis
 Cardiomegaly6.13 (1.71-22.0)0.005

CI = confidence interval, and NYHA = New York Heart Association.

  22 in total

1.  A genome-wide association study identifies common variants near LBX1 associated with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Yohei Takahashi; Ikuyo Kou; Atsushi Takahashi; Todd A Johnson; Katsuki Kono; Noriaki Kawakami; Koki Uno; Manabu Ito; Shohei Minami; Haruhisa Yanagida; Hiroshi Taneichi; Taichi Tsuji; Teppei Suzuki; Hideki Sudo; Toshiaki Kotani; Kota Watanabe; Kazuhiro Chiba; Naoya Hosono; Naoyuki Kamatani; Tatsuhiko Tsunoda; Yoshiaki Toyama; Michiaki Kubo; Morio Matsumoto; Shiro Ikegawa
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2011-10-23       Impact factor: 38.330

2.  Scoliosis and congenital heart disease.

Authors:  A Roth; A Rosenthal; J E Hall; M Mizel
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1973-06       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Scoliosis after median sternotomy in children with congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Miguel A Ruiz-Iban; Jesus Burgos; Hector J Aguado; Jorge Diaz-Heredia; Ignacio Roger; Alfonso Muriel; Pedro A Sanchez
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  A 5-year epidemiological study on the prevalence rate of idiopathic scoliosis in Tokyo: school screening of more than 250,000 children.

Authors:  Masaki Ueno; Masashi Takaso; Toshiyuki Nakazawa; Takayuki Imura; Wataru Saito; Ryousuke Shintani; Kentaro Uchida; Michinari Fukuda; Kazuhisa Takahashi; Seiji Ohtori; Toshiaki Kotani; Shohei Minami
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2011-02-04       Impact factor: 1.601

Review 5.  Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Stuart L Weinstein; Lori A Dolan; Jack C Y Cheng; Aina Danielsson; Jose A Morcuende
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2008-05-03       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 6.  Genetics of congenital heart disease: the contribution of the noncoding regulatory genome.

Authors:  Alex V Postma; Connie R Bezzina; Vincent M Christoffels
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 3.172

7.  Bracing for idiopathic scoliosis: how many patients require treatment to prevent one surgery?

Authors:  James O Sanders; Peter O Newton; Richard H Browne; Donald E Katz; John G Birch; J Anthony Herring
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Scoliosis and congenital heart disease.

Authors:  N Kawakami; K Mimatsu; M Deguchi; F Kato; S Maki
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1995-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Thoracic sequels after thoracotomies in children with congenital cardiac disease.

Authors:  Serpil Bal; Huda Elshershari; Reyhan Celiker; Alpay Celiker
Journal:  Cardiol Young       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 1.093

10.  Cardiothoracic ratio from postero-anterior chest radiographs: a simple, reproducible and independent marker of disease severity and outcome in adults with congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Konstantinos Dimopoulos; Georgios Giannakoulas; Isaac Bendayan; Emmanouil Liodakis; Ricardo Petraco; Gerhard-Paul Diller; Massimo F Piepoli; Lorna Swan; Michael Mullen; Nicky Best; Philip A Poole-Wilson; Darrel P Francis; Michael B Rubens; Michael A Gatzoulis
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 4.164

View more
  3 in total

1.  Thoracogenic scoliosis: a retrospective review of 129 pediatric patients with a mean follow-up of 10 years.

Authors:  Riccardo Sacco; Michel Bonnevalle; Eric Nectoux; Damien Fron; Mourad Ould-Slimane; Dyuti Sharma; Giovanni Lucchesi; Federico Canavese
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 2.721

2.  Hemoptysis due to progressive scoliosis associated with congenital heart disease: a case report.

Authors:  Kohei Yamaguchi; Masashi Uehara; Hiroki Oba; Terue Hatakenaka; Shugo Kuraishi; Shota Ikegami; Takashi Takizawa; Ryo Munakata; Takayuki Kamanaka; Yoshinari Miyaoka; Kiyohiro Takigiku; Jun Takahashi
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 2.362

3.  Conservative treatment of a scoliosis patient after two heart surgeries in early childhood - A case report.

Authors:  Hans-Rudolf Weiss; Manuel Lay; Tamisha Best-Gittens; Marc Moramarco; Mario Jimeranez
Journal:  S Afr J Physiother       Date:  2021-11-30
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.