PURPOSE: The prevalence of adult patients with congenital heart disease (CHD) has been reported with a high degree of variability. Prevalence estimates have been calculated using birth rate, birth prevalence, and assumed survival and derived from large administrative databases. To report more robust prevalence estimate, we performed a systematic review for studies concerning CHD prevalence in adults. Moreover, to diminish bias of calculated estimates, we conducted an evidence-based calculation for the Netherlands. METHODS: A systematic database search was performed to identify reports on the prevalence of adult CHD. Bicuspid aortic valve, mitral valve prolapse, Marfan syndrome, cardiomyopathy, congenital arrhythmia, and spontaneously closed defects were excluded. In addition, CHD prevalence was calculated using birth rate, birth prevalence, and survival estimates. RESULTS: Our search yielded 10 publications on the prevalence of CHD in adults. Four reported results from population wide cross-sectional data, whereas in 6, prevalence was calculated. Mean prevalence reported by empirical studies was 3,562 per million when unspecified lesions were included and 2,297 per million when these were excluded. Mean prevalence derived from calculation was 3,536. Our calculated estimate was 3,228 per million adults. Taking these estimates as well as the limitations inherent to their derivation into consideration, the prevalence of CHD in the adult population is approximately 3,000 per million adults. CONCLUSION: This systematic review presents a comprehensive overview of publications on the prevalence of CHD in adults. The best available evidence suggests that overall prevalence of CHD in the adult population is in the region of 3,000 per million.
PURPOSE: The prevalence of adult patients with congenital heart disease (CHD) has been reported with a high degree of variability. Prevalence estimates have been calculated using birth rate, birth prevalence, and assumed survival and derived from large administrative databases. To report more robust prevalence estimate, we performed a systematic review for studies concerning CHD prevalence in adults. Moreover, to diminish bias of calculated estimates, we conducted an evidence-based calculation for the Netherlands. METHODS: A systematic database search was performed to identify reports on the prevalence of adult CHD. Bicuspid aortic valve, mitral valve prolapse, Marfan syndrome, cardiomyopathy, congenital arrhythmia, and spontaneously closed defects were excluded. In addition, CHD prevalence was calculated using birth rate, birth prevalence, and survival estimates. RESULTS: Our search yielded 10 publications on the prevalence of CHD in adults. Four reported results from population wide cross-sectional data, whereas in 6, prevalence was calculated. Mean prevalence reported by empirical studies was 3,562 per million when unspecified lesions were included and 2,297 per million when these were excluded. Mean prevalence derived from calculation was 3,536. Our calculated estimate was 3,228 per million adults. Taking these estimates as well as the limitations inherent to their derivation into consideration, the prevalence of CHD in the adult population is approximately 3,000 per million adults. CONCLUSION: This systematic review presents a comprehensive overview of publications on the prevalence of CHD in adults. The best available evidence suggests that overall prevalence of CHD in the adult population is in the region of 3,000 per million.
Authors: Mieke M P Driessen; Johannes M P J Breur; Ricardo P J Budde; Joep W M van Oorschot; Roland R J van Kimmenade; Gertjan Tj Sieswerda; Folkert J Meijboom; Tim Leiner Journal: Pediatr Radiol Date: 2015-01-01
Authors: Santanu Guha; S Harikrishnan; Saumitra Ray; Rishi Sethi; S Ramakrishnan; Suvro Banerjee; V K Bahl; K C Goswami; Amal Kumar Banerjee; S Shanmugasundaram; P G Kerkar; Sandeep Seth; Rakesh Yadav; Aditya Kapoor; Ajaykumar U Mahajan; P P Mohanan; Sundeep Mishra; P K Deb; C Narasimhan; A K Pancholia; Ajay Sinha; Akshyaya Pradhan; R Alagesan; Ambuj Roy; Amit Vora; Anita Saxena; Arup Dasbiswas; B C Srinivas; B P Chattopadhyay; B P Singh; J Balachandar; K R Balakrishnan; Brian Pinto; C N Manjunath; Charan P Lanjewar; Dharmendra Jain; Dipak Sarma; G Justin Paul; Geevar A Zachariah; H K Chopra; I B Vijayalakshmi; J A Tharakan; J J Dalal; J P S Sawhney; Jayanta Saha; Johann Christopher; K K Talwar; K Sarat Chandra; K Venugopal; Kajal Ganguly; M S Hiremath; Milind Hot; Mrinal Kanti Das; Neil Bardolui; Niteen V Deshpande; O P Yadava; Prashant Bhardwaj; Pravesh Vishwakarma; Rajeeve Kumar Rajput; Rakesh Gupta; S Somasundaram; S N Routray; S S Iyengar; G Sanjay; Satyendra Tewari; Sengottuvelu G; Soumitra Kumar; Soura Mookerjee; Tiny Nair; Trinath Mishra; U C Samal; U Kaul; V K Chopra; V S Narain; Vimal Raj; Yash Lokhandwala Journal: Indian Heart J Date: 2018-06-08
Authors: Nicole Rubin; Michael R Harrison; Michael Krainock; Richard Kim; Ching-Ling Lien Journal: Semin Cell Dev Biol Date: 2016-04-27 Impact factor: 7.727